Update Openstack Ussuri and CentOS 8
by Benjamin Zapiec
Hello *,
due to CentOS 8 being EOL to the end of this year I did some
investigation on how to properly update and Openstack environment
running CentOS 8 and Openstack Ussuri.
If you just want to update the operation system it seems like
there is no problem at all. Just do a
> dnf switch stream
and
> dnf distro-sync
Since openstack has proven its complexity i can't imagine that
it is that simple if you are running an openstack environment
on it :D
Any chance to update to CentOS …
[View More]stream without breaking the environment?
If not I don't see any restrictions in updating both, the openstack
version and the operating system version. But may you tell me if there
is an migration path to successfully update from CentOS 8 to CentOS
stream?
Do i have to update CentOS before updating Openstack or wise versa?
Do you have any information on how to update?
If this was already discussed please send me a link.
I found the following on the internet:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-February/0206...
That was already useful but didn't answered my questions entirely.
Best regards
--
Benjamin Zapiec <benjamin.zapiec(a)gonicus.de> (System Engineer)
* GONICUS GmbH * Moehnestrasse 55 (Kaiserhaus) * D-59755 Arnsberg
* Tel.: +49 2932 916-0 * Fax: +49 2932 916-245
* http://www.GONICUS.de
* Sitz der Gesellschaft: Moehnestrasse 55 * D-59755 Arnsberg
* Geschaeftsfuehrer: Rainer Luelsdorf, Alfred Schroeder
* Vorsitzender des Beirats: Juergen Michels
* Amtsgericht Arnsberg * HRB 1968
Wir erfüllen unsere Informationspflichten zum Datenschutz gem. der
Artikel 13
und 14 DS-GVO durch Veröffentlichung auf unserer Internetseite unter:
https://www.gonicus.de/datenschutz oder durch Zusendung auf Ihre
formlose Anfrage.
[View Less]
3 years, 4 months
[Meeting] RDO meeting (2021-08-18) minutes
by YATIN KAREL
==============================
#rdo: RDO meeting - 2021-08-18
==============================
Meeting started by ykarel at 14:01:10 UTC. The full logs are available
athttps://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/rdo_meeting___2021_08_18/2021/rdo...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* roll call (ykarel, 14:01:40)
* RDO xena release preparation (ykarel, 14:05:59)
* non client libraries release this week (ykarel, 14:06:45)
* LINK: https://releases.openstack.org/xena/schedule.html (ykarel,
…
[View More] 14:06:49)
* ACTION: ykarel to create xena release preparation trello card and
etherpad (ykarel, 14:08:06)
* jenkins jobs migration update (ykarel, 14:11:13)
* LINK:
https://review.rdoproject.org/r/q/topic:jenkins-v2+(status:open%20OR%20st...
(ykarel, 14:11:36)
* almost all patches are merged, just 1 pending (ykarel, 14:12:24)
* Drop kolla package from Xena? (ykarel, 14:16:06)
* It was added for Building TripleO Containers, but since Train+
releases TripleO not using it (ykarel, 14:16:28)
* With https://github.com/openstack/kolla/commit/383364 kolla moved to
jinja2 > 3.0.0 (ykarel, 14:17:37)
* we consume jinja2 from centos base repos which is still < 3.0.0, and
we avoid updates to deps from base repos until and unless really
needed, for kolla it's really needed as codebase requires it, but if
we plan to drop kolla then we can avoid it (ykarel, 14:18:59)
* chair for next week (ykarel, 14:26:20)
* ACTION: spotz to chair next week (ykarel, 14:28:28)
* Open Floor (ykarel, 14:28:33)
Meeting ended at 14:33:49 UTC.
Action items, by person
-----------------------
* spotz
* spotz to chair next week
* ykarel
* ykarel to create xena release preparation trello card and etherpad
People present (lines said)
---------------------------
* ykarel (49)
* spotz (12)
* mwhahaha (8)
* opendevmeet (4)
* rdogerrit (3)
* weshay|ruck (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)lists.rdoproject.org
http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
To unsubscribe: users-unsubscribe(a)lists.rdoproject.org
[View Less]
3 years, 4 months
Can compute node be deployed as VM with nested KVM for test purpose
by wodel youchi
Hi,
As mentioned in the mail subject, using nested KVM, can I deploy compute
nodes as VMs for test and learning purposes?
If yes, does CUSTOM_BAREMETAL have to be set to 0?
