Re: [rdo-list] Packstack refactor and future ideas
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Alan Pevec <apevec(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I understand this, my concern is that if we remove this feature
we will leave
> users with no tool for doing multinode in a lightweight way and this might
> drive off users from testing/adopting RDO.
We would provide equivalent tool based on singlenode Packstack, with a
clear unsupported message.
That's really the only honest and responsible thing we can do, given
resources available.
Given that:
- Users require multihost for PoCs
- We can't test multihost in CI
What is the difference between creating a new "unsupported" additional
tool and marking multihost capabilities in packstack as
"unsuported/untested"?.
Current code enabling multihost in packstack is working and i have
doubts about the expected wins in time supporting multihost in
packstack versus creating a new ansible tooling and modifying
packstack to work fine in this new "externally orchestrated mode".
> I'm willing to create CI tests for multinode Packstack in
order to maintain
> this features.
It's not just tests, it's multinode CI infra that is hard.
Cheers,
Alan
_______________________________________________
rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com