10:47 p.m.
Hi,
In a follow up to my previous post about image building in tripleo/RDO,
do we currently have a timeline, process, or anything else regarding
when rebuilt tripleo images are rebuilt and uploaded to
buildlogs.centos.org? E.g. if you look at the mitaka images
http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/tripleo_images/mitaka/cbs/
They were built back in April. Can we get something in place to have
them updated more frequently?
Regards,
Graeme
--
Graeme Gillies
Principal Systems Administrator
Openstack Infrastructure
Red Hat Australia
11:06 p.m.
On Aug 18, 2016 5:48 AM, "Graeme Gillies" <ggillies(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
In a follow up to my previous post about image building in tripleo/RDO,
do we currently have a timeline, process, or anything else regarding
when rebuilt tripleo images are rebuilt and uploaded to
buildlogs.centos.org? E.g. if you look at the mitaka images
http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/tripleo_images/mitaka/cbs/
They were built back in April. Can we get something in place to have
them updated more frequently?
Regards,
Graeme
--
Graeme Gillies
Principal Systems Administrator
Openstack Infrastructure
Red Hat Australia
_______________________________________________
rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
Graeme thanks for raising this.
RDO folks, should we not be building images every time we promote? If we
are doing that, should we not be linking them more obviously?
-Hugh
2:14 a.m.
2016-08-18 6:06 GMT+02:00 Hugh Brock <hbrock(a)redhat.com>:
On Aug 18, 2016 5:48 AM, "Graeme Gillies"
<ggillies(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In a follow up to my previous post about image building in tripleo/RDO,
> do we currently have a timeline, process, or anything else regarding
> when rebuilt tripleo images are rebuilt and uploaded to
> buildlogs.centos.org? E.g. if you look at the mitaka images
>
>
> http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/tripleo_images/mitaka/cbs/
>
> They were built back in April. Can we get something in place to have
> them updated more frequently?
>
https://ci.centos.org/artifacts/rdo/images/
> Regards,
>
> Graeme
>
> --
> Graeme Gillies
> Principal Systems Administrator
> Openstack Infrastructure
> Red Hat Australia
Seems like sync is broken.
@KB; maybe, I'm missing some context but since John is in PTO, can you
look at it?
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10697
Regards,
H.
_______________________________________________
rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
Graeme thanks for raising this.
RDO folks, should we not be building images every time we promote? If we are
doing that, should we not be linking them more obviously?
-Hugh
_______________________________________________
rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
2:42 a.m.
On 18/08/16 17:14, Haïkel wrote:
2016-08-18 6:06 GMT+02:00 Hugh Brock <hbrock(a)redhat.com>:
> On Aug 18, 2016 5:48 AM, "Graeme Gillies" <ggillies(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In a follow up to my previous post about image building in tripleo/RDO,
>> do we currently have a timeline, process, or anything else regarding
>> when rebuilt tripleo images are rebuilt and uploaded to
>> buildlogs.centos.org? E.g. if you look at the mitaka images
>>
>>
>> http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/tripleo_images/mitaka/cbs/
>>
>> They were built back in April. Can we get something in place to have
>> them updated more frequently?
>>
https://ci.centos.org/artifacts/rdo/images/
If you look under the mitaka directory at this link, you will notice the
only directory there is delorean.
I'm not talking about delorean, I'm not interested in that. I'm
interested in images built using the package manifests from
centos-release-openstack-mitaka and its dependencies (Ceph, qemu-ev, etc).
The images at the link I gave originally are images that were built with
those CBS, non-delorean, repos
Regards,
Graeme
>> Regards,
>>
>> Graeme
>>
>> --
>> Graeme Gillies
>> Principal Systems Administrator
>> Openstack Infrastructure
>> Red Hat Australia
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rdo-list mailing list
>> rdo-list(a)redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>
>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
>
> Graeme thanks for raising this.
>
> RDO folks, should we not be building images every time we promote? If we are
> doing that, should we not be linking them more obviously?
>
> -Hugh
>
Seems like sync is broken.
@KB; maybe, I'm missing some context but since John is in PTO, can you
look at it?
