Re: [Rdo-list] Packstack Icehouse changes

On 26.6.2014 15:33, Perry Myers wrote: > On 06/26/2014 09:23 AM, Shake Chen wrote: >> remove the feature the packstack have been own is not good idea, and >> would affect many user. > > Part of the reason for the reduction in scope of Packstack is due to > resource constraints for the team that is working on Packstack, Puppet > and Foreman. > > If we could get some folks outside of Red Hat to become upstream > contributors and more importantly maintainers of Packstack, then that > would alleviate some of the scope creep concerns and perhaps Packstack > could be expanded a bit. > > But right now with the majority of the effort solely coming from a > handful of Red Hatters, we just don't have the bandwidth and hence the > scope of Packstack was reduced to be purely an all-in-one/demo tool. Well, it was created as a proof-of-concept/demo tool in the first place. If you want sophisticated multi-node installer, packstack isn't the right tool for that job.

Cheers Jakub _______________________________________________ Rdo-list mailing list Rdo-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list