Hello, This is an issue we've seen in the CentOS CI for Puppet OpenStack for a while as well. After talking to Alfredo on IRC he reported the following bug a while ago [1]. Best regards [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620221

On 10/03/2018 09:51 AM, Haïkel Guémar wrote: > On 02/10/2018 21:22, iain MacDonnell wrote: >> Not sure if this should go to -users or -dev (or somewhere else)... >> >> RDO (Rocky) ships with python2-requests-2.19.1-3.el7.noarch.rpm and >> python2-chardet-3.0.4-7.el7.noarch.rpm. >> >> The requests code has a hard-coded check for: >> >>       # Check chardet for compatibility. >>       major, minor, patch = chardet_version.split('.')[:3] >>       major, minor, patch = int(major), int(minor), int(patch) >>       # chardet >= 3.0.2, < 3.1.0 >>       assert major == 3 >>       assert minor < 1 >>       assert patch >= 2 >> >> Unfortunately this requirement is not reflected in the >> python2-requests RPM, which just "requires" "python-chardet" (without >> any specific version). If the EL7-bundled version of python-chardet is >> already installed, and one installs python2-requests from the RDO >> repo, either directly or via dependency, python2-chardet does NOT get >> updated, which results in warnings like: >> >> # python -c 'import requests' >> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/__init__.py:91: >> RequestsDependencyWarning: urllib3 (1.21.1) or chardet (2.2.1) doesn't >> match a supported version! >>     RequestsDependencyWarning) >> # >> >> I think that the python2-requests PRM needs an explicit "requires" for >> the specific version of python[2]-chardet. Anyone disagree? What's the >> right way to file a bug on this? >> >> TIA, >> >>       ~iain >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> users(a)lists.rdoproject.org >> http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> To unsubscribe: users-unsubscribe(a)lists.rdoproject.org >> > FYI, I acknowledge this issue so I should deliver a fix today. > About it, we're rebasing requests packages from Fedora but it seems that > they just dropped that lower version requirements for the same reason > [1] so reintroducing it there would not be constructive. > Nonetheless, we will fix it in RDO packages as it impacts EL7 users. > > Regards, > H. > > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589306 > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users(a)lists.rdoproject.org > http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > To unsubscribe: users-unsubscribe(a)lists.rdoproject.org >