May 2018 - dev - Rdo List Archives

by Neal Gompa

Hey all, It's been several years since OpenStack has been part of the Fedora distribution. Since then, a number of things have changed. Some of the major ones: * Python packaging has gotten better and easier in Fedora (the changes are numerous) * RDO now has Software Factory and full-range CI capabilities * Fedora has CI hook support for packaging (with the transition to Pagure dist-git) * OpenStack and Fedora schedules line up again: https://releases.openstack.org/ In my view, it's a huge shame that we don't offer OpenStack for people to use on Fedora, integrated with the latest software. OpenStack distribution on other distros are able to pull this off, and I feel like we should be able to as well. So what I want to know is the following: * What are the (real or perceived) difficulties in packaging OpenStack for Fedora? * How difficult would it be to adapt RDO CI tooling to plug into Fedora Dist-Git? * How many of the underlying dependencies exist in Fedora today that were forked into CentOS for RDO and which ones? * What dependencies are in RDO that don't exist in Fedora? I'm willing to help with a lot of the packaging stuff, including adapting packages for Fedora, and helping with reviews to bring stuff back in. I firmly believe that maintenance of OpenStack in Fedora should be far easier than it was three years ago, when it was ripped out. So help me... Help you! Best regards, Neal -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!

6 years, 4 months

3
2
0 / 0

Re: [rdo-dev] Strategy on packaging external dependencies in RDO + include Ansible in RDO

by Alan Pevec

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 4:31 AM, Sam Doran <sdoran(a)redhat.com> wrote: >> Ansible RPMs are already there >> http://releases.ansible.com/ansible/rpm/release/epel-7-x86_64/ but they >> depend on EPEL for additional deps. > > Ansible RPMs have always been there. I don't believe they depend on anything > in EPEL. You are correct, I had some stale info or mixed it up with something else. Here is yum install output on an empty CentOS7 machine: Installing: ansible noarch 2.4.3.0-1.el7.ans /ansible-2.4.3.0-1.el7.ans.noarch Installing for dependencies: PyYAML x86_64 3.10-11.el7 base libyaml x86_64 0.1.4-11.el7_0 base python-babel noarch 0.9.6-8.el7 base python-cffi x86_64 1.6.0-5.el7 base python-enum34 noarch 1.0.4-1.el7 base python-idna noarch 2.4-1.el7 base python-ipaddress noarch 1.0.16-2.el7 base python-jinja2 noarch 2.7.2-2.el7 base python-markupsafe x86_64 0.11-10.el7 base python-paramiko noarch 2.1.1-4.el7 extras python-ply noarch 3.4-11.el7 base python-pycparser noarch 2.14-1.el7 base python-setuptools noarch 0.9.8-7.el7 base python2-cryptography x86_64 1.7.2-1.el7_4.1 updates python2-pyasn1 noarch 0.1.9-7.el7 base sshpass x86_64 1.06-2.el7 extras > sshpass and paramiko come from Extras, python2-cryptography comes from > updates. My concern is that if those were included in Extras for Ansible, they would be removed from Extras together with ansible. > I'm not sure if any of that is helpful since you mentioned it would need to > be built by the appropriate SIG anyway. Yes, ideally we would be able to get ConfigMgmt SIG going, in the meantime other SIGs are rebuilding on their own e.g. Virt SIG/oVirt did 2.4.3 http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21591 As a quickfix, we could also temporarily push this to RDO deps repo, until we have rest of the plan ready. >> BTW ideal approach would be to insert OpenStack use-cases into Ansible >> upstream CI and make it voting, this could become reality with cross-project >> CI efforts lead by openstack-infra. With that, Ansible master would never >> break us! > > I don't entirely follow this, but I think it sounds like what I proposed > above: having OpenStack test the devel branch of Ansible so Ansible > Engineering can get feedback quickly if things are broken prior to a > release. I know some of the OpenStack infra folks, and the networking team > within Ansible has been doing a lot of work with them with Zuul for > distributed CI. Myself and Ricardo Cruz on the Ansible side are very > interested in hooking up more testing of Ansible as it relates to OpenStack > using Zuul run by OpenStack Infra. Ricki and I talked about this a bunch at > the PTG but have been working on other things since we got back. Yes, above was forward-looking CD world where, given infinite CI resources, everything is tested pre-commit across collaborating projects. Definitely trunk RPMs from devel branch are the step in that direction, progression scale is: no testing, push the latest release, hope for the best -> CI with latest release -> CI with devel branch -> CI pre-commit Cheers, Alan