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10697
Regards,
H.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rdo-list mailing list
> rdo-list(a)redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>
> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
--
Graeme Gillies
Principal Systems Administrator
Openstack Infrastructure
Red Hat Australia
3:45 a.m.
2016-08-18 9:42 GMT+02:00 Graeme Gillies <ggillies(a)redhat.com>:
On 18/08/16 17:14, Haïkel wrote:
> 2016-08-18 6:06 GMT+02:00 Hugh Brock <hbrock(a)redhat.com>:
>> On Aug 18, 2016 5:48 AM, "Graeme Gillies" <ggillies(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In a follow up to my previous post about image building in tripleo/RDO,
>>> do we currently have a timeline, process, or anything else regarding
>>> when rebuilt tripleo images are rebuilt and uploaded to
>>> buildlogs.centos.org? E.g. if you look at the mitaka images
>>>
>>>
>>> http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/tripleo_images/mitaka/cbs/
>>>
>>> They were built back in April. Can we get something in place to have
>>> them updated more frequently?
>>>
>
> https://ci.centos.org/artifacts/rdo/images/
If you look under the mitaka directory at this link, you will notice the
only directory there is delorean.
I'm not talking about delorean, I'm not interested in that. I'm
interested in images built using the package manifests from
centos-release-openstack-mitaka and its dependencies (Ceph, qemu-ev, etc).
The images at the link I gave originally are images that were built with
those CBS, non-delorean, repos
Regards,
Graeme
The thing is there's no automation to periodically rebuild and test
those images.
Regards,
H.
>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Graeme
>>>
>>> --
>>> Graeme Gillies
>>> Principal Systems Administrator
>>> Openstack Infrastructure
>>> Red Hat Australia
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rdo-list mailing list
>>> rdo-list(a)redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
>>
>> Graeme thanks for raising this.
>>
>> RDO folks, should we not be building images every time we promote? If we are
>> doing that, should we not be linking them more obviously?
>>
>> -Hugh
>>
>
> Seems like sync is broken.
>
> @KB; maybe, I'm missing some context but since John is in PTO, can you
> look at it?
> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10697
>
> Regards,
> H.
>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rdo-list mailing list
>> rdo-list(a)redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>
>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
--
Graeme Gillies
Principal Systems Administrator
Openstack Infrastructure
Red Hat Australia
4:05 a.m.
On 18/08/16 18:45, Haïkel wrote:
2016-08-18 9:42 GMT+02:00 Graeme Gillies
<ggillies(a)redhat.com>:
> On 18/08/16 17:14, Haïkel wrote:
>> 2016-08-18 6:06 GMT+02:00 Hugh Brock <hbrock(a)redhat.com>:
>>> On Aug 18, 2016 5:48 AM, "Graeme Gillies"
<ggillies(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> In a follow up to my previous post about image building in tripleo/RDO,
>>>> do we currently have a timeline, process, or anything else regarding
>>>> when rebuilt tripleo images are rebuilt and uploaded to
>>>> buildlogs.centos.org? E.g. if you look at the mitaka images
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/tripleo_images/mitaka/cbs/
>>>>
>>>> They were built back in April. Can we get something in place to have
>>>> them updated more frequently?
>>>>
>>
>> https://ci.centos.org/artifacts/rdo/images/
>
> If you look under the mitaka directory at this link, you will notice the
> only directory there is delorean.
>
> I'm not talking about delorean, I'm not interested in that. I'm
> interested in images built using the package manifests from
> centos-release-openstack-mitaka and its dependencies (Ceph, qemu-ev, etc).
>
> The images at the link I gave originally are images that were built with
> those CBS, non-delorean, repos
>
> Regards,
>
> Graeme
>
The thing is there's no automation to periodically rebuild and test
those images.
Regards,
H.
Ok no problem, now we have identified that, how can we go about getting
some automation to do this? It would ideally happen everytime we ship a
new package in those official channels, but failing, that, could we do
this periodically?
