Removed internal list from CC.
On 11/07/2015 12:35 PM, Arie Bregman wrote:
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 12:07 AM, David Moreau Simard
<dms(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Can we extend this to rdo-list ? Sounds relevant to the community.
>
Sure, good idea. Adding rdo-list.
>
> David Moreau Simard
> Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO
>
> dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayutin(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>> Arie,
>> This looks good.
>> Who is going to maintain the delorean ci job?
>
Who maintains it today? we'll have to discuss it. It might be good idea to
add 'job owner/maintainer' info as we have in rhos CI.
> Have you reached out to Derek Higgins about writing a replacement for the
>> current delorean ci?
>
No. The work on this has just begun. Adding Derek to this mail.
>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Steve Linabery <slinaber(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:49:05PM +0200, Arie Bregman wrote:
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Not sure if you all familiar with Delorean project[1]. Quick
>>>> introduction
>>>> (CI related) for those who are not:
>>>>
>>>> Delorean is an upstream project that builds and maintains yum
>>>> repositories.
>>>> It builds repository every time patch submitted to one of the upstream
>>>> openstack-packages projects.
>>>> The delorean job is located here:
>>>>
https://prod-rdojenkins.rhcloud.com/job/delorean-ci
>>>>
>>>> How the job works at the moment:
>>>> It runs delorean directly on the slave and if the build process
>>>> succeeded,
>>>> it votes with +1
>>>>
>>>> What I suggest:
>>>> - Move delorean installation and run to khaleesi by creating
> 'delorean'
>>>> role
>>>> - Extend the job to run tests using the rpms delorean built
>>>>
>>>> Why:
>>>> - Main reason: It's important for developers to get immediate
feedback
>>>> on
>>>> whether the new packages are good or not. simply run delorean and see
My main contention is that this actually would lower the "immediateness"
of the feedback. The fastest rdo-manager job we have using tempest smoke
is the non-ha job, and it currently takes 90 minutes. So instead of a
6min job to check the general sanity of the package we would have a
90min job running against every packaging change.
I am not really convinced that packaging changes break us often enough
to warrant that. Maybe that happens more on the core service side than
on the RDO-Manager side, but on the RDO-Manager side I do not think I
have seen a bad package change break everything in the year I have been
working on it. (and there have been plenty of total breakages in that
time to constitute a decent sample size)
> if
>>>> build is ok, is not enough. We need to extend the current job.
>>>>
>>>> - Users can use khaleesi to test specs they wrote. This is actually
>>>> pretty
>>>> amazing. users write specs and run khaleesi. khaleesi then handles
>>>> everything - it building the rpms using delorean and run the tests.
>>>>
I am not opposed to adding this functionality to khaleesi, as it seems
generally useful from a developer perspective. I am opposed to using it
to gate packaging changes, unless there is some evidence that we are
breaking everything with our packaging changes often enough to warrant a
15x or higher increase in the gate job.
>>>> - We can use delorean to replace our current way to
build rpms and
>>>> creating
>>>> repos. delorean doing it in a smart way, using docker and by that it
>>>> creates rpms for several distributions in isolated environment.
>>>
>>> Delorean no longer uses docker.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
https://github.com/openstack-packages/delorean/commit/66571fce45a007bcf49...
>
Interesting. any idea why this change? adding Alan.
We essentially rewrote mock in a docker container. Just using mock made
more sense from a maintainability standpoint.
>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> - Khaleesi awesomeness will increase
>>>>
>>>> There is also no need to add/maintain settings in khaleesi for that.
>>>> delorean properties (version, url, etc) will be provided by extra-vars
>>>> (unless you are in favor of maintaining general settings for delorean
> in
>>>> khaleesi)
>>>>
>>>> The new job work flow:
>>>> 1. Run delorean on slave and save rpms from delorean build process.
>>>> 2. Run provision playbook
>>>> 3. Copy delorean rpms to provisioned nodes and create repo for them on
>>>> each
>>>> node
>>>> 4. run installer playbooks (installer will use delorean rpms)
>>>> 5. Run Tests =D
>>>> 6. Vote +1/-1 according to build process + tests.
>>>>
>>>> step 3 can be replaced. Since delorean creates repository, we can
> simply
>>>> reference each node to the new repository on the slave.
>>>>
>>>> Would love to hear your opinion on that.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Arie
>>>>
>>>> P.S
>>>> started to work on that:
https://review.gerrithub.io/#/c/251464
>>>>
>>>> [1]
https://github.com/openstack-packages/delorean
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Rdo-list mailing list
Rdo-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com