August 2016 - dev - Rdo List Archives

by Rich Bowen

To quote from yesterday's RDO IRC meeting: We have basically not had a CentOS Cloud SIG meeting for 2 months. Part of this is because of travel/summer/whatever. I also have a standing conflict with that meeting, which I'm trying to fix. But more than that, I think it's because the Cloud SIG is just a rehash of this meeting, because only RDO is participating. On the one hand, we don't really accomplish much in that meeting when we do have it. On the other hand, it's a way to get RDO in front of another audience. So, I guess I'm asking if people still think it's valuable, and will try to carve out a little time for this each week. Or as was suggested in the meeting, should we attempt to merge the two meetings in some meaningful way, until such time as other Cloud Software communities see a benefit in participating? -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com RDO Community Liaison http://rdoproject.org @RDOCommunity

9 years, 1 month

4
4
0 / 0

[rdo-list] Proposition to get more CI promotions

by Frédéric Lepied

Hi, Our CI promotion system is as if we were running downhill: we cannot stop and the only way to fix issues is to move forward by getting new fixed packages. And it usually takes days before we can get the fixes and by the time we get them we can have other issues appearing and so never being able to have a promotion. I would like to propose an improved way of working to get more CI promotions. When we have failures in our tests, we do like we do today: debug the issues and find the commits that are causing the regression and working with upstream or fixing packaging issues to solve the regression. The proposed improvement to get more CI promotions is, while we wait for the fixes to be ready, to get the oldest commit that is currently causing an issue from the current analysis and to try the previous commits in reverse order to promote before the issues appear. With the database of DLRN we have all the information to be able to implement this backward tries and have more chances to promote. I'm in holidays next week but I wanted to bring this idea before been completely off. WDYT? -- Fred - May the Source be with you

9 years, 1 month

6
9
0 / 0

[rdo-list] Scheduled maintenance of review.rdoproject.org: 2016-08-24 13:30 UTC

by Nicolas Hicher

Hello folks, We plan to upgrade review.rdoproject.org on 2016-08-24 13:30 UTC (next Wednesday). The downtime will be about 1 hour approximately. This is a maintenance upgrade to the last stable version of Software Factory 2.2.3, the changelog is: http://softwarefactory-project.io/r/gitweb?p=software-factory.git;a=blob_... Regards, Software Factory Team, on behalf of rdo-infra

9 years, 1 month

2
2
0 / 0

[rdo-list] python-heat-agent subpackage from openstack-heat-templates

by Steve Baker

Hi All I would like to get some feedback on this packaging change: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/1909 This change creates a new subpackage python-heat-agent out of openstack-heat-templates. Currently image building or boot configuration has to do a number of non-obvious steps to end up with a server ready to perform heat-driven software deployments. The package python-heat-agent installs all dependencies and files required to do this, resulting in a boot config on a pristine image being as simple as: yum -y install https://www.rdoproject.org/repos/rdo-release.rpm yum -y install python-heat-agent systemctl enable os-collect-config systemctl start --no-block os-collect-config python-heat-agent installs one hook which allows configuration via heat templates. The aim is to create another subpackage per configuration tool hook in heat-templates. So python-heat-agent-puppet will install the puppet hook and depend on python-heat-agent and puppet packages. This depends on some upstream heat-templates changes: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:centos-rdo-boot-config As far as TripleO goes, this packaging approach has the potential to eliminate the need for diskimage-builder invoking heat-templates elements, and further reducing the use of tripleo-image-elements - I'd like to have a discussion on openstack-dev around whether there should be a push to remove tripleo-image-elements entirely.

9 years, 1 month

3
3
0 / 0

[rdo-list] Rebuild a newer version of python-crypto ?

by David Moreau Simard

Hi, I'm noticing an issue in the review.rdo gate. We pip install zuul in the nodepool images (presumably for zuul-cloner) which pulls in Paramiko which pulls pycrypto: Collecting pycrypto!=2.4,<3.0,>=2.1 (from paramiko<2.0.0,>=1.8.0->zuul) It looks like if we install crypto from both pip and packages, we're bound to be running into issues like that: ==== Error: /Stage[main]/Glance/Package[openstack-glance]/ensure: change from absent to present failed: Execution of '/bin/yum -d 0 -e 0 -y install openstack-glance' returned 1: Error downloading packages: 1:openstack-glance-13.0.0-0.20160817133141.bfe4d91.el7.centos.noarch: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. Error: Execution of '/bin/yum -d 0 -e 0 -y install openstack-barbican-api' returned 1: Error unpacking rpm package python-crypto-2.6.1-1.el7.x86_64 error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6.1-py2.7.egg-info: cpio: rename failed - Is a directory ==== Reproduced here [1] on a fresh CentOS install with: 1 yum -y install "@Development Tools" python-devel openssl-devel libffi-devel libxml2-devel python-setuptools python-crypto 2 yum -y remove python-crypto 3 easy_install pip 4 pip install pycrypto 5 yum -y install python-crypto I am unable to reproduce the issue on Fedora. CentOS extras (and RDO) has python-crypto-2.6.1-1.el7.centos.x86_64 (2014) while Fedora has python-crypto-2.6.1-10.fc24 (2016). Can we update the version we have in RDO ? Or is there some other root cause I'm missing ? [1]: http://pastebin.centos.org/52006/raw/ David Moreau Simard Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]

