12:46 p.m.
Hi,
I'm trying to install on Fedora 22 and ran into a few issues. My first
question is if I should be trying for Juno or Kilo. I haven't been able
to get Kilo working so I switched to Juno. In order to get Juno to go, I
had to edit the rdo-release.repo file and point the baseurl to
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-juno/epel-7/.
Is that the correct way to do it?
I'm installing useing:
packstack --allinone
So, I get an error from mysql (MariaDB) that looks like:
Error: Evaluation Error: Comparison of: String >= Integer, is not
possible. Caused by 'A String is not comparable to a non String'. at
/var/tmp/packstack/8e5b1411ef25462dad1e216ac75fb2ab/modules/mysql/manifests/params.pp:35:82
on node
The file that it is point to nolonger exists so I didn't dig any further.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
1:21 p.m.
*******************************
Setup RDO KIlo (AIO) on Fedora 22
*******************************
# dnf install -y https://rdoproject.org/repos/rdo-release.rpm
# dnf install -y openstack-packstack
# dnf install fedora-repos-rawhide
# dnf --enablerepo=rawhide update openstack-packstack
# dnf install python3-pyOpenSSL.noarch python-service-identity.noarch
python-ndg_httpsclient.noarch
**********************
At this point run :-
**********************
# packstack --gen-answer-file answer-file-aio.txt
and set
CONFIG_KEYSTONE_SERVICE_NAME=httpd
I also commented out second line in /etc/httpd/conf.d/mod_dnssd.conf
# cd /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/packstack/puppet/templates
and apply third patc from http://textuploader.com/yn0v
It will disable provision_demo.pp.
Then run
# packstack --answer-file=./answer-file-aio.txt
3:41 p.m.
I also commented out second line in /etc/httpd/conf.d/mod_dnssd.conf
I do not have this file.
I tried using patch but it failed. Looks like my file doesn't have the
ipv6 check so the lines are different. I deleted that whole block
manually. Was that correct?
Then run
# packstack --answer-file=./answer-file-aio.txt
I had to edit
/usr/share/openstack-puppet/modules/apache/templates/httpd.conf.erb and
insert
Include conf.modules.d/*.conf
right after
IncludeOptional "<%= @confd_dir %>/*.conf"
But I still got an error at: neutron.pp
Error: Could not autoload puppet/provider/vs_port/ovs_redhat_el6: Could
not find parent provider ovs_redhat of ovs_redhat_el6
The error file contained:
Error: Could not autoload puppet/provider/vs_port/ovs_redhat_el6: Could
not find parent provider ovs_redhat of ovs_redhat_el6^[[0m
Error: Could not autoload puppet/type/vs_port: Could not autoload
puppet/provider/vs_port/ovs_redhat_el6: Could not find parent provider
ovs_redhat of ovs_redhat_el6^[[0m
Error: Evaluation Error: Error while evaluating a Virtual Query, Could not
autoload puppet/type/vs_port: Could not autoload
puppet/provider/vs_port/ovs_redhat_el6: Could not find parent provider
ovs_redhat of ovs_redhat_el6 at
/var/tmp/packstack/bc47df3faa1e4c0e9a87dbeb02d13c8e/modules/vswitch/manifests/ovs.pp:84:29
on node
Again, thank you very much for the help!
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
2:29 a.m.
Yes.
Insert this line as first into
ovs_redhat_el6.rbFile.expand_path(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__),
'.','ovs_redhat.rb')
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234042
comment 6
2:37 a.m.
New subject: [Rdo-list] RE(2): Juno on Fedora 22
Sorry for typo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234042
In meantime on any box IP_neutron.pp fails due to failure auto load
parent ovs_redhat, corresponding fix is inserting as first line:-
require File.expand_path(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__),
'.','ovs_redhat.rb')
into ovs_redhat_el6.rb>
5:10 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
I don't think RDO Juno was ever tested (or intended to be used) on Fedora 22. There
are not even repositories for it:
https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-juno/
I would focus the efforts on RDO Kilo (which could have still some troubles on Fedora 22,
but at least it meant to be working there), or switch back to Fedora 21, or use CentOS 7
which has a less changing base environments.
Ciao
--
Luigi
3545
days inactive
3546
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Boris Derzhavets -
Luigi Toscano -
Will Yonker