[rdo-users] Re: [rdo-dev] Plans in RDO for TripleO deprecation

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 5:31 PM Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <amoralej(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > Hi, > > As communicated in an openstack-discuss thread [1] the TripleO team is > willing to deprecate master and Zed branches of TripleO repos. While > the process for Zed is still under discussion with TC [2], there will > not be new releases for Antelope and following releases. In the last > meeting of RDO we discussed how to manage this change in RDO [3], and > this is our proposal. > > TripleO packages in RDO releases > > - We will maintain TripleO packages in RDO in RDO-Trunk master until > the content of the master branch is removed. According to the info > provided by TripleO CI team, jobs for the master branch will keep > running for some time. > - Zed release is under discussion. We will follow the same approach as > for the master branch and remove the packages from RDO Trunk once the > branches are removed. We'll keep them if they stay in Extented > Maintenance. > - For Antelope release, which is under preparation for GA, we will not > include TripleO packages in CloudSIG official repos. We will also > remove them rpm RDO Trunk once we have confirmation from the TripleO > CI team that they don't need it anymore (or with master branch removal > at latest) > > Currently, TripleO component includes 102 packages but not all of them > are TripleO specific: > > - Non-tripleo puppet modules: we will maintain those in a new > component "puppet". > - Some packages for OpenStack services Heat, Zaqar and Mistral. We > need to look for new components for those, would common be a good fit? > - Non-TripleO ansible roles: are those used out of TripleO? I guess > not, but I'm willing to get feedback from RDO users about what may be > useful so that we can move it to another component > - TripleO packages. To be retired. If any package can be useful for > any other deployment tool, those may be moved to the suitable > component too. > > You can find the entire list of packages in > https://review.rdoproject.org/etherpad/p/post-tripleo-proposal , feel > free to check it and provide any feedback there. > > RDO definition-of-done > > Since last releases, the release criteria for new releases of RDO has > been based on puppet-openstack-integration, packstack (which also > relies on OpenStack Puppet modules) and TripleO jobs results. > > This change forces us to adapt the RDO definition of done. In Antelope > the release criteria will be only based on the > puppet-openstack-integration and packstack jobs (8 jobs) Correct for > Antelope. Going forward, we will reevaluate this in future releases. > sounds right ^^^ and just to note that even before the tripleo announcement there were no plans for tripleo to create an Antelope branch (in the same way we skipped X and Y). The main difference is there will be no 'tagged' version of tripleo for you to include as we did for previous skipped releases. Even though existing pipelines for master will (likely) still be running when you make the release, it doesn't make sense to tag a tripleo promotion for A given the plans going forward.

thanks, marios > We will continue refining this plan the next few weeks, please let us > know any doubt or suggestion that you may have on this thread, in #rdo > or in the weekly meetings (wed. 14:00 UTC in #rdo). > > Best regards, > > Alfredo > > [1] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-February/032... > [2] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-February/032... > [3] https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/rdo_meeting___2023_02_15/2023/rdo_m... > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list -- dev(a)lists.rdoproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)lists.rdoproject.org > %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s > > To unsubscribe: %(_internal_name)s-unsubscribe@%(host_name)s