9 years, 1 month

3
3
0 / 0

[rdo-list] Unanswered RDO questions, ask.openstack.org

by Rich Bowen

We've got the unanswered list down to the lowest level yet, so it's a little less overwhelming now. Thanks, everyone! 25 unanswered questions: "Parameter outiface failed on Firewall" during installation of openstack rdo on centos 7 https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/95657/parameter-outiface-failed-on-... Tags: rdo, devstack#mitaka multi nodes provider network ovs config https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/95423/multi-nodes-provider-network-... Tags: rdo, liberty-neutron Adding additional packages to an RDO installation https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/95380/adding-additional-packages-to... Tags: rdo, mistral RDO TripleO Mitaka HA Overcloud Failing https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/95249/rdo-tripleo-mitaka-ha-overclo... Tags: mitaka, tripleo, overcloud, centos7 RDO - is there any fedora package newer than puppet-4.2.1-3.fc24.noarch.rpm https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/94969/rdo-is-there-any-fedora-packa... Tags: rdo, puppet, install-openstack OpenStack RDO mysqld 100% cpu https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/94961/openstack-rdo-mysqld-100-cpu/ Tags: openstack, mysqld, cpu Failed to set RDO repo on host-packstack-centOS-7 https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/94828/failed-to-set-rdo-repo-on-hos... Tags: openstack-packstack, centos7, rdo how to deploy haskell-distributed in RDO? https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/94785/how-to-deploy-haskell-distrib... Tags: rdo rdo tripleO liberty undercloud install failing https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/94023/rdo-tripleo-liberty-underclou... Tags: rdo, rdo-manager, liberty, undercloud, instack AWS Ec2 inst Eth port loses IP when attached to linux bridge in Openstack https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/92271/aws-ec2-inst-eth-port-loses-i... Tags: openstack, networking, aws ceilometer: I've installed openstack mitaka. but swift stops working when i configured the pipeline and ceilometer filter https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/92035/ceilometer-ive-installed-open... Tags: ceilometer, openstack-swift, mitaka Keystone authentication: Failed to contact the endpoint. https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/91517/keystone-authentication-faile... Tags: keystone, authenticate, endpoint, murano Liberty RDO: stack resource topology icons are pink https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/91347/liberty-rdo-stack-resource-to... Tags: resource, topology, dashboard, horizon, pink No handlers could be found for logger "oslo_config.cfg" while syncing the glance database https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/91169/no-handlers-could-be-found-fo... Tags: liberty, glance, install-openstack CentOS OpenStack - compute node can't talk https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/88989/centos-openstack-compute-node... Tags: rdo How to setup SWIFT_PROXY_NODE and SWIFT_STORAGE_NODEs separately on RDO Liberty ? https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/88897/how-to-setup-swift_proxy_node... Tags: rdo, liberty, swift, ha VM and container can't download anything from internet https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/88338/vm-and-container-cant-downloa... Tags: rdo, neutron, network, connectivity Fedora22, Liberty, horizon VNC console and keymap=sv with ; and/ https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/87451/fedora22-liberty-horizon-vnc-... Tags: keyboard, map, keymap, vncproxy, novnc OpenStack-Docker driver failed https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/87243/openstack-docker-driver-failed/ Tags: docker, openstack, liberty Routing between two tenants https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/84645/routing-between-two-tenants/ Tags: kilo, fuel, rdo, routing openstack baremetal introspection internal server error https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/82790/openstack-baremetal-introspec... Tags: rdo, ironic-inspector, tripleo Installing openstack using packstack (rdo) failed https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/82473/installing-openstack-using-pa... Tags: rdo, packstack, installation-error, keystone VMware Host Backend causes No valid host was found. Bug ??? https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/79738/vmware-host-backend-causes-no... Tags: vmware, rdo Mutlinode Devstack with two interfaces https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/78615/mutlinode-devstack-with-two-i... Tags: devstack, vlan, openstack Overcloud deployment on VM fails as IP address from DHCP is not assigned https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/66272/overcloud-deployment-on-vm-fa... Tags: overcloud_in_vm -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com RDO Community Liaison http://rdoproject.org @RDOCommunity

9 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[rdo-list] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : RDO meeting

by hguemar＠fedoraproject.org

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: RDO meeting on 2016-08-24 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At rdo(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: RDO IRC meeting [Agenda at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Meeting ](https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Meeting) Every Wednesday on #rdo on Freenode IRC Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/2017/

