Re: [rdo-dev] HAProxy 2.2 in RDO repositories

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020, 16:19 Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <amoralej(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 11:14 AM Alfredo Moralejo Alonso < > amoralej(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 2:52 PM Carlos Goncalves <cgoncalves(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 1:58 PM Alan Pevec <apevec(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Carlos, >>>> >>>> > Octavia roadmap includes adding support to new features and >>>> performance improvements only available starting in HAProxy 2.0. CentOS 8 >>>> ships with HAProxy 1.8, and according to the package maintainer there are >>>> no plans to provide HAProxy 2.x in a foreseeable future. >>>> > I have rebuilt HAProxy 2.2 from Fedora rawhide against CentOS 8 and >>>> CentOS Stream in [1] and validated it passed Octavia tests in [2] [3] >>>> (patchset 3, ignore newer ones). >>>> > We would like to check if it would be possible to provide the latest >>>> stable LTS HAProxy 2.2 in RDO repositories. >>>> >>>> Since HAProxy is networking related and could be used outside >>>> OpenStack, I'd like to consider building and hosting it by rebooted >>>> NFV CentOS SIG. >>>> >>> >> I'll bring the topic in next NFV SIG meeting >> >> >>> We should avoid pilling up deps in RDO repos, adding them is the last >>>> option as per our deps guidelines [1] >>>> >>> >>> Works for me. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Can you also give us short intro how is haproxy included and used in >>>> Octavia? >>>> If it were a containerized service, we might be able to take the >>>> container image from Openshift/OKD ? >>>> >>> >>> The HAProxy RPM is installed in the base operating system, >>> a non-containerized environment. The amphora provider, the reference >>> open-source provider, orchestrates the life-cycle of amphorae instances >>> (service VMs) including HAProxy to deliver load balancing services to >>> tenant application environments. >>> >>> >> >> >> haproxy is used out of octavia/amphora to balance across api services, >> iirc, so we should check with other consumers in TripleO. >> > > I've built haproxy-2.2.2 and pushed to > https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/8/nfv/x86_64/network-extras/ for > testing. > Cool, thank you very much! I'm currently on PTO (back on Sept 14). If you or one of my Octavia colleagues want to give that build a spin, feel free to play with https://review.opendev.org/#/c/744102/

From our side, this build looks good and can be release tagged. Thanks!

> First CI jobs show an issue when balancing redis traffic in TripleO > deployment. I've sent a fix for it in: > > https://review.opendev.org/#/c/749525/ > > I'll try to involve maintainers for other impacted services to validate > it. > > >> >> >>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Alan >>>> >>>> [1] https://www.rdoproject.org/documentation/requirements/ >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> dev mailing list >>> dev(a)lists.rdoproject.org >>> http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev >>> >>> To unsubscribe: dev-unsubscribe(a)lists.rdoproject.org >>> >>