Re: Packstack

My heart sank when I read someone post up that packstack was abandon-ware. I'm so very glad that this does not appear to be the case. I am considering switching my newer machine to be a test machine and using the lower spec one for daily use. The older one has 4GB RAM, so just scrapes in, the newer one does have 8GB and also usb3 to play with adding on Cinder or just an extra resource to Nova.

Kindest regards,

Phill.

On 8 December 2016 at 22:27, <rdo-list-owner@redhat.com> wrote:
You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message has
been automatically rejected.  If you think that your messages are
being rejected in error, contact the mailing list owner at
rdo-list-owner@redhat.com.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Phill. Whiteside" <phillwuk@gmail.com>
To: rdo-list@redhat.com
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 22:27:13 +0000
Subject: Re: rdo-list Digest, Vol 45, Issue 7
Re: Packstack

My heart sank when I read someone post up that packstack was abandon-ware. I'm so very glad that this does not appear to be the case. I am considering switching my newer machine to be a test machine and using the lower spec one for daily use. The older one has 4GB RAM, so just scrapes in, the newer one does have 8GB and also usb3 to play with adding on Cinder or just an extra resource to Nova.

Kindest regards,

Phill.

On 8 December 2016 at 17:00, <rdo-list-request@redhat.com> wrote:
Send rdo-list mailing list submissions to
        rdo-list@redhat.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        rdo-list-request@redhat.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
        rdo-list-owner@redhat.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of rdo-list digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: What's in RDO/Packstack/TripleO matrix (Rich Bowen)
   2. Reminder: Red Hat Summit call for papers closes December  16th
      (Rich Bowen)
   3. Re: What's in RDO/Packstack/TripleO matrix (Outback Dingo)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 11:00:56 -0500
From: Rich Bowen <rbowen@redhat.com>
To: Udi Kalifon <ukalifon@redhat.com>
Cc: "rdo-list@redhat.com" <rdo-list@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [rdo-list] What's in RDO/Packstack/TripleO matrix
Message-ID: <cbd4d512-426d-767b-05d6-80670df5135b@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8



On 12/08/2016 03:15 AM, Udi Kalifon wrote:
> Packstack and TripleO are both openstack installers, but RDO is not an
> installer so you can't compare it with them. Besides, packstack should
> be officially dead. If you still want to compare the capabilities of the
> installers you should probably not compare packages, but features such
> as HA, SSL, IPv6, upgrade support, scaling, customization and more and
> more and more... The list will be endless.

"in RDO" means "is packaged and available in RDO repos". Whereas for
Packstack and TripleO, it's about whether these things deploy them. This
is a common question, and so one that needs some kind of answer. The
terminology "in" may be misleading. I welcome suggestions.

And Packstack is most definitely not dead. :-)

--Rich


>
>
> Regards,
> Udi Kalifon; Senior QE; RHOS-UIAutomation
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Rich Bowen <rbowen@redhat.com
> <mailto:rbowen@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     As discussed in last week's RDO meeting, I've started a matrix of what's
>     in RDO, Packstack, and TripleO, since this is a common area of
>     confusion, as illustrated by some of the survey results.
>
>     The first draft of this is at https://www.rdoproject.org/rdo/matrix/
>     <https://www.rdoproject.org/rdo/matrix/> and
>     I'm reasonably sure that it's incomplete and possibly inaccurate. It's
>     based on
>     https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/blob/master/rdo.yml
>     <https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/blob/master/rdo.yml>
>     as a starting point.
>
>     I was hoping that some people might have a look at it, correct what I
>     have, and fill in the Packstack and TripleO portions.
>
>     At the moment, it's just binary - is this package in this collection.
>     But there's plenty of room there for more information, such as what
>     version(s) it is available in, and URLs for more information.
>
>     Thanks.
>
>     --
>     Rich Bowen - rbowen@redhat.com <mailto:rbowen@redhat.com>
>     RDO Community Liaison
>     http://rdoproject.org
>     @RDOCommunity
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     rdo-list mailing list
>     rdo-list@redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list@redhat.com>
>     https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>     <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list>
>
>     To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com
>     <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com>
>
>