I tried to deploy Train on VMs (3 controllers and 3 compute HCI), but I got
this error :
> 2021-08-17 14:48:50.912 10 ERROR nova.scheduler.utils
> [req-92f040e7-3845-4e71-bade-b248e7752407 2697a416f4374ec4b5104b1a6f07763f
> 210ce11740904ed4a5f693a7c41cb709 - default default] [instance:
> 0c5d829c-7f3e-4d07-…
[View More]afb0-2307515ac6b8] Error from last host:
> udtrain.example.com (node eff46043-a36c-4a92-a211-47d09863547a):
> ['Traceback (most recent call last):\n', ' File
> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/nova/compute/manager.py", line 2487, in
> _build_and_run_instance\n block_device_info=block_device_info)\n', '
> File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/nova/virt/ironic/driver.py", line
> 1289, in spawn\n \'node\': node_uuid})\n', ' File
> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/oslo_utils/excutils.py", line 220, in
> __exit__\n self.force_reraise()\n', ' File
> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/oslo_utils/excutils.py", line 196, in
> force_reraise\n six.reraise(self.type_, self.value, self.tb)\n', ' File
> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/six.py", line 703, in reraise\n raise
> value\n', ' File
> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/nova/virt/ironic/driver.py", line 1281,
> in spawn\n
> timer.start(interval=CONF.ironic.api_retry_interval).wait()\n', ' File
> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/eventlet/event.py", line 125, in wait\n
> result = hub.switch()\n', ' File
> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/eventlet/hubs/hub.py", line 298, in
> switch\n return self.greenlet.switch()\n', ' File
> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/oslo_service/loopingcall.py", line 150,
> in _run_loop\n result = func(*self.args, **self.kw)\n', ' File
> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/nova/virt/ironic/driver.py", line 558, in
> _wait_for_active\n raise exception.InstanceDeployFailure(msg)\n',
> 'nova.exception.InstanceDeployFailure: Failed to provision instance
> 0c5d829c-7f3e-4d07-afb0-2307515ac6b8: None\n', '\nDuring handling of the
> above exception, another exception occurred:\n\n', 'Traceback (most recent
> call last):\n', ' File
> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/nova/compute/manager.py", line 2211, in
> _do_build_and_run_instance\n filter_properties, request_spec)\n', '
> File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/nova/compute/manager.py", line
> 2587, in _build_and_run_instance\n instance_uuid=instance.uuid,
> reason=six.text_type(e))\n', 'nova.exception.RescheduledException: Build of
> instance 0c5d829c-7f3e-4d07-afb0-2307515ac6b8 was re-scheduled: Failed to
> provision instance 0c5d829c-7f3e-4d07-afb0-2307515ac6b8: None\n']
>
>
> 2021-08-17 14:48:51.039 10 WARNING nova.scheduler.client.report
> [req-92f040e7-3845-4e71-bade-b248e7752407 2697a416f4374ec4b5104b1a6f07763f
> 210ce11740904ed4a5f693a7c41cb709 - default default]Failed to save
> allocation for 0c5d829c-7f3e-4d07-afb0-2307515ac6b8. *Got HTTP 409:
> {"errors": [{"status": 409, "title": "Conflict", "detail": "There was a
> conflict when trying to complete your request.\n\n Unable to allocate
> inventory: Unable to create allocation for 'CUSTOM_BAREMETAL' on resource
> provider '6d3724fc-6f13-4588-bbe5-56bc4f9a4f87'. The requested amount would
> exceed the capacity. ", "*code": "placement.undefined_code",
> "request_id": "req-6d6bd59b-adc2-4891-a014-d02b387f7355"}]}
>
Regards.
[View Less]
3 years, 4 months
Error baremetal pre-deploy wallaby
by wodel youchi
Hi,
I followed these documents :
https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/featu...
https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/featu...
https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/provi...
At the end I tried these two commands :
1) openstack overcloud node provision --stack overcloud --network-config
--output ~/overcloud-baremetal-deployed.yaml ~/templates/baremetal-node-net
.yaml
And I this error message :
> …
[View More]2021-08-15 15:59:32.402435 | 52540075-9baf-2b0b-5fc8-000000000017 |
> FATAL | Provision instances | localhost | error={"changed": false,
> "logging": "Deploy attempt failed on node computeHCI2
> (UUID 9440e769-9634-4015-82b0-97b8c1921ef5),
> cleaning up\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File
> \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_provisioner.py\", line 392,
> in provision_node\n nics.validate()\n
> File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 60, in
> validate\n
> result.append(('network', self._get_network(nic)))\n File
> \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 128, in
> _get_network\n
> 'Unexpected fields for a network: %s' % ',
> '.join(unexpected))\nmetalsmith.exceptions.InvalidNIC:
> Unexpected fields for a network: subnet\nDeploy attempt failed on node
> computeHCI0 (UUID 31eecc38-7d80-4ddd-9cc4-a76edf00ec3a),
> cleaning up\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File
> \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_provisioner.py\", line 392,
> in provision_node\n
> nics.validate()\n File
> \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 60, in
> validate\n
> result.append(('network', self._get_network(nic)))\n File
> \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 128, in
> _get_network\n
> 'Unexpected fields for a network: %s' % ',
> '.join(unexpected))\nmetalsmith.exceptions.InvalidNIC:
> Unexpected fields for a network: subnet\nDeploy attempt failed on node
> controller2 (UUID f62f8cb5-40e4-4e40-805d-852c2a2f7e00),
> cleaning up\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File
> \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_provisioner.py\", line 392,
> in provision_node\n nics.validate()\n File
> \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 60, in
> validate\n
> result.append(('network', self._get_network(nic)))\n File
> \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 128, in
> _get_network\n
> 'Unexpected fields for a network: %s' % ',
