On 05/28/2015 06:58 AM, Alan Pevec wrote:
> Don't we plan to drop Fedora dist-git? My understanding from
RDO
> meetup at the summit is that that's the plan, unless someone has clear
I was not at meetup but that's not my conclusion from the notes in
etherpad
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO_Vancouver
Rich, do you have an usable voice recording of the meetup or more
detailed notes?
I have the recording, but I haven't had an opportunity to edit it yet.
It's on my list for today.
--Rich
Before the meetup I did add few lines at the bottom of == Packaging ==
section regarding RDO==Delorean, but I didn't see any comments.
We cannot say RDO==Delorean and github/openstack-packages rpm-<branch>
are not enough to be used as dist-git.
> objections (like Fedora Infra relying on packages to run their
> infrastructure; though in that case we would already have a problem,
> since we dropped non-rawhide branches anyway).
We did not drop anything, yet, until we have alternative home for dist-git.
> Also, we have packages that are not in Fedora (openstack-designate,
> openstack-neutron-*aas, python-networking-*).
Until we have dist-git ready in
git.centos.org please do open Fedora
review requests so we can have dist-git for them.
Cheers,
Alan
--
Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com
OpenStack Community Liaison
http://rdoproject.org/