Re: [rdo-list] ceph-ansible auto builds in cbs.centos.org
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Ken Dreyer <kdreyer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi folks,
TL;DR new ceph-ansible tags are automatically built in the CentOS Storage SIG.
The RDO team members have been building ceph-related RPMs in the
CentOS Storage SIG, including ceph-ansible. Specifically this has been
handled by Giulio Fidente and John Fulton on the OpenStack (RDO/OSP)
team.
The reason is that TripleO relies on ceph-ansible to install Ceph, and
TripleO expects to install a ceph-ansible RPM. So RDO depends on the
ceph-ansible CBS builds.
In the past Giulio had been doing these CentOS builds by hand,
rebuilding upstream SRPMs from shaman.ceph.com, for example
http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=19762
I have a job running in an internal Jenkins instance that now polls
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible every hour and builds any new Git
tags within CBS. An example is
http://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=227958 , although that was
"scratch = True", and future builds will not be scratch builds. It is
using the script at https://github.com/ktdreyer/ceph-ansible-cbs
Thanks for working on this Ken.
For which repos are you doing this? I.e. what subset of the following
is this now the case for?
echo ceph-{jewel,luminous}-{release,testing,candidate}
TripleO CI uses ceph-ansible from centos-jewel (release) for the
voting job scenario001-multinode-oooq-container, so I'd rather we
didn't promote from testing to release until we know that
scenario001-multinode-oooq-container is passing with the new
ceph-ansible (otherwise we could break TripleO CI).
One way to test this is to have a submission which varies the line
below to use not ceph-jewel but ceph-jewel-testing (though there is no
mirror).
https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/blob/5389b4c44b1e2c1dc308...
John
Next steps:
- automatically tag new builds into storage7-ceph-luminous-testing
- automatically tag new builds into storage7-ceph-luminous-release
Anyone in RDO have suggestions for how we should gate these next CBS
tagging operations? My simple approach was going to be "tag into
-testing immediately, then wait two weeks and tag into -release". If
there is a simple way to have safer, automatic gating here, I'm open
to that.
- Ken
_______________________________________________
rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com