> '.join(unexpected))\nmetalsmith.exceptions.InvalidNIC:
> Unexpected fields for a network: subnet\nDeploy attempt failed on node
> computeHCI1 (UUID 2798b208-4842-4083-9b3f-c46953b52928),
> cleaning up\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File
> \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_provisioner.py\", line 392,
> in provision_node\n nics.validate()\n File
> \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 60, in
> validate\n
> result.append(('network', self._get_network(nic)))\n File
> \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 128, in
> _get_network\n
> 'Unexpected fields for a network: %s' % ',
> '.join(unexpected))\nmetalsmith.exceptions.InvalidNIC: Unexpected fields
> for a network: subnet\n
> Deploy attempt failed on node controller1 (UUID
> df87e5c7-32b0-4bfa-9ef9-f0a98666e7de), cleaning up\nTraceback (most recent
> call last):\n
> File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_provisioner.py\",
> line 392, in provision_node\n
> nics.validate()\n File
> \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 60, in
> validate\n
> result.append(('network', self._get_network(nic)))\n File
> \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 128, in
> _get_network\n
> 'Unexpected fields for a network: %s' % ',
> '.join(unexpected))\nmetalsmith.exceptions.InvalidNIC: Unexpected fields
> for a network: subnet\nDeploy attempt failed on node controller0 (UUID
> af75122c-a6e8-42d7-afd2-571738c42061), cleaning up\nTraceback (most recent
> call last):\n File
> \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_provisioner.py\", line 392,
> in provision_node\n nics.validate()\n File
> \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 60, in
> validate\n result.append(('network', self._get_network(nic)))\n File
> \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/metalsmith/_nics.py\", line 128, in
> _get_network\n 'Unexpected fields for a network: %s' % ',
> '.join(unexpected))\nmetalsmith.exceptions.InvalidNIC: Unexpected fields
> for a network: subnet\n", "msg": "Unexpected fields for a network: subnet"}
>
2) openstack overcloud node provision --stack overcloud --output ~/
overcloud-baremetal-deployed.yaml ~/templates/baremetal-node.yaml
This time I got this error :
> 2021-08-16 13:47:02.156021 | 52540075-9baf-0672-d7b8-000000000017 |
> FATAL | Provision instances | localhost | error={"changed": false,
> "logging": "Created port overcloud-computehci-1-ctlplane (UUID
> 17e55729-b44b-40a8-9361-9e36e8527de5) for node controller0 (UUID
> 61bc6512-9c4e-4199-936a-754801f7cffa) with {'network_id':
> '1c8c5e86-79ac-4ec6-9616-3c965cab6e88', 'name':
> 'overcloud-computehci-1-ctlplane'}\nCreated port
> overcloud-controller-0-ctlplane (UUID 0a09bbb5-934d-4d34-ab5b-7c14518d06c6)
> for node controller1 (UUID 03915e7c-a314-41d9-be8c-46291879692a) with
> {'network_id': '1c8c5e86-79ac-4ec6-9616-3c965cab6e88', 'name':
> 'overcloud-controller-0-ctlplane'}\nCreated port
> overcloud-computehci-2-ctlplane (UUID 76ef56f1-4dbb-453e-a344-968b0da95823)
> for node computeHCI2 (UUID a5d3552b-ab79-404e-8a52-48dc53a3aa45) with
> {'network_id': '1c8c5e86-79ac-4ec6-9616-3c965cab6e88', 'name':
> 'overcloud-computehci-2-ctlplane'}\nCreated port
> overcloud-computehci-0-ctlplane (UUID 79967f38-90ee-49e6-8716-b09cc9460afe)
> for node computeHCI1 (UUID 3534309b-c11f-48d4-b23d-3ed9f2dcbf79) with
> {'network_id': '1c8c5e86-79ac-4ec6-9616-3c965cab6e88', 'name':
> 'overcloud-computehci-0-ctlplane'}\nCreated port
> overcloud-controller-1-ctlplane (UUID c70b7c8c-31a6-460e-aa77-ea37b8e332f6)
> for node controller2 (UUID 83f47771-9f82-4437-8df4-de32bcd6fc63) with
> {'network_id': '1c8c5e86-79ac-4ec6-9616-3c965cab6e88', 'name':
> 'overcloud-controller-1-ctlplane'}\nCreated port
> overcloud-controller-2-ctlplane (UUID 2b74c4e3-705c-4bf1-85de-a5e0a9cdb591)
> for node computeHCI0 (UUID 3924529b-44a7-4c74-b1e1-2175d6313a3e) with
> {'network_id': '1c8c5e86-79ac-4ec6-9616-3c965cab6e88', 'name':
> 'overcloud-controller-2-ctlplane'}\nAttached port
> overcloud-controller-0-ctlplane (UUID 0a09bbb5-934d-4d34-ab5b-7c14518d06c6)
> to node controller1 (UUID 03915e7c-a314-41d9-be8c-46291879692a)\nAttached
> port overcloud-computehci-1-ctlplane (UUID
> 17e55729-b44b-40a8-9361-9e36e8527de5) to node controller0 (UUID
> 61bc6512-9c4e-4199-936a-754801f7cffa)\nProvisioning started on node
> controller1 (UUID 03915e7c-a314-41d9-be8c-46291879692a)\nAttached port
> overcloud-computehci-2-ctlplane (UUID 76ef56f1-4dbb-453e-a344-968b0da95823)
> to node computeHCI2 (UUID a5d3552b-ab79-404e-8a52-48dc53a3aa45)\nAttached
> port overcloud-computehci-0-ctlplane (UUID
> 79967f38-90ee-49e6-8716-b09cc9460afe) to node computeHCI1 (UUID
> 3534309b-c11f-48d4-b23d-3ed9f2dcbf79)\nProvisioning started on node
> controller0 (UUID 61bc6512-9c4e-4199-936a-754801f7cffa)\nAttached port
> overcloud-controller-1-ctlplane (UUID c70b7c8c-31a6-460e-aa77-ea37b8e332f6)
> to node controller2 (UUID
> 83f47771-9f82-4437-8df4-de32bcd6fc63)\nProvisioning started on node
> computeHCI2 (UUID a5d3552b-ab79-404e-8a52-48dc53a3aa45)\nProvisioning
> started on node computeHCI1 (UUID
> 3534309b-c11f-48d4-b23d-3ed9f2dcbf79)\nAttached port
> overcloud-controller-2-ctlplane (UUID 2b74c4e3-705c-4bf1-85de-a5e0a9cdb591)
> to node computeHCI0 (UUID
> 3924529b-44a7-4c74-b1e1-2175d6313a3e)\nProvisioning started on node
> controller2 (UUID 83f47771-9f82-4437-8df4-de32bcd6fc63)\nProvisioning
> started on node computeHCI0 (UUID 3924529b-44a7-4c74-b1e1-2175d6313a3e)\n",
> "msg": "Node a5d3552b-ab79-404e-8a52-48dc53a3aa45 reached failure state
> \"deploy failed\"; the last error is Agent returned error for deploy step
> {'step': 'write_image', 'priority': 80, 'argsinfo': None, 'interface':
> 'deploy'} on node a5d3552b-ab79-404e-8a52-48dc53a3aa45 : Error performing
> deploy_step write_image: Command execution failed: Failed to check the
> number of primary partitions present on /dev/vda for node
> a5d3552b-ab79-404e-8a52-48dc53a3aa45. Error: The device /dev/vda does not
> have a valid MBR partition table."}
>
Regards.
