Regards,
---
JuanFra Rodriguez Cardoso
2014-09-11 3:21 GMT+02:00 Elías David <elias.moreno.tec(a)gmail.com>:
Hello,
I'm seeing a constant behaviour with my implementation of openstack
(libvirt/kvm) and cinder using glusterfs and I'm having troubles to find
the real cause or if it's something not normal at all.
I have configured cinder to use glusterfs as storage backend, the volume
is a replica 2 of 8 disks in 2 servers and I have several volumes attached
to several instances provided by cinder. The problem is this, is not
uncommon that one of the gluster servers reboot suddenly due to power
failures (this is an infrastructure problem unavoidable right now), when
this happens the instances start to see the attached volume as read only
which force me to hard reboot the instance so it can access the volume
normally again.
Here are my doubts, the gluster volume is created in such a way that not a
single replica is on the same server as the master, if I lose a server due
to hardware failure, the other is still usable so I don't really understand
why couldn't the instances just use the replica brick in case that one of
the servers reboots.
Also, why the data is still there, can be read but can't be written to in
case of glusterfs failures? Is this a problem with my implementation?
configuration error on my part? something known to openstack? a cinder
thing? libvirt? glusterfs?
Having to hard reboot the instances is not a big issue right now, but
nevertheless I want to understand what's happening and if I can avoid this
issue.
Some specifics:
GlusterFS version is 3.5 All systems are CentOS 6.5 Openstack version is
Icehouse installed with packstack/rdo
Thanks in advance!
--
Elías David.
_______________________________________________
Rdo-list mailing list
Rdo-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list