You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message has been automatically rejected. If you think that your messages are being rejected in error, contact the mailing list owner at rdo-list-owner(a)redhat.com. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Phill. Whiteside" <phillwuk(a)gmail.com&gt; To: rdo-list(a)redhat.com Cc: Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 22:27:13 +0000 Subject: Re: rdo-list Digest, Vol 45, Issue 7 Re: Packstack My heart sank when I read someone post up that packstack was abandon-ware. I'm so very glad that this does not appear to be the case. I am considering switching my newer machine to be a test machine and using the lower spec one for daily use. The older one has 4GB RAM, so just scrapes in, the newer one does have 8GB and also usb3 to play with adding on Cinder or just an extra resource to Nova. Kindest regards, Phill. On 8 December 2016 at 17:00, <rdo-list-request(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Send rdo-list mailing list submissions to > rdo-list(a)redhat.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > rdo-list-request(a)redhat.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > rdo-list-owner(a)redhat.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of rdo-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: What's in RDO/Packstack/TripleO matrix (Rich Bowen) > 2. Reminder: Red Hat Summit call for papers closes December 16th > (Rich Bowen) > 3. Re: What's in RDO/Packstack/TripleO matrix (Outback Dingo) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 11:00:56 -0500 > From: Rich Bowen <rbowen(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: Udi Kalifon <ukalifon(a)redhat.com&gt; > Cc: &quot;rdo-list(a)redhat.com&quot; <rdo-list(a)redhat.com&gt; > Subject: Re: [rdo-list] What's in RDO/Packstack/TripleO matrix > Message-ID: <cbd4d512-426d-767b-05d6-80670df5135b(a)redhat.com&gt; > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > > > On 12/08/2016 03:15 AM, Udi Kalifon wrote: > > Packstack and TripleO are both openstack installers, but RDO is not an > > installer so you can't compare it with them. Besides, packstack should > > be officially dead. If you still want to compare the capabilities of the > > installers you should probably not compare packages, but features such > > as HA, SSL, IPv6, upgrade support, scaling, customization and more and > > more and more... The list will be endless. > > "in RDO" means "is packaged and available in RDO repos". Whereas for > Packstack and TripleO, it's about whether these things deploy them. This > is a common question, and so one that needs some kind of answer. The > terminology "in" may be misleading. I welcome suggestions. > > And Packstack is most definitely not dead. :-) > > --Rich > > > > > > > > Regards, > > Udi Kalifon; Senior QE; RHOS-UIAutomation > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Rich Bowen <rbowen(a)redhat.com > > <mailto:rbowen@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > As discussed in last week's RDO meeting, I've started a matrix of > what's > > in RDO, Packstack, and TripleO, since this is a common area of > > confusion, as illustrated by some of the survey results. > > > > The first draft of this is at https://www.rdoproject.org/rdo > /matrix/ > > <https://www.rdoproject.org/rdo/matrix/> and > > I'm reasonably sure that it's incomplete and possibly inaccurate. > It's > > based on > > https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/blob/master/rdo.yml > > <https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/blob/master/rdo.yml> > > as a starting point. > > > > I was hoping that some people might have a look at it, correct what > I > > have, and fill in the Packstack and TripleO portions. > > > > At the moment, it's just binary - is this package in this > collection. > > But there's plenty of room there for more information, such as what > > version(s) it is available in, and URLs for more information. > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- > > Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com <mailto:rbowen@redhat.com> > > RDO Community Liaison > > http://rdoproject.org > > @RDOCommunity > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rdo-list mailing list > > rdo-list(a)redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list@redhat.com> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list > > <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list> > > > > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com > > <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com> > > > > > > -- > Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com > RDO Community Liaison > http://rdoproject.org > @RDOCommunity > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 11:10:05 -0500 > From: Rich Bowen <rbowen(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: &quot;rdo-list(a)redhat.com&quot; <rdo-list(a)redhat.com&gt; > Subject: [rdo-list] Reminder: Red Hat Summit call for papers closes > December 16th > Message-ID: <ff0ea771-bf9a-fbe4-26a1-a17428b6a411(a)redhat.com&gt; > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > As in the subject, Red Hat Summit call for papers closes December 16th. > I'm not seeing very many RDO/OpenStack/NFV/etc talks as I am reviewing > submissions, so it's time to get those in! > > https://rh2017.smarteventscloud.com/portal/cfp/ > > > --Rich > > -- > Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com > RDO Community Liaison > http://rdoproject.org > @RDOCommunity > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 11:11:44 -0500 > From: Outback Dingo <outbackdingo(a)gmail.com&gt; > To: Rich Bowen <rbowen(a)redhat.com&gt; > Cc: &quot;rdo-list(a)redhat.com&quot; <rdo-list(a)redhat.com&gt; > Subject: Re: [rdo-list] What's in RDO/Packstack/TripleO matrix > Message-ID: > <CAKYr3zyYC37XYNrsdkU1Z+gJhCS5VKyV0x-W-K1320QgoZF6UA@mail. > gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Rich Bowen <rbowen(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > > On 12/08/2016 03:15 AM, Udi Kalifon wrote: > >> Packstack and TripleO are both openstack installers, but RDO is not an > >> installer so you can't compare it with them. Besides, packstack should > >> be officially dead. If you still want to compare the capabilities of > the > >> installers you should probably not compare packages, but features such > >> as HA, SSL, IPv6, upgrade support, scaling, customization and more and > >> more and more... The list will be endless. > > > > "in RDO" means "is packaged and available in RDO repos". Whereas for > > Packstack and TripleO, it's about whether these things deploy them. This > > is a common question, and so one that needs some kind of answer. The > > terminology "in" may be misleading. I welcome suggestions. > > > > And Packstack is most definitely not dead. :-) > > > > --Rich > > > > and RDO Packstack allows those of us to deploy a working system when > we dont buy into this triple-0 BS ..... I dont need it. > > > > > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Udi Kalifon; Senior QE; RHOS-UIAutomation > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Rich Bowen <rbowen(a)redhat.com > >> <mailto:rbowen@redhat.com>> wrote: > >> > >> As discussed in last week's RDO meeting, I've started a matrix of > what's > >> in RDO, Packstack, and TripleO, since this is a common area of > >> confusion, as illustrated by some of the survey results. > >> > >> The first draft of this is at https://www.rdoproject.org/rdo > /matrix/ > >> <https://www.rdoproject.org/rdo/matrix/> and > >> I'm reasonably sure that it's incomplete and possibly inaccurate. > It's > >> based on > >> https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/blob/master/rdo.yml > >> <https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/blob/master/rdo.yml> > >> as a starting point. > >> > >> I was hoping that some people might have a look at it, correct > what I > >> have, and fill in the Packstack and TripleO portions. > >> > >> At the moment, it's just binary - is this package in this > collection. > >> But there's plenty of room there for more information, such as what > >> version(s) it is available in, and URLs for more information. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> -- > >> Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com <mailto:rbowen@redhat.com> > >> RDO Community Liaison > >> http://rdoproject.org > >> @RDOCommunity > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> rdo-list mailing list > >> rdo-list(a)redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list@redhat.com> > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list > >> <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list> > >> > >> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com > >> <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com> > >> > >> > > > > -- > > Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com > > RDO Community Liaison > > http://rdoproject.org > > @RDOCommunity > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rdo-list mailing list > > rdo-list(a)redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list > > > > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > rdo-list mailing list > rdo-list(a)redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list > > > End of rdo-list Digest, Vol 45, Issue 7 > *************************************** >