Great!
I'm currently working on how to bring log- and application-
performance monitoring under the same roof for cloud-native and highly
distributed applications on top of OpenStack w/ Cloud Foundry or
OpenShift and Kubernetes add-ons and define some best practices
(needs) to build a simple, though effective cloud native application
monitoring solution for BizDevOps (yet another buzz :-)).
My 10 BizDevOps needs are:
1. Bring log and performance monitoring under the same roof, by
providing a seamless correlation between log and performance metrics.
2. Provide intuitive pre-built monitoring interfaces and dashboards
for everybody and for different roles and organizations
(BizDevOps) (note: people lack the time and sometimes the skills
to configure a monitoring tool).
3. Build dedicated dashboards for transaction and correlation
analysis to figure out the usual suspects like, memory leaks,
garbage collection, saturated thread pools and hundreds of unusual
suspects which might be the root cause of problems.
4. Enhance the quality of logs (on paas and apps level) and define
custom metrics which are specific to our cloud-native applications
and visualize these metrics on custom dashboards for tenants w/
different roles.
5. Analyze long term-trends such as how big is my database and how
fast is it growing? How quickly is my daily-active user count growing?
6. Implement innovative ideas such as data mining, forecasting and
advanced analytics support to provide added value to the
monitoring solution.
7. Get alerts on issues before customers notice, use the monitoring
tool as an early warning system, and analyze application
performance before and after new code deployments.
8. If using remediation actions which are triggered through the
monitoring solution, first require human approval before the
script is executed (this provides a better understanding of the
root cause of the problem and how to eliminate it in long term).
9. Implement a simple, though an effective alerting system with clear
alerting escalation path and low noise (rules that generate alerts
for developers or operators should be simple to understand and
represent a clear failure).
10. Combine heavy use of white-box monitoring with modest but critical
uses of black-box monitoring and learn from others like Google
about how they are monitoring their highly distributed systems:
https://www.oreilly.com/ideas/monitoring-distributed-systems
To achieve the above needs, I'm investigating the following tools
to
bring log and performance monitoring under the same roof for my
current needs:
* ELK / EFK Stack
* Hawkular:
http://www.hawkular.org/
EFK is already being used by OpenShift and RDO, and Hawkular is already
being used by OpenShift - these will be among our first packages to support.
* Stagemonitor
http://www.stagemonitor.org/
* cAdvisor
https://github.com/google/cadvisor
and I think these BizDevOps-Tools might be the right choice to start
with and I'd be happy to be of help.
Cheers,
Arash
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Matthias Runge <mrunge(a)redhat.com
<mailto:mrunge@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 20/05/16 16:12, Rich Megginson wrote:
> We are trying to start up a CentOS OpsTools SIG
>
https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup for logging,
monitoring, etc.
>
> The intention is that this would be the upstream for development and
> packaging of tools related to logging (EFK stack, etc.),
monitoring, and
> other opstools, as a single place where packages can be consumed
by RDO,
> OpenShift Origin, and other upstream projects - pool our resources,
> share the lessons learned, and enable cross project log
aggregation and
> correlation (e.g. running OpenShift on top of OpenStack on top of
> Ceph/Gluster - do my OpenShift application errors correlate with
Nova
> errors? file system errors?). This would also be a place for
> installers (puppet manifests, ansible playbooks), and possibly
> testing/CI and containers.
>
> If you are interested, please chime in in the email thread:
>
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2016-May/014777.html
>
Thank you for the reminder, Rich.
We already have quite a few interested persons. The reason, why I
didn't
mention this here was, that it has a broader focus than just RDO.
On the other side, it clearly will be usable with RDO, and it will
help
RDO operators to get to the root of occurring issues.
If any of you is interested or can help, please join us on
centos-devel
mailing list and express your interest there. It will help us to speed
things up.
--
Matthias Runge <mrunge(a)redhat.com <mailto:mrunge@redhat.com>>
Red Hat GmbH,
http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Paul Argiry, Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham,
Michael O'Neill
_______________________________________________
rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list(a)redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list@redhat.com>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
<mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com