Andrew,
See a few comments inline below, but first thanks for giving the foreman
installer a shot. It looks like you have had a good amount of success
and made some good discoveries along the way!
I really appreciate the fact that you have gotten so far & the feedback
on areas where you are running into issues.
Thanks,
Mike
On 03/16/2014 08:02 AM, Andrew Lau wrote:
Hi all,
So far, I've been successful with the following setup on havana, but
icehouse had issue as below:
1x Controller
2x Compute + Network + Gluster
I forked the astapor repo so I can run the compute + networker in the
same module, along with a few other tweaks. [1]
Nice -- this is one variation that a lot of people seem interested in.
We'd probably have to give some thought on how to fold things together
but I bet it would be a good candidate for further discussion and
potential inclusion at some point in the future.
So far everything is working, I plan on uploading my notes in a few
days
but I've run into a few issues which I'm hoping someone could help:
- When using the icehouse repo, the controller hostgroup will install
but httpd will fail with 'no listening sockets available, shutting down,
Unable to open logs'. There were no selinux denies, or anything else in
the log files.
- >From a brief look at the manifest and trial and error, it looks like
the ml2 plugin does have some support in the quickstack files. It
however fails at the neutron-db-manage. Manual steps: [2]
Error Output: [3]
The team has been working to track down the remaining issues in
neutron-db-manage. John Eckersberg (added to the message to make sure
he sees this) is eck or jeckersb on irc and is likely a good person to
coordinate with in terms of the foreman side of the equation. He has
been working with some neutron folks to try to run this down.
I'm aware there's a few new projects going on to bridge the foreman and
rdo integration, I like the current foreman setup because it's very
customizable, but the key flaws are too many options. ie. if I'm using
VLANs, I don't want to see tunnel options etc.
Yes! A lot of the present work can be broken down into 2 bits. The
quickstack work proper to make several reasonably easy to deploy cloud
examples + a good amount of usability work that is presently just
getting started to help weave things together a lot more elegantly for
end-user consumption. A lot of the "I'm using VLAN please don't bother
showing me params that apply only to tunnel solutions" falls into that
latter set of work.