De: "Martin Mágr" <mmagr(a)redhat.com&gt; Para: "David Moreau Simard" <dms(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Javier Pena" <jpena(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Ivan Chavero" <ichavero(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Alan Pevec" <alan.pevec(a)redhat.com&gt;, &quot;Rdo-list(a)redhat.com&quot; <rdo-list(a)redhat.com&gt; Enviados: Viernes, 18 de Marzo 2016 9:26:16 Asunto: Re: Packstack tagging CC'ing rdo-list On 03/18/2016 04:23 PM, Martin Mágr wrote: > Greetings guys, > > I think that it's time to finally start tagging packstack upstream > releases as David now needs that. This task has been in TODO list for > several releases already and was always thrown away from radar with > low priority.

> I'd like us to agree on a tagging workflow. David suggested first > tag "<dmsimard> I wanted to tag 8.0.0b1", so IIUC to follow OpenStack > upstream milestones (eg. Mitaka beta1 -> 8.0.0b1 ?). Has anybody > something against that scheme?

> What should be the first tag in stable/liberty?

Martin Mágr <mmagr(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: CC'ing rdo-list > > On 03/18/2016 04:23 PM, Martin Mágr wrote: > >> Greetings guys, >> >> I think that it's time to finally start tagging packstack upstream >> releases as David now needs that. This task has been in TODO list for >> several releases already and was always thrown away from radar with low >> priority. >> >> I'd like us to agree on a tagging workflow. David suggested first tag >> "<dmsimard> I wanted to tag 8.0.0b1", so IIUC to follow OpenStack upstream >> milestones (eg. Mitaka beta1 -> 8.0.0b1 ?). Has anybody something against >> that scheme? >> > Any reason why you start from 8, not 1 [which would indicate it’s the first packstack release]? Ihar