On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 2:52 PM Carlos Goncalves <cgoncalves(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 1:58 PM Alan Pevec <apevec(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> > Octavia roadmap includes adding support to new features and performance
> improvements only available starting in HAProxy 2.0. CentOS 8 ships with
> HAProxy 1.8, and according to the package maintainer there are no plans to
> provide HAProxy 2.x in a foreseeable future.
> > I have rebuilt HAProxy 2.2 from Fedora rawhide against CentOS 8 and
> CentOS Stream in [1] and validated it passed Octavia tests in [2] [3]
> (patchset 3, ignore newer ones).
> > We would like to check if it would be possible to provide the latest
> stable LTS HAProxy 2.2 in RDO repositories.
>
> Since HAProxy is networking related and could be used outside
> OpenStack, I'd like to consider building and hosting it by rebooted
> NFV CentOS SIG.
>
I'll bring the topic in next NFV SIG meeting
We should avoid pilling up deps in RDO repos, adding them is the
last
> option as per our deps guidelines [1]
>
Works for me.
>
> Can you also give us short intro how is haproxy included and used in
> Octavia?
> If it were a containerized service, we might be able to take the
> container image from Openshift/OKD ?
>
The HAProxy RPM is installed in the base operating system,
a non-containerized environment. The amphora provider, the reference
open-source provider, orchestrates the life-cycle of amphorae instances
(service VMs) including HAProxy to deliver load balancing services to
tenant application environments.
haproxy is used out of octavia/amphora to balance across api services,
iirc, so we should check with other consumers in TripleO.
> Cheers,
> Alan
>
> [1]
https://www.rdoproject.org/documentation/requirements/
>
> _______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev(a)lists.rdoproject.org
http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
To unsubscribe: dev-unsubscribe(a)lists.rdoproject.org