[View Less]
3 years, 4 months
Error deploying wallaby
by wodel youchi
Hi,
This my deployment script :
#!/usr/bin/env bash
source ~/stackrc
time openstack overcloud deploy --stack overcloud \
--libvirt-type kvm \
--ntp-server 172.16.0.252 \
--templates \
-r /home/stack/templates/roles_data.yaml \
-n /home/stack/templates/network_data-new.yaml \
-e /home/stack/templates/containers-prepare-parameter.yaml \
-e
/usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/enable-swap-partition.yaml
\
-e
/usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/…
[View More]environments/docker-ha.yaml \
-e /home/stack/templates/node-info.yaml \
-e /home/stack/templates/inject-trust-anchor-hiera.yaml \
-e
/usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/services/octavia.yaml
\
-e
/usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/cephadm/cephadm.yaml
\
-e
/usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/cephadm/ceph-dashboard.yaml
\
-e /home/stack/templates/cephadmin-overrides.yaml \
-e
/usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/disable-telemetry.yaml
\
-e /home/stack/templates/networks-deployed-environment.yaml \
-e /home/stack/templates/vips-deployed-environment.yaml \
-e /home/stack/templates/network-environment-overrides.yaml \
-e /home/stack/templates/firstboot-environment.yaml
I am trying to deploy an HCI overcloud. Each node has 6 nics
When I launch it I get this error :
> 2021-08-16 13:33:29.331 80390
> ERROR tripleoclient.v1.overcloud_deploy.DeployOvercloud [-] Exception
> occured while running the command:
> ValueError: Failed to deploy: ERROR: Internal Error Traceback (most recent
> call last):\n', '
> File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/heat/engine/resources/stack$
> resource.py", line 75, in validate_nested_stack\n
> nested_stack.validate()\n', '
> File "/usr/lib/python3.6$
> site-packages/osprofiler/profiler.py", line 160, in wrapper\n result =
> f(*args, **kwargs)\n', ' File "/u$
> r/lib/python3.6/site-packages/heat/engine/stack.py", line 969, in
> validate\n result = res.validate()\n', $
> File
> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/heat/engine/resources/openstack/neutron/port.py",
> line 454, in vali$
> ate\n super(Port, self).validate()\n', ' File
> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/heat/engine/resources/op$
> nstack/neutron/neutron.py", line 43, in validate\n res =
> super(NeutronResource, self).validate()\n', ' F$
> le "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/heat/engine/resource.py", line 1870,
> in validate\n return self.valid$
> te_template()\n', ' File
> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/heat/engine/resource.py", line 1882, in
> validate$
> template\n self.t.resource_type\n', ' File
> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/heat/engine/resource.py", l$
> ne 200, in _validate_service_availability\n
>
>
> * raise ex\n', 'heat.common.exception.ResourceTypeUnavailable: $EAT-E99001
> Service neutron is not available for resource type
> OS::TripleO::DeployedServer::ControlPlanePort,reason: neutron network
> endpoint is not in service catalog.\n', '\nDuring handling of the above
> exception, a$*
> other exception occurred:\n\n', 'Traceback (most recent call last):\n', '
> File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-pac$
> ages/heat/engine/resources/stack_resource.py", line 75, in
> validate_nested_stack\n nested_stack.validate($
> \n', ' File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/osprofiler/profiler.py",
> line 160, in wrapper\n result = f$
> *args, **kwargs)\n', ' File
> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/heat/engine/stack.py", line 969, in
> validate\$
> result = res.validate()\n', ' File
> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/heat/engine/resources/template_res$
> urce.py", line 267, in validate\n result = super(TemplateResource,
> self).validate()\n', ' File "/usr/lib$
> python3.6/site-packages/heat/engine/resources/stack_resource.py", line 65,
> in validate\n self.validate_ne$
> ted_stack()\n', ' File
> "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/heat/engine/resources/stack_resource.py",
> line 81,
>
Regards.
[View Less]
3 years, 4 months
Re: [rdo-users] Error creating network isolation file
by wodel youchi
Hi, and thank you for your help.
As I said, after re-reading the documentation, I found the new
documentation, and I tried to follow it, but it's not clear.
First of all, I did not find the
"/usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/network-data-samples"
directory in my system, so I used the one from the GIT.
1 - I modified the network_data.yaml file as needed.
2 - Then I copied the vip_data.yaml file as is without modification.
3 - I created then the network-environment-overrides.yaml using …
[View More]this link (
https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/featu...),
I wanted to use bond-with-vlans configuration.
4 - I used this file (
https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ansible/src/branch/master/tripleo_a...)
and I modified it to create my bonds and vlans and to map them to the
different networks.
5 - I created the networks-deployed-environment.yaml as mentioned like this
:
openstack overcloud network provision --output
networks-deployed-environment.yaml network_data.yaml
6 - Then I created the vip-deployed-environment.yaml using :
openstack overcloud network vip provision --output
~/templates/vip-deployed-environment.yaml ~/templates/vip_data.yaml
Am I correct till now? my conf files are attached
Then the documentation says, if you want to deploy use :
a - this command
openstack overcloud deploy --templates \
-n network_data.yaml \
-e networks-deployed-environment.yaml \
-e vip-deployed-environment.yaml \
-e network-environment-overrides.yaml
b - Or this command
openstack overcloud deploy --templates \
--networks-file network_data.yaml \
--vip-file vip_data.yaml \
--baremetal-deployment baremetal_deployment.yaml \
--network-config \
-e network-environment-overrides.yaml
What I don't understand is the difference between the two of them,
Does the first command mean : deploy the configuration on the already
deployed nodes (or already deployed overcloud)?