--
Rich Bowen - rbowen@redhat.com
RDO Community Liaison
http://rdoproject.org
@RDOCommunity



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 11:10:05 -0500
From: Rich Bowen <rbowen@redhat.com>
To: "rdo-list@redhat.com" <rdo-list@redhat.com>
Subject: [rdo-list] Reminder: Red Hat Summit call for papers closes
        December        16th
Message-ID: <ff0ea771-bf9a-fbe4-26a1-a17428b6a411@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

As in the subject, Red Hat Summit call for papers closes December 16th.
I'm not seeing very many RDO/OpenStack/NFV/etc talks as I am reviewing
submissions, so it's time to get those in!

https://rh2017.smarteventscloud.com/portal/cfp/


--Rich

--
Rich Bowen - rbowen@redhat.com
RDO Community Liaison
http://rdoproject.org
@RDOCommunity



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 11:11:44 -0500
From: Outback Dingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com>
To: Rich Bowen <rbowen@redhat.com>
Cc: "rdo-list@redhat.com" <rdo-list@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [rdo-list] What's in RDO/Packstack/TripleO matrix
Message-ID:
        <CAKYr3zyYC37XYNrsdkU1Z+gJhCS5VKyV0x-W-K1320QgoZF6UA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Rich Bowen <rbowen@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/08/2016 03:15 AM, Udi Kalifon wrote:
>> Packstack and TripleO are both openstack installers, but RDO is not an
>> installer so you can't compare it with them. Besides, packstack should
>> be officially dead. If you still want to compare the capabilities of the
>> installers you should probably not compare packages, but features such
>> as HA, SSL, IPv6, upgrade support, scaling, customization and more and
>> more and more... The list will be endless.
>
> "in RDO" means "is packaged and available in RDO repos". Whereas for
> Packstack and TripleO, it's about whether these things deploy them. This
> is a common question, and so one that needs some kind of answer. The
> terminology "in" may be misleading. I welcome suggestions.
>
> And Packstack is most definitely not dead. :-)
>
> --Rich
>

and RDO Packstack allows those of us to deploy a working system when
we dont buy into this triple-0 BS ..... I dont need it.


>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Udi Kalifon; Senior QE; RHOS-UIAutomation
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Rich Bowen <rbowen@redhat.com
>> <mailto:rbowen@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     As discussed in last week's RDO meeting, I've started a matrix of what's
>>     in RDO, Packstack, and TripleO, since this is a common area of
>>     confusion, as illustrated by some of the survey results.
>>
>>     The first draft of this is at https://www.rdoproject.org/rdo/matrix/
>>     <https://www.rdoproject.org/rdo/matrix/> and
>>     I'm reasonably sure that it's incomplete and possibly inaccurate. It's
>>     based on
>>     https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/blob/master/rdo.yml
>>     <https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/blob/master/rdo.yml>
>>     as a starting point.
>>
>>     I was hoping that some people might have a look at it, correct what I
>>     have, and fill in the Packstack and TripleO portions.
>>
>>     At the moment, it's just binary - is this package in this collection.
>>     But there's plenty of room there for more information, such as what
>>     version(s) it is available in, and URLs for more information.
>>
>>     Thanks.
>>
>>     --
>>     Rich Bowen - rbowen@redhat.com <mailto:rbowen@redhat.com>
>>     RDO Community Liaison
>>     http://rdoproject.org
>>     @RDOCommunity
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     rdo-list mailing list
>>     rdo-list@redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list@redhat.com>
>>     https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>     <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list>
>>
>>     To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com
>>     <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Rich Bowen - rbowen@redhat.com
> RDO Community Liaison
> http://rdoproject.org
> @RDOCommunity
>
> _______________________________________________
> rdo-list mailing list
> rdo-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>
> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list


End of rdo-list Digest, Vol 45, Issue 7
***************************************