Re: [Rdo-list] Packaging the big tent (or at least part of it)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 05/27/2015 09:22 PM, Haïkel wrote:
2015-05-27 17:18 GMT+02:00 Lars Kellogg-Stedman
<lars(a)redhat.com>:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 08:42:29PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>> officially identify what's in RDO (to avoid duplicates) and
>>> give people a way of identifying who's responsible if
>>> patches/work is needed (and who to contact to offer help
>>> assisting maintenance).
>>
>> Possibly this is too heavyweight, but it may be that pkdb2
>> <https://github.com/fedora-infra/pkgdb2> could be of help
>> here.
>
> +1, I was just going to write and say that (a) yes, absolutely,
> we need that and (b) isn't there any way we can take advantage of
> the existing Fedora infrastructure, which does just about all of
> this already? :)
>
We actually do, RDO sources are hosted in Fedora dist-git so we
already leverage that infrastructure but that wouldn't extend to
CentOS CBS Koji instance.
Don't we plan to drop Fedora dist-git? My understanding from RDO
meetup at the summit is that that's the plan, unless someone has clear
objections (like Fedora Infra relying on packages to run their
infrastructure; though in that case we would already have a problem,
since we dropped non-rawhide branches anyway).
Also, we have packages that are not in Fedora (openstack-designate,
openstack-neutron-*aas, python-networking-*).
Ihar
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVZt7eAAoJEC5aWaUY1u57tGUH/1kMsJ3CqU16A4D9lOyjgEtk
memJXGdHp3etV2aQOXZB9k+7aAn8mGRSj3nHZJzOdLJFhkMvO4vWpzG2FOgyP3hP
XmhPkUwSVwJP2eNFJ8mU3wWzksnL/DOlbTbwkCxrP2eQMkK7Z7RuYypfZq/ks1/5
nz0DC29saEvUwy2hlo6kbTUOIvCSkjuUkCjqDJZYVANU4mYYY6Is+5Cz8V4bN1NR
ofdhOSCv8p6gjVJgLM3cULwRyCEhzBMp136wXyLvqZQa2/sSZOIL2JVo8GRkX63i
Zbv/8yMR2N+FkeMBzXsO63q+CS9LFZ7bJ42Es7Qam1FWTR4JNjl7nLyhOcoCkP8=
=805t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----