7:48 p.m.
Hi All,
When trying to install/test RDO on a ppc64le system we hit an issue
that with
---
Error: Package: erlang-sd_notify-0.1-9.el7.ppc64le (delorean-queens-testing)
Requires: erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.11
Available: erlang-erts-R16B-03.18.el7.ppc64le (epel)
erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.4
Available: erlang-erts-18.3.4.5-4.el7.ppc64le (delorean-queens-testing)
erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
Error: Package: erlang-sd_notify-0.1-9.el7.ppc64le (delorean-queens-testing)
Requires: erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.11
Available: erlang-erts-R16B-03.18.el7.ppc64le (epel)
erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.4
Installing: erlang-erts-18.3.4.5-4.el7.ppc64le (delorean-queens-testing)
erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
---
It seems that at the time erlang-sd_notify there was a divergence in the
nif_version provided by ppc64le. You can see that here:
erlang-sd_notify-0.1-9.el7.aarch64.rpm erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
erlang-sd_notify-0.1-9.el7.ppc64le.rpm erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.11
erlang-sd_notify-0.1-9.el7.x86_64.rpm erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
I've rebuilt erlang-sd_notify (https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=270238)
and now the nif_version is consistent:
erlang-sd_notify-0.1-10.el7.aarch64.rpm erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
erlang-sd_notify-0.1-10.el7.ppc64le.rpm erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
erlang-sd_notify-0.1-10.el7.x86_64.rpm erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
Here's where I continue to be confused about how I get this into
queens-testing.
I think the right thing to do is update the
cloud7-openstack-queens-testing version in deps.yaml which I thinkI've
done with https://review.rdoproject.org/r/11040
So am I on the right track to fix this, if not let me know where I've
gone wrong.
Yours Tony.
3:10 a.m.
On 19/12/2017 02:48, Tony Breeds wrote:
Hi All,
When trying to install/test RDO on a ppc64le system we hit an issue
that with
---
Error: Package: erlang-sd_notify-0.1-9.el7.ppc64le (delorean-queens-testing)
Requires: erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.11
Available: erlang-erts-R16B-03.18.el7.ppc64le (epel)
erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.4
Available: erlang-erts-18.3.4.5-4.el7.ppc64le (delorean-queens-testing)
erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
Error: Package: erlang-sd_notify-0.1-9.el7.ppc64le (delorean-queens-testing)
Requires: erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.11
Available: erlang-erts-R16B-03.18.el7.ppc64le (epel)
erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.4
Installing: erlang-erts-18.3.4.5-4.el7.ppc64le (delorean-queens-testing)
erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
---
It seems that at the time erlang-sd_notify there was a divergence in the
nif_version provided by ppc64le. You can see that here:
erlang-sd_notify-0.1-9.el7.aarch64.rpm erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
erlang-sd_notify-0.1-9.el7.ppc64le.rpm erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.11
erlang-sd_notify-0.1-9.el7.x86_64.rpm erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
I've rebuilt erlang-sd_notify (https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=270238)
and now the nif_version is consistent:
erlang-sd_notify-0.1-10.el7.aarch64.rpm erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
erlang-sd_notify-0.1-10.el7.ppc64le.rpm erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
erlang-sd_notify-0.1-10.el7.x86_64.rpm erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
Here's where I continue to be confused about how I get this into
queens-testing.
I think the right thing to do is update the
cloud7-openstack-queens-testing version in deps.yaml which I thinkI've
done with https://review.rdoproject.org/r/11040
So am I on the right track to fix this, if not let me know where I've
gone wrong.
Hi Tony,
You did it right. FYI, we're having issues currently with nodepool so
the gate is down, so do not worry if it is not merged right away.
Yours Tony.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev(a)lists.rdoproject.org
http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
To unsubscribe: dev-unsubscribe(a)lists.rdoproject.org
12:27 a.m.
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:10:57AM +0100, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
You did it right. FYI, we're having issues currently with
nodepool so the
gate is down, so do not worry if it is not merged right away.
Thanks Haïkel for confirming that.
It looks like it's merged. I'll test tomorrow.
Yours Tony.
4:24 p.m.
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Haïkel Guémar <hguemar(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I've rebuilt erlang-sd_notify
> (https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=270238)
What was the source for that build? For deps which are not straight
rebuilds from Fedora distgit we keep distgits at
https://github.com/rdo-common
0.1-9 was Fedora distgit 45549edc0e0e35e990629b8335504184a8a902e6
I can extract the diff from CBS SRPM but would be good to keep
original git history.
I've now created https://github.com/rdo-common/erlang-sd_notify with
0.1-9 please send PR there.
> and now the nif_version is consistent:
> erlang-sd_notify-0.1-10.el7.aarch64.rpm erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
> erlang-sd_notify-0.1-10.el7.ppc64le.rpm erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
> erlang-sd_notify-0.1-10.el7.x86_64.rpm erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
I'm asking b/c I'll need to rebuild it again, b/c Erlang 19 rebase
fails since it brings erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.11,
see https://review.rdoproject.org/r/11091
We probably want to rebase to the latest erlang-sd_notify-1.0 from
Fedora master, @petro ?
Cheers,
Alan
5:59 p.m.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 11:24:44PM +0100, Alan Pevec wrote:
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Haïkel Guémar
<hguemar(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> I've rebuilt erlang-sd_notify
>> (https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=270238)
What was the source for that build? For deps which are not straight
rebuilds from Fedora distgit we keep distgits at
https://github.com/rdo-common
0.1-9 was Fedora distgit 45549edc0e0e35e990629b8335504184a8a902e6
I can extract the diff from CBS SRPM but would be good to keep
original git history.
I've now created https://github.com/rdo-common/erlang-sd_notify with
0.1-9 please send PR there.
PR #1 sent :)
Sorry for the delay
Yours Tony.
2834
days inactive
2849
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Alan Pevec -
Haïkel Guémar -
Tony Breeds