Re: [Rdo-list] Packstack Icehouse changes

Have you installed centos-SCL repo? Regards, --- JuanFra Rodriguez Cardoso 2014-06-27 9:30 GMT+02:00 Madko <madko77(a)gmail.com&gt;: No more luck :( > I can't even install foreman due to this bug => > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091564 > any idea how to make it work? > > > 2014-06-26 18:03 GMT+02:00 Kun Huang <gareth(a)openstacker.org&gt;: > >> btw, the lastest reference should be this one? >> >> >> https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Lin... >> >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Madko <madko77(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> > Thanks, I will give it a try. I hope with more luck than packstack. >> > >> > >> > 2014-06-26 16:59 GMT+02:00 JuanFra Rodriguez Cardoso >> > <juanfra.rodriguez.cardoso(a)gmail.com&gt;: >> > >> >> Foreman is the right tool! ;) >> >> Red Hat has great docs about it: >> >> >> https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Lin... >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> --- >> >> JuanFra Rodriguez Cardoso >> >> >> >> >> >> 2014-06-26 16:52 GMT+02:00 Madko <madko77(a)gmail.com&gt;: >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> 2014-06-26 16:44 GMT+02:00 Jakub Ruzicka <jruzicka(a)redhat.com&gt;: >> >>> >> >>>> On 26.6.2014 15:33, Perry Myers wrote: >> >>>> > On 06/26/2014 09:23 AM, Shake Chen wrote: >> >>>> >> remove the feature the packstack have been own is not good idea, >> and >> >>>> >> would affect many user. >> >>>> > >> >>>> > Part of the reason for the reduction in scope of Packstack is due >> to >> >>>> > resource constraints for the team that is working on Packstack, >> Puppet >> >>>> > and Foreman. >> >>>> > >> >>>> > If we could get some folks outside of Red Hat to become upstream >> >>>> > contributors and more importantly maintainers of Packstack, then >> that >> >>>> > would alleviate some of the scope creep concerns and perhaps >> Packstack >> >>>> > could be expanded a bit. >> >>>> > >> >>>> > But right now with the majority of the effort solely coming from a >> >>>> > handful of Red Hatters, we just don't have the bandwidth and >> hence the >> >>>> > scope of Packstack was reduced to be purely an all-in-one/demo >> tool. >> >>>> >> >>>> Well, it was created as a proof-of-concept/demo tool in the first >> place. >> >>>> >> >>>> If you want sophisticated multi-node installer, packstack isn't the >> >>>> right tool for that job. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> Good to know, what is the right tool for that job? I mean multi-node >> >>> installer. >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Cheers >> >>>> Jakub >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> Rdo-list mailing list >> >>>> Rdo-list(a)redhat.com >> >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Best regards, >> >>> -- >> >>> Edouard Bourguignon >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Rdo-list mailing list >> >>> Rdo-list(a)redhat.com >> >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Edouard Bourguignon >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Rdo-list mailing list >> > Rdo-list(a)redhat.com >> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list >> > >> > > > > -- > Edouard Bourguignon >