From my past discussions with the Ceph team, it doesn't look like

David, Following up on the discussion today on etherpad at the RDO, is there any workaround to install Ceph Jewel (which requires epel) until download.ceph.com includes no dependencies to epel? Thanks, IB __ Ignacio Bravo LTG Federal, Inc www.ltgfederal.com

Does this seem like something that makes sense for a Copr setup? (I ask this because because I'm a nub when it comes to Copr; I read about it today and it sounds like perhaps the appropriate tool?) Leif. On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:51 PM, David Moreau Simard <dms(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > >From my past discussions with the Ceph team, it doesn't look like > there are plans to provide upstream self-contained repositories for > Ceph, at least in the short term. > > I reached out today to the maintainer of the Ceph storage SIG repository > [1]. > Right now, Hammer is available and is included when you install > "centos-release-openstack-mitaka" on CentOS. > > There are no plans to provide the Infernalis release but they really > want to ship Jewel as it will be a long lived and supported version. > The current estimate for Jewel brings us to the summer. > > It's all down to time constraints, it seems like they could use some > help if anyone is interested in providing assistance with this > initiative. > > If nothing has changed, the only dependency that isn't provided out of > the box is leveldb. > Perhaps another alternative would be to bring leveldb into the base OS > repositories but that seems unlikely unless someone is willing to do > that work. > This is definitely uncharted territory for me. > > [1]: https://github.com/CentOS-Storage-SIG/ceph > > David Moreau Simard > Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO > > dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter] > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Ignacio Bravo <ibravo(a)ltgfederal.com&gt; > wrote: > > David, > > > > Following up on the discussion today on etherpad at the RDO, is there > > any > > workaround to install Ceph Jewel (which requires epel) until > > download.ceph.com includes no dependencies to epel? > > > > Thanks, > > IB > > > > > > > > __ > > Ignacio Bravo > > LTG Federal, Inc > > www.ltgfederal.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rdo-list mailing list > Rdo-list(a)redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list > > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com -- Leif Madsen | Partner Engineer - NFV & CI NFV Partner Engineering Red Hat GPG: (D670F846) BEE0 336E 5406 42BA 6194 6831 B38A 291E D670 F846 _______________________________________________ Rdo-list mailing list Rdo-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com

Jewel has orders of magnitude improvements vs prior versions, so I’ll vote to have the latest release if possible in the shorter timeframe. IB __ Ignacio Bravo LTG Federal, Inc www.ltgfederal.com On Apr 28, 2016, at 10:08 PM, François Cami <fcami(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: Hi, If that makes more sense for RDO, I'll prioritize rebuilding Jewel for CentOS (Storage SIG) next week instead of validating the latest Hammer rebuild. Ignacio, Leif, David, does that work better for you? François (CentOS Ceph Storage SIG maintainer) On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Leif Madsen <lmadsen(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: Does this seem like something that makes sense for a Copr setup? (I ask this because because I'm a nub when it comes to Copr; I read about it today and it sounds like perhaps the appropriate tool?) Leif. On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:51 PM, David Moreau Simard <dms(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: From my past discussions with the Ceph team, it doesn't look like there are plans to provide upstream self-contained repositories for Ceph, at least in the short term. I reached out today to the maintainer of the Ceph storage SIG repository [1]. Right now, Hammer is available and is included when you install "centos-release-openstack-mitaka" on CentOS. There are no plans to provide the Infernalis release but they really want to ship Jewel as it will be a long lived and supported version. The current estimate for Jewel brings us to the summer. It's all down to time constraints, it seems like they could use some help if anyone is interested in providing assistance with this initiative. If nothing has changed, the only dependency that isn't provided out of the box is leveldb. Perhaps another alternative would be to bring leveldb into the base OS repositories but that seems unlikely unless someone is willing to do that work. This is definitely uncharted territory for me. [1]: https://github.com/CentOS-Storage-SIG/ceph David Moreau Simard Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter] On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Ignacio Bravo <ibravo(a)ltgfederal.com&gt; wrote: David, Following up on the discussion today on etherpad at the RDO, is there any workaround to install Ceph Jewel (which requires epel) until download.ceph.com includes no dependencies to epel? Thanks, IB __ Ignacio Bravo LTG Federal, Inc www.ltgfederal.com _______________________________________________ Rdo-list mailing list Rdo-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com -- Leif Madsen | Partner Engineer - NFV & CI NFV Partner Engineering Red Hat GPG: (D670F846) BEE0 336E 5406 42BA 6194 6831 B38A 291E D670 F846 _______________________________________________ Rdo-list mailing list Rdo-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com _______________________________________________ Rdo-list mailing list Rdo-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com