On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 4:52 AM, Alan Pevec <apevec(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Numan Siddique <nusiddiq(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > > Hi Alan, > > > > OVS 2.8 is now availalbe [1] and we would like to have it in RDO. > > > > Is it possible to have the OVS 2.8 rpms in candidate repo. I will update > > the > > patch [2] and make sure it passes so that we don't see any regressions > > during update. > > > > [1] - > > > > https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2017-September/045235.... > > [2] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/473191/ > > Hi Numan, > > I've rebased two patches we have in RDO [3] rebuilds, on top of > Timothy's Fedora 28 RPM [4] and it almost worked, only ppc64le arch > build [5] failed with: > > | > /builddir/build/BUILD/openvswitch-2.8.0/dpdk-stable-17.05.1/ppc_64-power8-linuxapp-gcc/lib/librte_eal.a(eal_common_options.o): > In function `eal_plugins_init': > | > /builddir/build/BUILD/openvswitch-2.8.0/dpdk-stable-17.05.1/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c:240: > undefined reference to `dlopen' > | > /builddir/build/BUILD/openvswitch-2.8.0/dpdk-stable-17.05.1/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c:242: > undefined reference to `dlerror' > | collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > ppc64le folks, please help! > Thanks Alan. Hope the build would be resolved soon.

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:16 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Numan Siddique <nusiddiq(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 4:52 AM, Alan Pevec <apevec(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Numan Siddique <nusiddiq(a)redhat.com&gt; > >> wrote: > >> > Hi Alan, > >> > > >> > OVS 2.8 is now availalbe [1] and we would like to have it in RDO. > >> > > >> > Is it possible to have the OVS 2.8 rpms in candidate repo. I will > >> > update > >> > the > >> > patch [2] and make sure it passes so that we don't see any > >> > regressions > >> > during update. > >> > > >> > [1] - > >> > > >> > > >> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2017-September/045235.... > >> > [2] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/473191/ > >> > >> Hi Numan, > >> > >> I've rebased two patches we have in RDO [3] rebuilds, on top of > >> Timothy's Fedora 28 RPM [4] and it almost worked, only ppc64le arch > >> build [5] failed with: > >> > >> | > >> > >> /builddir/build/BUILD/openvswitch-2.8.0/dpdk-stable-17.05.1/ppc_64-power8-linuxapp-gcc/lib/librte_eal.a(eal_common_options.o): > >> In function `eal_plugins_init': > >> | > >> > >> /builddir/build/BUILD/openvswitch-2.8.0/dpdk-stable-17.05.1/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c:240: > >> undefined reference to `dlopen' > >> | > >> > >> /builddir/build/BUILD/openvswitch-2.8.0/dpdk-stable-17.05.1/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c:242: > >> undefined reference to `dlerror' > >> | collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > >> > >> ppc64le folks, please help! > >> > > > > > > Thanks Alan. Hope the build would be resolved soon. > > I looked at this briefly. The compile error is odd, but we wouldn't > even hit that if the initial testcase run completed successfully. > There are two unexpected failures: > > 2355: ovn -- dns lookup : 1 HV, 2 LS, 2 LSPs/LS FAILED (ovn.at:6812) > 2364: ovn -- ensure one gw controller restart in HA doesn't bounce the > master FAILED (ovn.at:8480) This is odd. Are the tests failing consistently ? I will have a look.

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:49 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > I have no idea. Has anyone tried rebuilds? Timothy noted that this > package build successfully for ppc64le in Fedora, so the tests passed > there. He's also going to update the rawhide package to use > dpdk-stable-17.05.2, but I didn't immediately see anything in .2 that > would speak to this. -2 worked https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=19946 Numan, you can test it by adding http://cbs.centos.org/repos/cloud7-openstack-queens-candidate/x86_64/os/ repo in the CI job.

Cheers, Alan