10:58 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi, all:
Our company want to provide a customized OpenStack platform, so we need
to package some OpenStack components, and we want to keep the RPMs' name
unique to ones in RDO release. Now we use python setup.py bdist_rpm to
build the package, which is poor in packaging the same project into
several RPMs.
So, my question is belowing:
1, What method does RDO use to package OpenStack RPMs? python setup.py
or rpmbuild
2, Are the packaging configurations open source? Where can I get them?
Thanks
Sam Song
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUOKrWAAoJEPDWvv0r0XeRvnAH/iquU1l3FgyHm4aCsE7xG2P7
hAoH4E/+WDhlvT+cCiK20gCOUK3SKRQuZ0UkJhDiGKj0iTWmntCpQh91+Q9zRa3+
Z9kyUgEfZ9n+InxZB2krxAGx2tfz4pEgVStA3ORFaQttrPQvqJ7T88Nyrg1EzzUU
hr57cGKqnh4vzThXtOMsRj16r6Zze5DfCJXBY2o6uwr9B5khrLBc11+KyITOymas
U2VRQpfRKVjqiofkj5XwzpkKmL8L+m/Zc8Wu4JeF2fyXAoyLNmJD4Mkqv+RNQ1ML
fPGuYFMl6wROyhX7q7f3SqGBqLEXK1YUJTOSCmgLM15iaJn/WkGtCGsk9agO/dU=
=hrGg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
1:12 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 11/10/14 05:58, sam song wrote:
Hi, all:
Our company want to provide a customized OpenStack platform, so we
need to package some OpenStack components, and we want to keep the
RPMs' name unique to ones in RDO release. Now we use python
setup.py bdist_rpm to build the package, which is poor in packaging
the same project into several RPMs.
I wonder whether your needs can be solved as part of RDO. Do you need
to apply some specific patches that are not included in upstream releases?
So, my question is belowing: 1, What method does RDO use to package
OpenStack RPMs? python setup.py or rpmbuild
RDO utilizes Koji and COPR services to build its packages. Meaning, we
don't use bdist_rpm.
2, Are the packaging configurations open source? Where can I get
them?
Of course: that's Red Hat. Have you heard about Oracle Openstack
Icehouse commercial offering? That one is based on top of RDO [0]. ;)
Both packaging configuration [1] and repositories with downstream
patches included on top of upstream releases [2] are available for
anyone. Fork, reuse, contribute.
BTW some of your questions are already answered in RDO FAQ [3].
[0]:
https://openstack.redhat.com/forum/discussion/985/red-hat-welcomes-oracle...
[1]: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/openstack-neutron.git/
[2]: https://github.com/redhat-openstack
[3]: https://openstack.redhat.com/Frequently_Asked_Questions
I hope that helps,
/Ihar
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUOXLzAAoJEC5aWaUY1u57O0wH/AyFdTD/ELUeiDt3yj5o4N7+
Ce9ClSR/mFVHPhOwb+mrN7A2lwd7rX8+Znju6DgYEacBO/SRam4ueHjrWkdTxsxR
Iox+QwpCNnlp1gz5hBWRwX23RWkmZQB5dblYK4T/0/+OlEEw1q5UCvpgTFQHzDL3
SqfhZcIb0AWJB0UjowMhNo4RBscWkTGAe3vmGmsAwLSUU36hhW3fvXeVZsLCTpx4
l9bcGQaI2RZswSsfIiveBRr4xOzO3j+SGdzaGfevBxW5XSZBsFgwddm1x9m1/G6k
1OJP+AMI9VWs1WSrSv8l1EhIMb8BR71bmhTAISifPDxmiyF0GbVtxIHmdjAp8xQ=
=z2s7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
8:56 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/2014 02:12 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
On 11/10/14 05:58, sam song wrote:
> Hi, all:
> Our company want to provide a customized OpenStack platform, so
> we need to package some OpenStack components, and we want to keep
> the RPMs' name unique to ones in RDO release. Now we use python
> setup.py bdist_rpm to build the package, which is poor in
> packaging the same project into several RPMs.