And does the second command mean : deploy the OS on the overcloud nodes
before deploying the overcloud itself?
PS : for the network part :
Each overcloud node has 6 nics :
- 2 nics will be bonded and used for the provisioning network. -> I didn't
know how to modify the bonds_vlans.j2 to create a bond on the ctplane
network.
- 2 nics will be bonded and used for the external, api and tenant networks.
- 2 nics will be bonded and used on the storage and the storage management
networks.
Regards.
Le jeu. 12 août 2021 à 03:04, Wan, Sam <Sam.Wan(a)dell.com> a écrit :
> Hi Wodel Youchi,
>
>
>
> You’re using the template for Victoria and prior releases according to
> https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/featu...
> .
>
>
>
> For wallaby, the hierarchy is like this:
>
> *name*
>
> Name of the network (mandatory)
>
> *vip*
>
> Enable creation of a virtual IP on this network
>
> *subnets*
>
> Dictionary’s, one or more subnet definition items keyed by the subnet name.
>
> *subnet_name*
>
> Name of the subnet
>
> *ip_subnet*
>
> IP/CIDR, e.g. *'10.0.0.0/24 <http://10.0.0.0/24>'*
>
> *allocation_pools*
>
> IP range list, e.g. *[{'start':'10.0.0.4',* *'end':'10.0.0.250'}]*
>
> *gateway_ip*
>
> Gateway for the network
>
> *vlan*
>
> Vlan ID for this network. (supported in Queens and later)
>
>
>
> And there’s an example in the doc
>
> - *name*: CustomNetwork
>
> *vip*: false
>
> *name_lower*: custom_network
>
> *subnets*:
>
> *custom_network_subnet*:
>
> *ip_subnet*: 172.16.6.0/24
>
> *allocation_pools*:
>
> - *start*: 172.16.6.4
>
> - *end*: 172.16.6.250
>
> *gateway_ip*: 172.16.6.1
>
>
>
>
>
> Another example in the doc:
>
> *subnets*:
>
> *subnet_name_a*:
>
> *ip_subnet*: 192.0.2.0/24
>
> *allocation_pools*:
>
> - *start*: 192.0.2.50
>
> *end*: 192.0.2.99
>
> *gateway_ip*: 192.0.2.1
>
> *vlan*: 102
>
> *subnet_name_b*:
>
> *ip_subnet*: 198.51.100.0/24
>
> *allocation_pools*:
>
> - *start*: 198.51.100.50
>
> *end*: 198.51.100.99
>
> *gateway_ip*: 198.51.100.1
>
> *vlan*: 101
>
>
>
>
>
> So your network_data.yaml should be like this:
>
> - name: Storage
>
> vip: true
>
> mtu: 1500
>
> name_lower: storage
>
> subnets:
>
> storage_subnet:
>
> ip_subnet: 10.100.7.0/24
>
> allocation_pools: [{'start': '10.100.7.150', 'end': '10.100.7.250'}
>
> vlan: 1107
>
> - name: StorageMgmt
>
> vip: true
>
> mtu: 1500
>
> name_lower: storage_mgmt
>
> subnets:
>
> storagemgmt_subnet:
>
> ip_subnet: 10.100.8.0/24
>
> allocation_pools: [{'start': '10.100.8.150', 'end': '10.100.8.250'}
>
> vlan: 1108
>
> - name: InternalApi
>
> vip: true
>
> mtu: 1500
>
> name_lower: internal_api
>
> subnets:
>
> internalapi_subnet:
>
> ip_subnet: 10.100.5.0/24
>
> allocation_pools: [{'start': '10.100.5.150', 'end': '10.100.5.250'}]
>
> vlan: 1105
>
> - name: Tenant
>
> vip: false
>
> mtu: 1500
>
> name_lower: tenant
>
> subnets:
>
> tenant_subnet:
>
> ip_subnet: 10.100.6.0/24
>
> allocation_pools: [{'start': '10.100.6.150', 'end': '10.100.6.250'}]
>
> vlan: 1106
>
> - name: External
>
> vip: true
>
> mtu: 1500
>
> name_lower: external
>
> subnets:
>
> external_subnet:
>
> ip_subnet: 10.0.1.0/24
>
> allocation_pools: [{'start': '10.0.1.4', 'end': '10.0.1.250'}]
>
> gateway_ip: '10.0.1.1'
>
> vlan: 2100
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks and regards
>
>
>
> ===============================
>
> *sam.wan(a)dell.com <sam.wan(a)dell.com>*
>
> *E-LAB*
>
> *Dell **EMC** | Technical Operations IEO*
>
> *Phone: **+86 (28) 82966713*
>
>
>
> *From:* wodel youchi <wodel.youchi(a)gmail.com>
> *Sent:* 2021年8月11日 20:42
> *To:* Wan, Sam
> *Cc:* users(a)lists.rdoproject.org
> *Subject:* Re: [rdo-users] Error creating network isolation file
>
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> After re-reading the documentation, I found another document that explains
> that there were new modifications in Wallaby (https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/deplo...
> [docs.openstack.org]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guid...>
> ).
>
> The document points to other links like this one (https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/featu...
> [docs.openstack.org]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guid...>),
> it's really hard to follow and understand the documentation.
