Re: [Rdo-list] RDO packages for Marconi and Barbican
I fully agree with Mark.... at incubation, we know it is coming. If packaging for RDO is a
major issue, this should be fed back to the project and the TC as a barrier to be overcome
before evolution to a new status.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: rdo-list-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:rdo-list-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Mark
McLoughlin
Sent: 15 December 2013 15:25
To: Perry Myers
Cc: rdo-list; dpal(a)redhat.com; Flavio Percoco; Adam Young
Subject: Re: [Rdo-list] RDO packages for Marconi and Barbican
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 13:37 -0500, Perry Myers wrote:
> All valid points Dmitri, but not relevant to whether or not we package
> up Barbican for use by the RDO community.
>
> My take is that once a project is incubated, we need to put someone on
> that project to at the least help package it. Barbican isn't there
> yet, but we'll have to watch and when it's ready we'll do that work.
>
> We should not gate RDO packaging of Barbican on whether or not it can
> use FreeIPA/Dogtag as a backend.
Yes, RDO is a "vanilla distribution of upstream OpenStack" - RDO takes what
upstream releases and packages it.
The point that a project is accepted upstream into incubation feels like the right point
to start packaging it and making it available to RDO
users for feedback which may help the project get into shape for graduating from
incubation.
Mark.
_______________________________________________
Rdo-list mailing list
Rdo-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list