I wonder whether your needs can be solved as part of RDO. Do you
need to apply some specific patches that are not included in
upstream releases?
Yes, what I want to do is the same to RDO does, except the patches are
different.
> So, my question is belowing: 1, What method does RDO use to
> package OpenStack RPMs? python setup.py or rpmbuild
RDO utilizes Koji and COPR services to build its packages. Meaning,
we don't use bdist_rpm.
> 2, Are the packaging configurations open source? Where can I get
> them?
Of course: that's Red Hat. Have you heard about Oracle Openstack
Icehouse commercial offering? That one is based on top of RDO [0].
;)
Both packaging configuration [1] and repositories with downstream
patches included on top of upstream releases [2] are available for
anyone. Fork, reuse, contribute.
BTW some of your questions are already answered in RDO FAQ [3].
[0]:
https://openstack.redhat.com/forum/discussion/985/red-hat-welcomes-oracle...
[1]: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/openstack-neutron.git/
[2]: https://github.com/redhat-openstack [3]:
https://openstack.redhat.com/Frequently_Asked_Questions
I hope that helps, /Ihar
_______________________________________________ Rdo-list mailing
list Rdo-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
That's all information I want! Thank you very much.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUOzFhAAoJEPDWvv0r0XeR6g0IAJ8/cptLkiG9tLORA7WO+Lld
zW2Wilrrz4MyKOIsfqcyFxD8w8pKEdWpHaIt+IoG0LV4zY5h2Kw90MqN6Dmtv+pb
oIslY1OqbN2c005bWpAn0CGuqnfhyQWMlWTfvj+CMxMMjd9VCbc0JtKRT/z3H7oT
D89lhrd8iNE1fim4JC96l1AKs6ZEUYVGS/NMcEg5uAZMNnQlFgh14r/zZJabMCFz
7+FO/5/PTsMq9HpeRN0FiGgYYcOcW7injRw5AunlNLiR4ArQoHq+dFnmgnn62nGb
GtcIDQXX8ot9q9NT86qYhDcrW9E5IuhlUNsG4egNOJNyGShIIlZX9uzEfMgEKlg=
=BDjn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
3:41 a.m.
Yes, what I want to do is the same to RDO does, except the patches
are
different.
Which patches do you want to backport? Please be aware of the cost
creating effectively a fork!
We add only patches to help packaging, security fixes and total blockers.
Otherwise it's vanilla upstream stable releases.
It always pays off in the long run to work upstream and help merge
patches there first.
Cheers,
Alan
6:22 p.m.
I have noticed that the el6-havana branch of Nova [4] is 6-month old, while there were new
OpenStack packages released last week (openstack-nova-2013.2.4-1.el6.src.rpm).
Is [1] the source for the package build system or is there actually another repository
internal to Red Hat?
[4] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/openstack-nova.git/log/?h=el6-havana
On 11 Oct 2014, at 13:12, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Of course: that's Red Hat. Have you heard about Oracle Openstack
Icehouse commercial offering? That one is based on top of RDO [0]. ;)
Both packaging configuration [1] and repositories with downstream
patches included on top of upstream releases [2] are available for
anyone. Fork, reuse, contribute.
BTW some of your questions are already answered in RDO FAQ [3].
[0]:
https://openstack.redhat.com/forum/discussion/985/red-hat-welcomes-oracle...
[1]: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/openstack-neutron.git/
[2]: https://github.com/redhat-openstack
[3]: https://openstack.redhat.com/Frequently_Asked_Questions
I hope that helps,
/Ihar
3:28 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 14/10/14 01:22, Pierre Riteau wrote:
I have noticed that the el6-havana branch of Nova [4] is 6-month
old,
while there were new OpenStack packages released last week
(openstack-nova-2013.2.4-1.el6.src.rpm).
Is [1] the source for the package build system or is there actually
another repository internal to Red Hat?