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
> [avast.com]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=ema...>
>
> Virus-free. www.avast.com [avast.com]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=ema...>
>
>
>
> Le mer. 11 août 2021 à 05:25, Wan, Sam <Sam.Wan(a)dell.com> a écrit :
>
> Sorry I see you’ve paste the content of your network_data.yaml.
>
> Please make changes to your network_data.yaml following the sample.
>
>
>
> Thanks and regards
>
>
>
> ===============================
>
> *sam.wan(a)dell.com <sam.wan(a)dell.com>*
>
> *E-LAB*
>
> *Dell **EMC** | Technical Operations IEO*
>
> *Phone: **+86 (28) 82966713*
>
>
>
> *From:* Wan, Sam
> *Sent:* 2021年8月11日 12:23
> *To:* 'wodel youchi'; users(a)lists.rdoproject.org
> *Subject:* RE: [rdo-users] Error creating network isolation file
>
>
>
> Hi Wodel Youchi,
>
>
>
> The error is obvious.
>
> *Additional properties are not allowed ('ip_subnet', 'enabled',
> 'allocation_pools', 'gateway_ip', 'vlan', 'ipv6_subnet',
> 'ipv6_allocation_pools', 'gateway_ipv6' were unexpected) \n\nFailed schema
> validation at :\n 'subnets' is a required property"*
>
>
>
> Seems you’ve specified an unexpected ‘gateway_ipv6’ in ‘Management' network
>
> Could you please share your ‘network_data.yaml' File?
>
>
>
> There’s a link to network-data samples in the documentation you gave
> however it’s broken.
>
> Create and Edit network data YAML definition file¶ [docs.openstack.org]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guid...>
>
> Use the network-data-samples [opendev.org]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-heat-tem...>
> (broken) in tripleo-heat-templates [opendev.org]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-heat-tem...> as
> a reference and customize the networks, IP addressing, VLANs, etc., as per
> the cluster requirements.
>
>
>
>
>
> But you can still find a sample in the source: https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/src/branch/stable/wa...
> [opendev.org]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-heat-tem...>
>
> And there’s an example with gateway_ipv6, it should be in the subnets
> property.
>
>
>
> You might need to change your network-data.yaml following this sample.
>
>
>
> Thanks and regards
>
>
>
> ===============================
>
> *sam.wan(a)dell.com <sam.wan(a)dell.com>*
>
> *E-LAB*
>
> *Dell **EMC** | Technical Operations IEO*
>
> *Phone: **+86 (28) 82966713*
>
>
>
> *From:* users <users-bounces(a)lists.rdoproject.org> *On Behalf Of *wodel
> youchi
> *Sent:* 2021年8月5日 0:22
> *To:* users(a)lists.rdoproject.org
> *Subject:* [rdo-users] Error creating network isolation file
>
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> Hi,
>
> A newbie in Openstack, I am deploying an overcloud using the Wallaby
> version.
>
> I am using "container-tools 3.0 [e]"
>
>
>
> I am trying to create the networks-deployed-environment.yaml file using :
>
> *openstack overcloud network provision -o
> /home/stack/templates/networks-deployed-environment.yaml
> /home/stack/templates/network_data.yaml *
>
> I am following this documentation : https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/featu...
> [docs.openstack.org]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guid...>
>
>
>
> But I am getting these errors on all networks defined in network_data.yaml:
>
>
> *2021-08-04 17:13:54.071521 | 52540075-9baf-e063-4b37-00000000000e |
> FATAL | Create/Update composable networks | localhost | item={'name':
> 'Management', 'enabled': True, 'vip': False, 'name_lower': 'management',
> 'vlan': 60, 'ip_subnet': '10.0.1.0/24 [10.0.1.0]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/10.0.1.0/24__;!!LpKI!xc4qNPJ0garbZ7l0yI...>',
> 'allocation_pools': [{'start': '10.0.1.4', 'end': '10.0.1.250'}],
> 'gateway_ip': '10.0.1.1', 'gateway_ipv6': 'fd00:fd00:fd00:6000::1',
> 'ipv6_subnet': 'fd00:fd00:fd00:6000::/64', 'ipv6_allocation_pools':
> [{'start': 'fd00:fd00:fd00:6000::10', 'end':
> 'fd00:fd00:fd00:6000:ffff:ffff:ffff:fffe'}], 'mtu': 1500} |
> error={"ansible_index_var": "idx", "ansible_loop_var": "item", "changed":
> false, "idx": 5, "item": {"allocation_pools": [{"end": "10.0.1.250",
> "start": "10.0.1.4"}], "enabled": true, "gateway_ip": "10.0.1.1",
> "gateway_ipv6": "fd00:fd00:fd00:6000::1", "ip_subnet": "10.0.1.0/24
> [10.0.1.0]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/10.0.1.0/24__;!!LpKI!xc4qNPJ0garbZ7l0yI...>",
> "ipv6_allocation_pools": [{"end":
> "fd00:fd00:fd00:6000:ffff:ffff:ffff:fffe", "start":
> "fd00:fd00:fd00:6000::10"}], "ipv6_subnet": "fd00:fd00:fd00:6000::/64",
> "mtu": 1500, "name": "Management", "name_lower": "management", "vip":
> false, "vlan": 60}, "msg": "Failed schema validation at :\n Additional
> properties are not allowed ('ip_subnet', 'enabled', 'allocation_pools',
> 'gateway_ip', 'vlan', 'ipv6_subnet', 'ipv6_allocation_pools',
> 'gateway_ipv6' were unexpected)\n\nFailed schema validation at :\n
> 'subnets' is a required property"} ......*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Here is my network_data.yaml :
>
> - name: Storage
> vip: true
> vlan: 1107
> name_lower: storage
> ip_subnet: '10.100.7.0/24 [10.100.7.0]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/10.100.7.0/24__;!!LpKI!xc4qNPJ0garbZ7l0...>
> '
> allocation_pools: [{'start': '10.100.7.150', 'end': '10.100.7.250'}]
> mtu: 1500
> - name: StorageMgmt
> name_lower: storage_mgmt
> vip: true
> vlan: 1108
