Re: [Rdo-list] Current status of RDO Liberty CBS Repos and Bug "neutron-openvswitch-agent is crashing with "invalid literal for int() with base 10" error "

________________________________________ From: Alan Pevec <apevec(a)gmail.com&gt; Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2015 12:11 PM To: Ihar Hrachyshka Cc: Boris Derzhavets; rdo-list Subject: Re: [Rdo-list] Current status of RDO Liberty CBS Repos and Bug "neutron-openvswitch-agent is crashing with "invalid literal for int() with base 10" error " 2015-12-01 14:27 GMT+01:00 Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys(a)redhat.com&gt;: >> Mentioned Bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1494281 contains :- >> Fix merged to neutron (stable/liberty) >> Reviewed: https://review.openstack.org/238485 >> Properly handle segmentation_id in OVS agent > Yes, RDO Liberty is affected (Delorean Liberty is not). > > Please RDO folks advice: should we backport the patch or wait till rebase? "RDO folks" is all of us :) General rule for RDO builds is stick to vanilla upstream sources unless issue is a total blocker bug, high security fix or solving packaging problem. So question is for openstack-neutron maintainers: - ihrachys(a)redhat.com - majopela(a)redhat.com how to rate this issue. But AFAICT Neutron 7.0.1 should be out any day now[1] so I'd suggest pushing that release upstream then rebase in RDO Liberty. Sorry for stupid question, if 7.0.1 will be pushed to RDO Liberty then commit https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/neutron/commit/?id=f63366e615e2d... would be just in tar ball. Does it mean then in properly configured environment following command would work (as admin ) # neutron router-create --ha True --distributed True --tenant_id demo_id RouterSuper or it becomes possible only in final Mitaka Release.

What means last statement in https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1365473 Armando Migliaccio (armando-migliaccio) on 2015-11-11 Changed in neutron: importance: High → Wishlist