[4] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/openstack-nova.git/log/?h=el6-havana
I'm not a Nova guy, but AFAIK el6-* branches were retired and replaced
by compound builds from f2* branches (f20 is Havana for fedora20,
fedora19, and el6; f21 is Icehouse for fedora20, el6, and el7; and
master for Juno for fedora-rawhide, fedora20, and el7).
For Fedoras, we build packages in Koji, and we use COPR for EL[67].
AFAIK there are no internal Red Hat repositories for RDO. Obviously, we
have internal repositories for RHOSP where we diverge a bit from
upstream releases.
/Ihar
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUPN6iAAoJEC5aWaUY1u57pv4IAKv3VexvSDlbzy0b9KVSBk6n
omJfFp7R3Yw6pKTrqImO2tgNQZR6vKJKr754bqqTI03ZtY32J/0UATc8c3rwoj7Z
dBOJxiMEKQOcYqD+iva3pC5wnQw5BVLZ6WSsa2NV90zEN2PcNB2cFN77PBeAvia3
gYUKbt6PKc8nHsmXMbJwNLtkqQcY+QDd4J7yPhx6GOl6xhd8NVtVE79/zUyykzVi
3eAiALT2teIUcUCDByi4wrGrwwwtLfF3S9RArSZLdZxCxv6lw8PDnPyMsEW9B6qI
jXWTA8zykg1zcCOoWiZMs/bxfE1RHcpLxLJyRnCdr6CEv6+tGvhDvgh1jL7msFY=
=eWwc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
8:07 a.m.
Indeed, I see that the f20 branch has the corresponding code. The spec file has control
flow to select different patches and configurations depending on the platform.
Thanks Ihar!
On 14 Oct 2014, at 03:28, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I'm not a Nova guy, but AFAIK el6-* branches were retired and
replaced
by compound builds from f2* branches (f20 is Havana for fedora20,
fedora19, and el6; f21 is Icehouse for fedora20, el6, and el7; and
master for Juno for fedora-rawhide, fedora20, and el7).
For Fedoras, we build packages in Koji, and we use COPR for EL[67].
AFAIK there are no internal Red Hat repositories for RDO. Obviously, we
have internal repositories for RHOSP where we diverge a bit from
upstream releases.
3:28 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 14/10/14 01:22, Pierre Riteau wrote:
I have noticed that the el6-havana branch of Nova [4] is 6-month
old,
while there were new OpenStack packages released last week
(openstack-nova-2013.2.4-1.el6.src.rpm).
Is [1] the source for the package build system or is there actually
another repository internal to Red Hat?
[4] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/openstack-nova.git/log/?h=el6-havana
I'm not a Nova guy, but AFAIK el6-* branches were retired and replaced
by compound builds from f2* branches (f20 is Havana for fedora20,
fedora19, and el6; f21 is Icehouse for fedora20, el6, and el7; and
master for Juno for fedora-rawhide, fedora20, and el7).
For Fedoras, we build packages in Koji, and we use COPR for EL[67].
AFAIK there are no internal Red Hat repositories for RDO. Obviously, we
have internal repositories for RHOSP where we diverge a bit from
upstream releases.
/Ihar
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUPN6iAAoJEC5aWaUY1u57pv4IAKv3VexvSDlbzy0b9KVSBk6n
omJfFp7R3Yw6pKTrqImO2tgNQZR6vKJKr754bqqTI03ZtY32J/0UATc8c3rwoj7Z
dBOJxiMEKQOcYqD+iva3pC5wnQw5BVLZ6WSsa2NV90zEN2PcNB2cFN77PBeAvia3
gYUKbt6PKc8nHsmXMbJwNLtkqQcY+QDd4J7yPhx6GOl6xhd8NVtVE79/zUyykzVi
3eAiALT2teIUcUCDByi4wrGrwwwtLfF3S9RArSZLdZxCxv6lw8PDnPyMsEW9B6qI
jXWTA8zykg1zcCOoWiZMs/bxfE1RHcpLxLJyRnCdr6CEv6+tGvhDvgh1jL7msFY=
=eWwc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
3488
days inactive
3491
days old
7 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Alan Pevec -
Ihar Hrachyshka -
Pierre Riteau -
sam song