We're (pbrady, mrunge, me) having this discussion on IRC, just wanted to post it to wider audience who're asleep/just waking up. I was thinking (in future) if it makes sense to mass update RDO bugs with stock responses (like please try w/ blah version, etc) when we move from one version to another (e.g. how Fedora does) to humanly keep up2date with stale bugs, unresponsive reporters, etc. Points of view (slightly edited for readability) -------------- - mrunge: "I like the idea on auto-updating or closing bugs. It's not ideal, but helps to reduce the number of bugs, which were forgotten for whatever reason." - pbrady: "kashyap, I think your suggestion of more involved RDO/Fedora bug triage would obviate the need for that. We kinda got that (auto-updating) automatically when the bugs were in Fedora bugzilla, and since openstack release cadence matched Fedora's. But with the move to separate RDO product (in bugzilla, i.e.) and with the diverging OpenStack and Fedora release cadence, a similar separate mechanism would be useful Re: non openstack project bugs, I suppose fortnightly we could do half the "packaging" call on #rdo to triage distro bugs" Any other constructive opinions? mrunge, pbrady: Don't hesitate to yell if I misrepresented your comments.