6 years, 4 months

3
2
0 / 0

[altarch] Problematic QEMU repo URL in delorean-deps

by Michael Turek

Hey all, We started hitting some new issues on our internal weirdo packstack jobs. Not entirely sure what changed to start it acting up but traced it to the delorean deps repo [0] The repo URL used is http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt/$basearch/kvm-common/ which does not expand to the correct repo on altarch. The kvm common repos are here [1] for those. For now, we'll just manually add the repo to our image. However, is there anything we can do to fix this once we start spinning up the jobs upstream? Thanks, Mike Turek <mjturek on freenode> [0] https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-master/delorean-deps.repo [1] http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/virt/

6 years, 6 months

3
3
0 / 0

EPEL packages needed by OpenStack-Ansible

by David Moreau Simard

Hi, openstack-ansible is working on adding full support for RDO [1]. They currently need EPEL for a few dependencies which aren't currently in the RDO mirrors. Unsurprisingly, things end up conflicting at one point or another because of EPEL being enabled. At first glance, the following packages are the only ones needed: - apt-cacher-ng-3-1.el7: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=915750 - aria2-1.18.10-2.el7.1: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=642076 - lsyncd-2.2.2-1.el7: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=879986 - uwsgi-2.0.16-1.el7: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1044001 - moreutils-0.57-1.el7: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=703215 - nginx-1.12.2-2.el7: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1054143 - scsi-target-utils-1.0.55-4.el7: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=710762 Can we do straight rebuilds from EPEL for those or is it more complicated than that ? [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/openstack-distribution-packages David Moreau Simard Senior Software Engineer | OpenStack RDO dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]

6 years, 6 months

2
1
0 / 0

How to add new packages?

by Sam P

Hi all, I am Sampath Priyankara and NEW to RDO. I work for NTT and the current PTL for OpenStack Masakari project [1]. Recently, some of Masakari users asked me for RPM packages. It seems to me that, adding them to RDO is the correct way to proceed. I did a quick survey on how to add masakari components [2] to RDO, but couldn't find any doc or useful information on how to do that. Any link or information regarding to this would be highly appreciated. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Masakari [2] https://releases.openstack.org/teams/masakari.html --- Regards, Sampath

6 years, 6 months

2
2
0 / 0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : RDO meeting

by hguemar＠fedoraproject.org

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: RDO meeting on 2018-05-30 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At rdo(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: RDO IRC meeting [Agenda at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Meeting ](https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Meeting) Every Wednesday on #rdo on Freenode IRC Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/8759/

6 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : RDO meeting

by hguemar＠fedoraproject.org

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: RDO meeting on 2018-05-30 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At rdo(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: RDO IRC meeting [Agenda at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Meeting ](https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Meeting) Every Wednesday on #rdo on Freenode IRC Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/2017/

6 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : RDO Office Hours

by chkumar246＠gmail.com

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: RDO Office Hours on 2018-05-29 from 13:30:00 to 14:30:00 UTC The meeting will be about: The meeting will be about RDO Office Hour. Aim: To keep up with increasing participation, we'll host office hours to add more easy fixes and provide mentoring to newcomers. [Agenda at RDO Office Hour easyfixes](https://review.rdoproject.org/etherpad/p/rdo-office-hour-easyf... Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/6374/

6 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

GDPR and the RDO Community

by Rain Leander

Hello everyone: Within the RDO Community and Red Hat, of course your privacy is important and we will continue to be transparent about what information we collect, how we use it and about your rights in managing that information. However, because of the high demands made by the General Data Projection Regulation (GDPR), a law passed in the European Union, we have made some explicit changes in our privacy statement. [0] If there are any questions, concerns, or requests to see your data or opt-out, please email privacy(a)rdoproject.org. Thanks so much, ~r. [0] https://www.rdoproject.org/legal/privacy/ -- K Rain Leander OpenStack Community Liaison Open Source and Standards Team https://www.rdoproject.org/ http://community.redhat.com

6 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

Quack

by Marc Dequènes (Duck)

I love quacking

6 years, 6 months

1
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

dev May 2018