Re: [Rdo-list] [TripleO] Should we rename "RDO Manager" to "TripleO" ?
+∞, as this was confusing to me as well. It's also not clear where upstream and
downstream intermingle to me. Is downstream from TripleO or from RDO-m? (Questions are not
intended to be answered :))
I think a clear 1:1 mapping between the upstream and downstream projects is the best way
forward, and significantly less confusing for everyone involved. Ideally it'll result
in more integration with upstream on the CI side as well, especially if some sort of
third-party CI deployment can be done.
Thanks,
Leif.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Moreau Simard" <dms(a)redhat.com>
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev(a)lists.openstack.org>, "rdo-list"
<rdo-list(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 17 February, 2016 11:27:22 AM
Subject: [Rdo-list] [TripleO] Should we rename "RDO Manager" to
"TripleO" ?
With this in mind, we would like to drop the RDO manager branding and
use TripleO instead.
<snip>
--
Leif Madsen
NFV Partner Engineering - NFV & CI
Red Hat | Toronto, Canada