> ip_subnet: '10.100.8.0/24 [10.100.8.0]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/10.100.8.0/24__;!!LpKI!xc4qNPJ0garbZ7l0...>
> '
> allocation_pools: [{'start': '10.100.8.150', 'end': '10.100.8.250'}]
> mtu: 1500
> - name: InternalApi
> name_lower: internal_api
> vip: true
> vlan: 1105
> ip_subnet: '10.100.5.0/24 [10.100.5.0]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/10.100.5.0/24__;!!LpKI!xc4qNPJ0garbZ7l0...>
> '
> allocation_pools: [{'start': '10.100.5.150', 'end': '10.100.5.250'}]
> mtu: 1500
> - name: Tenant
> vip: false # Tenant network does not use VIPs
> name_lower: tenant
> vlan: 1106
> ip_subnet: '10.100.6.0/24 [10.100.6.0]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/10.100.6.0/24__;!!LpKI!xc4qNPJ0garbZ7l0...>
> '
> allocation_pools: [{'start': '10.100.6.150', 'end': '10.100.6.250'}]
> mtu: 1500
> - name: External
> vip: true
> name_lower: external
> vlan: 2100
> ip_subnet: '10.0.1.0/24 [10.0.1.0]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/10.0.1.0/24__;!!LpKI!xc4qNPJ0garbZ7l0yI...>
> '
> allocation_pools: [{'start': '10.0.1.4', 'end': '10.0.1.250'}]
> gateway_ip: '10.0.1.1'
> mtu: 1500
>
>
>
> What I am missing.
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
> [avast.com]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=ema...>
>
> Virus-free. www.avast.com [avast.com]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=ema...>
>
>
>
[View Less]
3 years, 4 months
Connect instance to Internet directly
by wodel youchi
Hi,
Could instances be connected directly to the Internet with public IPs
without NAT?
If yes, how to do that?
And when using DVR, how to do the same? does the compute nodes need to have
public IPs?
I am a newbie, and I don't fully understand openstack.
Regards.
3 years, 4 months
[rdo-dev] [Meeting] RDO meeting (2021-08-11) minutes
by Joel Capitao
==============================
#rdo: RDO meeting - 2021-08-11
==============================
Meeting started by jcapitao at 14:01:22 UTC. The full logs are
available athttps://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/rdo_meeting___2021_08_11/2021/rdo...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* roll call (jcapitao, 14:01:28)
* RDO Xena and release it on CS8 - plan B (jcapitao, 14:07:12)
* RDO Xena will be first released on CS8 (jcapitao, 14:23:11)
* RDO Xena will be released on CS9 later when it'…
[View More]s available
(jcapitao, 14:23:31)
* RDO Trunk repos for centos-[queens|rocky|stein] stopped (jcapitao,
14:32:47)
* LINK:
https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/c/software-factory/sf-infra/+/22460
(jcapitao, 14:34:00)
* chair for next week (jcapitao, 14:43:42)
* ACTION: ykarel to chair next week (jcapitao, 14:46:31)
* Open floor (jcapitao, 14:47:02)
Meeting ended at 14:56:07 UTC.
People present (lines said)
---------------------------
* jcapitao (36)
* spotz (18)
* marios|ruck (15)
* apevec (10)
* opendevmeet (8)
* tkajinam (6)
* weshay|ruck (4)
* tosky (2)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
[View Less]
3 years, 4 months
Re: [rdo-users] Error creating network isolation file
by wodel youchi
Hi,
After re-reading the documentation, I found another document that explains
that there were new modifications in Wallaby (
https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/deplo...
).
The document points to other links like this one (
https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/featu...),
it's really hard to follow and understand the documentation.
Regards.
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_camp...&…
[View More]gt;
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_camp...>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
Le mer. 11 août 2021 à 05:25, Wan, Sam <Sam.Wan(a)dell.com> a écrit :
> Sorry I see you’ve paste the content of your network_data.yaml.
>
> Please make changes to your network_data.yaml following the sample.
>
>
>
> Thanks and regards
>
>
>
> ===============================
>
> *sam.wan(a)dell.com <sam.wan(a)dell.com>*
>
> *E-LAB*
>
> *Dell **EMC** | Technical Operations IEO*
>
> *Phone: **+86 (28) 82966713*
>
>
>
> *From:* Wan, Sam
> *Sent:* 2021年8月11日 12:23
> *To:* 'wodel youchi'; users(a)lists.rdoproject.org
> *Subject:* RE: [rdo-users] Error creating network isolation file
>
>
>
> Hi Wodel Youchi,
>
>
>
> The error is obvious.
>
> *Additional properties are not allowed ('ip_subnet', 'enabled',
> 'allocation_pools', 'gateway_ip', 'vlan', 'ipv6_subnet',
> 'ipv6_allocation_pools', 'gateway_ipv6' were unexpected) \n\nFailed schema
> validation at :\n 'subnets' is a required property"*
>
>
>
> Seems you’ve specified an unexpected ‘gateway_ipv6’ in ‘Management' network
>
> Could you please share your ‘network_data.yaml' File?
>
>
>
> There’s a link to network-data samples in the documentation you gave
> however it’s broken.
>
> Create and Edit network data YAML definition file¶
> <https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/featu...>
>
> Use the network-data-samples
> <https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/network-data-samples>
> (broken) in tripleo-heat-templates
> <https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates> as a reference and
> customize the networks, IP addressing, VLANs, etc., as per the cluster
> requirements.
>
>
>
>
>
> But you can still find a sample in the source:
> https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/src/branch/stable/wa...