9 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [rdo-list] Updated mitaka stable images for tripleo

by Wesley Hayutin

We would need to setup yet another pipeline. I can go after that if there is a need and it sounds like there is. I'll reduce the cadence on some of the other jobs to compensate. We are already chewing up quite a bit of the ci.centos.org infra, KB we may need to sync up regarding storage and network bandwidth. I'll wait for KB's ack before proceeding. Thanks Sent from my mobile On Aug 18, 2016 05:05, "Graeme Gillies" <ggillies(a)redhat.com> wrote: On 18/08/16 18:45, Haïkel wrote: > 2016-08-18 9:42 GMT+02:00 Graeme Gillies <ggillies(a)redhat.com>: >> On 18/08/16 17:14, Haïkel wrote: >>> 2016-08-18 6:06 GMT+02:00 Hugh Brock <hbrock(a)redhat.com>: >>>> On Aug 18, 2016 5:48 AM, "Graeme Gillies" <ggillies(a)redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> In a follow up to my previous post about image building in tripleo/RDO, >>>>> do we currently have a timeline, process, or anything else regarding >>>>> when rebuilt tripleo images are rebuilt and uploaded to >>>>> buildlogs.centos.org? E.g. if you look at the mitaka images >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/tripleo_ images/mitaka/cbs/ >>>>> >>>>> They were built back in April. Can we get something in place to have >>>>> them updated more frequently? >>>>> >>> >>> https://ci.centos.org/artifacts/rdo/images/ >> >> If you look under the mitaka directory at this link, you will notice the >> only directory there is delorean. >> >> I'm not talking about delorean, I'm not interested in that. I'm >> interested in images built using the package manifests from >> centos-release-openstack-mitaka and its dependencies (Ceph, qemu-ev, etc). >> >> The images at the link I gave originally are images that were built with >> those CBS, non-delorean, repos >> >> Regards, >> >> Graeme >> > > The thing is there's no automation to periodically rebuild and test > those images. > > Regards, > H. Ok no problem, now we have identified that, how can we go about getting some automation to do this? It would ideally happen everytime we ship a new package in those official channels, but failing, that, could we do this periodically? Regards, Graeme > >>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Graeme >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Graeme Gillies >>>>> Principal Systems Administrator >>>>> Openstack Infrastructure >>>>> Red Hat Australia >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> rdo-list mailing list >>>>> rdo-list(a)redhat.com >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list >>>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com >>>> >>>> Graeme thanks for raising this. >>>> >>>> RDO folks, should we not be building images every time we promote? If we are >>>> doing that, should we not be linking them more obviously? >>>> >>>> -Hugh >>>> >>> >>> Seems like sync is broken. >>> >>> @KB; maybe, I'm missing some context but since John is in PTO, can you >>> look at it? >>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10697 >>> >>> Regards, >>> H. >>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rdo-list mailing list >>>> rdo-list(a)redhat.com >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com >> >> >> -- >> Graeme Gillies >> Principal Systems Administrator >> Openstack Infrastructure >> Red Hat Australia -- Graeme Gillies Principal Systems Administrator Openstack Infrastructure Red Hat Australia _______________________________________________ rdo-list mailing list rdo-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com

9 years, 1 month

2
1
0 / 0

[rdo-list] Updated mitaka stable images for tripleo

by Graeme Gillies

Hi, In a follow up to my previous post about image building in tripleo/RDO, do we currently have a timeline, process, or anything else regarding when rebuilt tripleo images are rebuilt and uploaded to buildlogs.centos.org? E.g. if you look at the mitaka images http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/tripleo_images/mitaka/cbs/ They were built back in April. Can we get something in place to have them updated more frequently? Regards, Graeme -- Graeme Gillies Principal Systems Administrator Openstack Infrastructure Red Hat Australia

9 years, 1 month

6
9
0 / 0

[rdo-list] tripleo-quickstart, undercloud/overcloud-post roles removal and quickstart-role-requirements deprecation

by Wesley Hayutin

Greetings, In order to replace instack-virt-setup [1] the undercloud-post and overcloud roles native to quickstart will be removed. As to not impact current users of TripleO-Quickstart these roles will be moved w/ git history into ansible-role-tripleo-overcloud and ansible-role-tripleo-undercloud-post. This was covered in the latest RDO-Infra meeting [3]. Moving the native quickstart roles may impact the current users of these roles. To prevent anything from breaking we will be pinning the undercloud-post and overcloud roles to the latest known good commit [2]. We'll need [2] merged immediately to begin this work. I will keep the list updated, let me know if anyone has a problem. Thanks! [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-quickstart [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356669/ [3] https://review.rdoproject.org/etherpad/p/rdo-infra-scrum lines 58 - 69

9 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

dev August 2016