----- Original Message ----- Yes, the same change should be done for Liberty. About the second question, the last commit from the current source branch (stable/2.2) is older than the latest commit for the previous branch (master), so it is ignored. We can fix that by removing the commits from the DB and manually building the new gnocchiclient (will do now). Regards, Javier

----- Original Message ----- I've rebuilt gnocchiclient for liberty and mitaka. Regards, Javier

Yes , undercloud got built without pre-install osc-lib, stacktrace was eliminated due to rebuilt gnocchiclient . I believe this one python-gnocchiclient-2.2.0-0.20160808141853.04c6ce5.el7.centos.src.rpm<... Tnanks. Boris. ________________________________ From: rdo-list-bounces(a)redhat.com <rdo-list-bounces(a)redhat.com&gt; on behalf of Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets(a)hotmail.com&gt; Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 10:52 AM To: Javier Pena; rdo-list Cc: alan pevec Subject: Re: [rdo-list] New 3rd party testing jobs & the state of the RDO promotion jobs (all blocked) ________________________________ From: rdo-list-bounces(a)redhat.com <rdo-list-bounces(a)redhat.com&gt; on behalf of Javier Pena <javier.pena(a)redhat.com&gt; Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 10:28 AM To: rdo-list Cc: alan pevec Subject: Re: [rdo-list] New 3rd party testing jobs & the state of the RDO promotion jobs (all blocked) ----- Original Message ----- [https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/145846?v=3&s=200]<https:/... Set gnocchiclient mitaka to stable/2.2 · redhat-openstack/rdoinfo@101adb0<https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/commit/101adb09757a852560816a79d1e2c58d2b0cf87e> github.com This is so we dont break mitaka due to a recent change introduced in gnocchi client introducing osc_lib. see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/343877/ Change-Id: I35c82883ef637c92151621255a40c9213d... I've rebuilt gnocchiclient for liberty and mitaka. Does it mean that Mitaka HA instack-virt-setup on CentOS 7.2 VIRTHOST based on delorean repos :- http://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-mitaka/current/delorean.repo http://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-mitaka/delorean-deps.repo will not require any more osc-lib to run `openstack undercloud install` with no errors. If answer is no, how I am supposed to manage to avoid install osc-lib before running `openstack undercloud install` Python tripleoclient has keystoneauth 2.4 what causes trace in BZ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364789 pre-installed osc-lib (on INSTACK VM ) updates it to 2.11 so undercloud gets deployed , but overcloud deployments get affected, which worked fine just several days ago. Please , see 3 use cases in BZ record. Thanks. Boris. Regards, Javier _______________________________________________ rdo-list mailing list rdo-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com

Horizon has started failing to build late friday due to three new dependencies that have been introduced. Work is already in progress, see the other mailing-list thread [1]. [1]: https://www.redhat.com/archives/rdo-list/2016-August/msg00086.html David Moreau Simard Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter] On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Attila Darazs <adarazs(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

Is there a bug open on #30 in the etherpad [1]? 30. TBD the new minimal_pacemaker job fails on the promotion master pipeline [apevec] [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/delorean_master_current_issues On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <amoralej(a)redhat.com > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Attila Darazs <adarazs(a)redhat.com> > Top posting to provide another clean status: > > > > *Master* still fails, and the reason is that our image building job uses > the > > latest consistent repo, which is old: 2016-08-05 17:02[1] > > > > If I understand the DLRN build system correctly[2], then > > "python-django-horizon" package is preventing the current to become > > consistent. Here's the build log[3]. > > > > Can somebody help with this? This is the current blocker for master > > promotion. > > > > Dependencies are fixed and we are consistent since yesterday, but we > still have some issues preventing the promotion of master. Some of > them are reported in the etherpad, but some errors still needs to be > investigated (I'm currently working in issue 31 affecting packstack > scenario001 and 003, but last run puppet scenario002 and both tripleo > jobs failed also. > > > *Mitaka* promotion got past the point where it failed before. Probably > this > > will do the trick for liberty too. (it's at the deploy overcloud step) > > > > Best regards, > > Attila > > > > [1] https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-master/consistent/ > > [2] https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-master/status_report.html > > [3] > > https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-master/21/6e/ > 216e67371764ca329a73d63c6d187283b01db067_7013ec64/rpmbuild.log > > > > > > On 08/08/2016 04:28 PM, Javier Pena wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> > >>> On 08/08/2016 04:05 PM, Javier Pena wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>>> > >>>>> On 08/08/2016 03:44 PM, Alan Pevec wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> osc-lib is newton master only change, how did it end up in > >>>>>> > >>>>>> mitaka/liberty tripleo? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ok, trace shows it is in gnocchiclient, is that build before > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/commit/ > 101adb09757a852560816a79d1e2c58d2b0cf87e > >>>>>> ? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> According to: > >>>>> > >>>>> https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-mitaka/report.html > >>>>> > >>>>> it looks like the latest build of that package is still using the > patch > >>>>> that added osc-lib: > >>>>> > >>>>> [1] > >>>>> > >>>>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/python- > gnocchiclient/commit/?id=dcb53e7040655d48fa96beaf39dd6be22c4f684d > >>>>> > >>>>> So it seems to me we should make the same change for Liberty (I'll > make > >>>>> it), also why didn't the DLRN build trigger after a distgit change? > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Yes, the same change should be done for Liberty. > >>> > >>> > >>> I created a review for it: http://review.rdoproject.org/r/1817 > >>> > >>>> About the second question, the last commit from the current source > >>>> branch > >>>> (stable/2.2) is older than the latest commit for the previous branch > >>>> (master), so it is ignored. We can fix that by removing the commits > from > >>>> the DB and manually building the new gnocchiclient (will do now). > >>> > >>> > >>> Please submit that as well and do the same hack for liberty. > >>> > >> > >> I've rebuilt gnocchiclient for liberty and mitaka. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Javier > >> > >> > >>> Thank you for your help, > >>> Attila > >>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Javier > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Attila > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> rdo-list mailing list > >>>>> rdo-list(a)redhat.com > >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list > >>>>> > >>>>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com > >>>>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> rdo-list mailing list > >>> rdo-list(a)redhat.com > >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list > >>> > >>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com > >>> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rdo-list mailing list > > rdo-list(a)redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list > > > > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com > > _______________________________________________ > rdo-list mailing list > rdo-list(a)redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list > > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com >