>
> And there’s an example with gateway_ipv6, it should be in the subnets
> property.
>
>
>
> You might need to change your network-data.yaml following this sample.
>
>
>
> Thanks and regards
>
>
>
> ===============================
>
> *sam.wan(a)dell.com <sam.wan(a)dell.com>*
>
> *E-LAB*
>
> *Dell **EMC** | Technical Operations IEO*
>
> *Phone: **+86 (28) 82966713*
>
>
>
> *From:* users <users-bounces(a)lists.rdoproject.org> *On Behalf Of *wodel
> youchi
> *Sent:* 2021年8月5日 0:22
> *To:* users(a)lists.rdoproject.org
> *Subject:* [rdo-users] Error creating network isolation file
>
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> Hi,
>
> A newbie in Openstack, I am deploying an overcloud using the Wallaby
> version.
>
> I am using "container-tools 3.0 [e]"
>
>
>
> I am trying to create the networks-deployed-environment.yaml file using :
>
> *openstack overcloud network provision -o
> /home/stack/templates/networks-deployed-environment.yaml
> /home/stack/templates/network_data.yaml *
>
> I am following this documentation : https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/featu...
> [docs.openstack.org]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guid...>
>
>
>
> But I am getting these errors on all networks defined in network_data.yaml:
>
>
> *2021-08-04 17:13:54.071521 | 52540075-9baf-e063-4b37-00000000000e |
> FATAL | Create/Update composable networks | localhost | item={'name':
> 'Management', 'enabled': True, 'vip': False, 'name_lower': 'management',
> 'vlan': 60, 'ip_subnet': '10.0.1.0/24 [10.0.1.0]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/10.0.1.0/24__;!!LpKI!xc4qNPJ0garbZ7l0yI...>',
> 'allocation_pools': [{'start': '10.0.1.4', 'end': '10.0.1.250'}],
> 'gateway_ip': '10.0.1.1', 'gateway_ipv6': 'fd00:fd00:fd00:6000::1',
> 'ipv6_subnet': 'fd00:fd00:fd00:6000::/64', 'ipv6_allocation_pools':
> [{'start': 'fd00:fd00:fd00:6000::10', 'end':
> 'fd00:fd00:fd00:6000:ffff:ffff:ffff:fffe'}], 'mtu': 1500} |
> error={"ansible_index_var": "idx", "ansible_loop_var": "item", "changed":
> false, "idx": 5, "item": {"allocation_pools": [{"end": "10.0.1.250",
> "start": "10.0.1.4"}], "enabled": true, "gateway_ip": "10.0.1.1",
> "gateway_ipv6": "fd00:fd00:fd00:6000::1", "ip_subnet": "10.0.1.0/24
> [10.0.1.0]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/10.0.1.0/24__;!!LpKI!xc4qNPJ0garbZ7l0yI...>",
> "ipv6_allocation_pools": [{"end":
> "fd00:fd00:fd00:6000:ffff:ffff:ffff:fffe", "start":
> "fd00:fd00:fd00:6000::10"}], "ipv6_subnet": "fd00:fd00:fd00:6000::/64",
> "mtu": 1500, "name": "Management", "name_lower": "management", "vip":
> false, "vlan": 60}, "msg": "Failed schema validation at :\n Additional
> properties are not allowed ('ip_subnet', 'enabled', 'allocation_pools',
> 'gateway_ip', 'vlan', 'ipv6_subnet', 'ipv6_allocation_pools',
> 'gateway_ipv6' were unexpected)\n\nFailed schema validation at :\n
> 'subnets' is a required property"} ......*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Here is my network_data.yaml :
>
> - name: Storage
> vip: true
> vlan: 1107
> name_lower: storage
> ip_subnet: '10.100.7.0/24 [10.100.7.0]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/10.100.7.0/24__;!!LpKI!xc4qNPJ0garbZ7l0...>
> '
> allocation_pools: [{'start': '10.100.7.150', 'end': '10.100.7.250'}]
> mtu: 1500
> - name: StorageMgmt
> name_lower: storage_mgmt
> vip: true
> vlan: 1108
> ip_subnet: '10.100.8.0/24 [10.100.8.0]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/10.100.8.0/24__;!!LpKI!xc4qNPJ0garbZ7l0...>
> '
> allocation_pools: [{'start': '10.100.8.150', 'end': '10.100.8.250'}]
> mtu: 1500
> - name: InternalApi
> name_lower: internal_api
> vip: true
> vlan: 1105
> ip_subnet: '10.100.5.0/24 [10.100.5.0]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/10.100.5.0/24__;!!LpKI!xc4qNPJ0garbZ7l0...>
> '
> allocation_pools: [{'start': '10.100.5.150', 'end': '10.100.5.250'}]
> mtu: 1500
> - name: Tenant
> vip: false # Tenant network does not use VIPs
> name_lower: tenant
> vlan: 1106
> ip_subnet: '10.100.6.0/24 [10.100.6.0]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/10.100.6.0/24__;!!LpKI!xc4qNPJ0garbZ7l0...>
> '
> allocation_pools: [{'start': '10.100.6.150', 'end': '10.100.6.250'}]
> mtu: 1500
> - name: External
> vip: true
> name_lower: external
> vlan: 2100
> ip_subnet: '10.0.1.0/24 [10.0.1.0]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/10.0.1.0/24__;!!LpKI!xc4qNPJ0garbZ7l0yI...>
> '
> allocation_pools: [{'start': '10.0.1.4', 'end': '10.0.1.250'}]
> gateway_ip: '10.0.1.1'
> mtu: 1500
>
>
>
> What I am missing.
>
> Regards.
>
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_camp...>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_camp...>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
[View Less]
3 years, 4 months