Re: [rdo-list] Trunk and continuous integration: can we use qemu-kvm from buildlogs ("-testing") ?

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 5:44 PM, David Moreau Simard <dms(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Hi, > > Right now, delorean-deps.repo [1] provides the "stable" > repository/release of qemu-kvm [2]. > > Going back, we can't really find if it was a conscious decision to use > the stable release than the one from "-testing". > I'm convinced it'd make sense to switch delorean-deps.repo to use > buildlogs (so qemu-kvm tagged "testing") in the context where we are > testing things. > You mean changing delorean-deps.repo in trunk.rdoproject.org?, that will impact all jobs using rdo trunk repos > This way, we could potentially catch issues before they land in the > stable repositories. > If there's no objections, we could do this early next week. > > What do you think ? > I don't think having two moving targets in the same set of tests, a problem in qemu-kvm will block all pipelines.

If we want to test kvm in testing releases (what i agree), i think the best way is to create a new pipeline testing master/current-passed-ci + kvm testing repos, not using testing repo in all jobs. Anyway, given the rest of responses, it seems i'm alone on this... :) > Thanks, > > [1]: https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-master/delorean-deps.repo > [2]: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt/$basearch/kvm-common/ > > David Moreau Simard > Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO > > dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter] > > _______________________________________________ > rdo-list mailing list > rdo-list(a)redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list > > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com _______________________________________________ rdo-list mailing list rdo-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com