For the app-catalog-ui package in Mitaka, we made no changes since Liberty in the plugin. We've been working on refactoring a lot of plumbing and wanted it to land in early Newton rather then late in Mitaka. Do you want us to tag a Mitaka stable so you can build it, or just use the liberty tag? Thanks, Kevin ________________________________________ From: rdo-list-bounces(a)redhat.com [rdo-list-bounces(a)redhat.com] on behalf of Haïkel [hguemar(a)fedoraproject.org] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 7:38 AM To: rdo-list(a)redhat.com Subject: [Rdo-list] Mitaka RC1 current status Hi, just to share with you the current status of Mitaka RC1 rebuilds http://paste.fedoraproject.org/344632/45883006/ The bulk of it has been rebuilt using an automation script done by flepied (thanks to him for that!) Remaining packages are ones without stable/mitaka branches, or tarballs, and one FTBFS (cloudkitty) I'll be focusing now on packstack and tripleO in order that we can test the current set of stable builds Regards, H. _______________________________________________ Rdo-list mailing list Rdo-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com

Ok. If you can just keep targeting stable/liberty that would be easiest on our side. It works fine against a Mitaka Horizon. Thanks, Kevin ________________________________________ From: karlthered(a)gmail.com [karlthered(a)gmail.com] on behalf of Haïkel [hguemar(a)fedoraproject.org] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 4:06 PM To: Fox, Kevin M Cc: rdo-list(a)redhat.com Subject: Re: [Rdo-list] Mitaka RC1 current status 2016-03-24 16:37 GMT+01:00 Fox, Kevin M <Kevin.Fox(a)pnnl.gov&gt;: Just let me know which tag you want me to ship in RDO Mitaka. I'd prefer having stable branches so that we could automate builds, but that could happen after your big refactoring. Regards, H.