Jewel has orders of magnitude improvements vs prior versions, so I’ll vote to have the latest release if possible in the shorter timeframe.

IB

__
Ignacio Bravo
LTG Federal, Inc
www.ltgfederal.com


On Apr 28, 2016, at 10:08 PM, François Cami <fcami@redhat.com> wrote:

Hi,

If that makes more sense for RDO, I'll prioritize rebuilding Jewel for
CentOS (Storage SIG) next week instead of validating the latest Hammer
rebuild.

Ignacio, Leif, David, does that work better for you?

François (CentOS Ceph Storage SIG maintainer)

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Leif Madsen <lmadsen@redhat.com> wrote:
Does this seem like something that makes sense for a Copr setup? (I ask this
because because I'm a nub when it comes to Copr; I read about it today and
it sounds like perhaps the appropriate tool?)

Leif.

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:51 PM, David Moreau Simard <dms@redhat.com> wrote:

From my past discussions with the Ceph team, it doesn't look like
there are plans to provide upstream self-contained repositories for
Ceph, at least in the short term.

I reached out today to the maintainer of the Ceph storage SIG repository
[1].
Right now, Hammer is available and is included when you install
"centos-release-openstack-mitaka" on CentOS.

There are no plans to provide the Infernalis release but they really
want to ship Jewel as it will be a long lived and supported version.
The current estimate for Jewel brings us to the summer.

It's all down to time constraints, it seems like they could use some
help if anyone is interested in providing assistance with this
initiative.

If nothing has changed, the only dependency that isn't provided out of
the box is leveldb.
Perhaps another alternative would be to bring leveldb into the base OS
repositories but that seems unlikely unless someone is willing to do
that work.
This is definitely uncharted territory for me.

[1]: https://github.com/CentOS-Storage-SIG/ceph

David Moreau Simard
Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO

dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]


On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Ignacio Bravo <ibravo@ltgfederal.com>
wrote:
David,

Following up on the discussion today on etherpad at the RDO, is there
any
workaround to install Ceph Jewel (which requires epel) until
download.ceph.com includes no dependencies to epel?

Thanks,
IB



__
Ignacio Bravo
LTG Federal, Inc
www.ltgfederal.com


_______________________________________________
Rdo-list mailing list
Rdo-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list

To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com




--
Leif Madsen | Partner Engineer - NFV & CI
NFV Partner Engineering
Red Hat
GPG: (D670F846) BEE0 336E 5406 42BA 6194  6831 B38A 291E D670 F846

_______________________________________________
Rdo-list mailing list
Rdo-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list

To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com

_______________________________________________
Rdo-list mailing list
Rdo-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list

To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com