4:48 a.m.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayutin(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Is there a bug open on #30 in the etherpad [1]?
30. TBD the new minimal_pacemaker job fails on the promotion master
pipeline [apevec]
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/delorean_master_current_issues
Note that cinder bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1610073
which was impacting packstack jobs (see issue 31), is affecting
tripleo jobs also (i added some coments and logs in issue 34 ).
Cinder team is working in fix https://review.openstack.org/#/c/353120/
for this bug.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso
<amoralej(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Attila Darazs <adarazs(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > Top posting to provide another clean status:
> >
> > *Master* still fails, and the reason is that our image building job uses
> > the
> > latest consistent repo, which is old: 2016-08-05 17:02[1]
> >
> > If I understand the DLRN build system correctly[2], then
> > "python-django-horizon" package is preventing the current to become
> > consistent. Here's the build log[3].
> >
> > Can somebody help with this? This is the current blocker for master
> > promotion.
> >
>
> Dependencies are fixed and we are consistent since yesterday, but we
> still have some issues preventing the promotion of master. Some of
> them are reported in the etherpad, but some errors still needs to be
> investigated (I'm currently working in issue 31 affecting packstack
> scenario001 and 003, but last run puppet scenario002 and both tripleo
> jobs failed also.
>
> > *Mitaka* promotion got past the point where it failed before. Probably
> > this
> > will do the trick for liberty too. (it's at the deploy overcloud step)
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Attila
> >
> > [1] https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-master/consistent/
> > [2] https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-master/status_report.html
> > [3]
> >
> >
https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-master/21/6e/216e67371764ca329a73d63...
> >
> >
> > On 08/08/2016 04:28 PM, Javier Pena wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>
> >>> On 08/08/2016 04:05 PM, Javier Pena wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 08/08/2016 03:44 PM, Alan Pevec wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> osc-lib is newton master only change, how did it end up
in
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> mitaka/liberty tripleo?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ok, trace shows it is in gnocchiclient, is that build
before
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/commit/101adb09757a852560816a...
> >>>>>> ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> According to:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-mitaka/report.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>> it looks like the latest build of that package is still using
the
> >>>>> patch
> >>>>> that added osc-lib:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/python-gnocchiclient/commit/?id=d...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So it seems to me we should make the same change for Liberty
(I'll
> >>>>> make
> >>>>> it), also why didn't the DLRN build trigger after a distgit
change?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, the same change should be done for Liberty.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I created a review for it: http://review.rdoproject.org/r/1817
> >>>
> >>>> About the second question, the last commit from the current source
> >>>> branch
> >>>> (stable/2.2) is older than the latest commit for the previous
branch
> >>>> (master), so it is ignored. We can fix that by removing the commits
> >>>> from
> >>>> the DB and manually building the new gnocchiclient (will do now).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Please submit that as well and do the same hack for liberty.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I've rebuilt gnocchiclient for liberty and mitaka.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Javier
> >>
> >>
> >>> Thank you for your help,
> >>> Attila
> >>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Javier
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Attila
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> rdo-list mailing list
> >>>>> rdo-list(a)redhat.com
> >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> rdo-list mailing list
> >>> rdo-list(a)redhat.com
> >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> >>>
> >>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
> >>>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rdo-list mailing list
> > rdo-list(a)redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> >
> > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> rdo-list mailing list
> rdo-list(a)redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>
> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com