Re: [Rdo-list] rdopkg overview

On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 14:52 +0100, Jakub Ruzicka wrote: > For some time, I'm wondering if we should really call it rdopkg CI since > it's not really tied to rdopkg but to RDO. You can use most of rdopkg on > any distgit. I reckon we should simply call it RDO CI to avoid > confusion. I for one don't underestimate the impact of naming stuff ;)

So I suppose Phase 1 would be a reduced to a basic packstack job that runs through w/ the update from the devels submission. Phase 2 addressed what happens when a group of submissions are pooled together. Does one submission break another submission that could not have been detected in the individual submissions themselves. I see two options here.. A. Let the issue get sorted out in the stage yum repo. B. Create a temporary yum repo with collection of submissions with a job hitting rdo production and the temporary repo.