9:24 a.m.
Hello together,
I'm proceeding with this installation and I'm facing a strange problem with
openvswitch on the controller node which has been reported here too:
https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/10228/neutron-ovs-error-on-controller/
If I do a ovs-vsctl show, I'm getting:
[root@controller ~]# ovs-vsctl show
2014-03-16T04:40:26Z|00001|reconnect|WARN|unix:/var/run/openvswitch/db.sock:
connection attempt failed (No such file or directory)
ovs-vsctl: unix:/var/run/openvswitch/db.sock: database connection failed
(No such file or directory)
And in /var/log/neutron/openvswitch-agent.log I can see:
2014-03-15 23:22:37.296 3084 INFO neutron.common.config [-] Logging enabled!
2014-03-15 23:22:37.296 3084 ERROR
neutron.plugins.openvswitch.agent.ovs_neutron_agent [-] Tunneling cannot be
enabled without a valid local_ip. Agent terminated!
It seems that on the controller the ovs neutron agent doesn't like my
"local_ip".
But on the compute and network node ovs-vsctl show works:
[root@neutron ~]# ovs-vsctl show
6093f101-4bac-4e30-afc6-545f8f3dc6a1
Bridge br-int
Port br-int
Interface br-int
type: internal
Bridge br-tun
Port br-tun
Interface br-tun
type: internal
ovs_version: "1.11.0"
And here is my ifconfig on the controller node:
[root@controller ~]# ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FA:16:3E:80:BC:FB
inet addr:10.0.0.6 Bcast:10.0.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::f816:3eff:fe80:bcfb/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:6523 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:4982 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:1317111 (1.2 MiB) TX bytes:849191 (829.2 KiB)
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FA:16:3E:0B:AF:9A
inet addr:10.0.1.5 Bcast:10.0.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::f816:3eff:fe0b:af9a/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:9 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:336 (336.0 b) TX bytes:546 (546.0 b)
eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FA:16:3E:45:8E:FD
inet addr:10.0.2.5 Bcast:10.0.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::f816:3eff:fe45:8efd/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:9 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:336 (336.0 b) TX bytes:566 (566.0 b)
Any ideas?
Thanks!
Arash
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Arash Kaffamanesh
Like <https://www.facebook.com/cloudssky> |
Follow<https://twitter.com/CLOUDSSKYONE>
| Build your CloudSite with OpenCms OCCX on
ProfitBricks<http://cloudssky.com/en/cloud_services/cloudsite.html>
*________________**____________*
*Arash Kaffamanesh*
*Clouds Sky GmbH*
*Im Mediapark 4C*
*50760 Köln*
T.: +49 221 379 90 680
M.: +49 177 880 77 34
www.cloudssky.com
*_________________**___________*
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Hugh O. Brock <hbrock(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 09:53:35AM +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 08:46:45PM +0100, Arash Kaffamanesh wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I posted a question regarding "Deploying RDO using Foreman" to
> > ask.openstack.org and thanks to Keshyap and Rich which engaged me to
> > proceed further, I updated the thread here:
> >
> >
https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/12104/deploying-rdo-using-foreman/
> >
> > The post might be too long, here some more information about the reason
> > behind my question and some more questions:
> >
> > I'm trying to learn Foreman for installing OpenStack and use it to
deploy
> > RDO on top of RDO to provide some kind of OpenStack training /
webinars and
> > later to run the whole thing on 6-8 bare metal machines and use it to
> > deploy OpenShift and write a tutorial about the whole thing and post
it on
> > the RDO site, LinkedIn, etc.
> >
> > About our BASE RDO environment:
> > Our RDO based 3 node environment is thanks to the latest update very
stable
> > and very fast now and I've to thank all of you smart guys for doing
such a
> > great work!
> >
> > Our environment uses VLAN and the Foreman RDO installation shall use
GRE
> > and Qemu (or LXC / Docker) to let us play with the whole thing and
write a
> > tutorial about the whole thing.
> >
> > So my questions:
> > Does the Foreman installation on top of a virtualized environment work
at
> > all? (I guess yes)
>
> Yes, technically, it should work. Refer to my previous email on
> this list[1] for some URLs on Foreman.
>
> > Could a VLAN based BASE-Install be a problem to succeed with this
scenario
> > (to have GRE on top of VLAN)? (I guess no)
>
> Only way to know with certainity - to try it.
>
> > Has someone tried such a scenario before? (I guess yes)
> > Could I use LXC / Docker instead Qemu?
>
> There's active work on upstream for Docker support, so you ought to
> experiment and carefully note down observations, filing bugs along the
> way.
>
> And, it depends on _what_ you want to do with the LXC/Docker setup. If
> it's just to try it out, there's decent resources on the inter-webs.
>
Hi there. It's also worth mentioning that we are actively working on
improving the OpenStack installation process with Foreman, including
adding a better UI and some workflow components to stage
deployments. Watch this list for details as they emerge.
--Hugh
--
== Hugh Brock, hbrock(a)redhat.com ==
== Senior Engineering Manager, Cloud Engineering ==
== Tuskar: Elastic Scaling for OpenStack ==
== http://github.com/tuskar ==
"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I’m
not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant."
--Robert McCloskey