Regards,
Graeme
>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Graeme
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Graeme Gillies
>>>> Principal Systems Administrator
>>>> Openstack Infrastructure
>>>> Red Hat Australia
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rdo-list mailing list
>>>> rdo-list(a)redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
>>>
>>> Graeme thanks for raising this.
>>>
>>> RDO folks, should we not be building images every time we promote? If we are
>>> doing that, should we not be linking them more obviously?
>>>
>>> -Hugh
>>>
>>
>> Seems like sync is broken.
>>
>> @KB; maybe, I'm missing some context but since John is in PTO, can you
>> look at it?
>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10697
>>
>> Regards,
>> H.
>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rdo-list mailing list
>>> rdo-list(a)redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
>
>
> --
> Graeme Gillies
> Principal Systems Administrator
> Openstack Infrastructure
> Red Hat Australia
--
Graeme Gillies
Principal Systems Administrator
Openstack Infrastructure
Red Hat Australia
2:59 a.m.
________________________________
From: rdo-list-bounces(a)redhat.com <rdo-list-bounces(a)redhat.com> on behalf of Haïkel
<hguemar(a)fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 3:14 AM
To: Hugh Brock
Cc: Karanbir Singh; rdo-list
Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Updated mitaka stable images for tripleo
2016-08-18 6:06 GMT+02:00 Hugh Brock <hbrock(a)redhat.com>:
On Aug 18, 2016 5:48 AM, "Graeme Gillies"
<ggillies(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In a follow up to my previous post about image building in tripleo/RDO,
> do we currently have a timeline, process, or anything else regarding
> when rebuilt tripleo images are rebuilt and uploaded to
> buildlogs.centos.org? E.g. if you look at the mitaka images
>
>
> http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/tripleo_images/mitaka/cbs/
>
> They were built back in April. Can we get something in place to have
> them updated more frequently?
>
https://ci.centos.org/artifacts/rdo/images/
I believe that here undercloud.qcow2 has been built in way different
from Standard TripleO. TripleO QS never/nowhere does
# openstack overcloud image build --all
Explained in details here
<https://bluejeans.com/playback/s/HNxEKizUWLsgcW3N7zvQdwFPRgBiQ2OQ8cR6frv9...
Blue Jeans Network | Video Collaboration in the
Cloud<https://bluejeans.com/s/a5ua/>
bluejeans.com
Blue Jeans Network - Interoperable, Cloud-based, Affordable Video Conferencing Service
Just in case snapshot is attached
Thanks
Boris
<https://ci.centos.org/artifacts/rdo/images/>
> Regards,
>
> Graeme
>
> --
> Graeme Gillies
> Principal Systems Administrator
> Openstack Infrastructure
> Red Hat Australia
Seems like sync is broken.
@KB; maybe, I'm missing some context but since John is in PTO, can you
look at it?
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10697
Regards,
H.
_______________________________________________
rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
Graeme thanks for raising this.
RDO folks, should we not be building images every time we promote? If we are
doing that, should we not be linking them more obviously?
-Hugh
_______________________________________________
rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
_______________________________________________
rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
6:55 p.m.
Sent from my mobile
On Aug 18, 2016 03:59, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:
________________________________
From: rdo-list-bounces(a)redhat.com <rdo-list-bounces(a)redhat.com> on behalf
of
Haïkel <hguemar(a)fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 3:14 AM
To: Hugh Brock
Cc: Karanbir Singh; rdo-list
Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Updated mitaka stable images for tripleo
2016-08-18 6:06 GMT+02:00 Hugh Brock <hbrock(a)redhat.com>:
> On Aug 18, 2016 5:48 AM, "Graeme Gillies" <ggillies(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In a follow up to my previous post about image building in tripleo/RDO,
>> do we currently have a timeline, process, or anything else regarding
>> when rebuilt tripleo images are rebuilt and uploaded to
>> buildlogs.centos.org? E.g. if you look at the mitaka images
>>
>>
>>
http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/tripleo_images/mitaka/cbs/
>>
>> They were built back in April. Can we get something in place to have
>> them updated more frequently?
>>
https://ci.centos.org/artifacts/rdo/images/
I believe that here undercloud.qcow2 has been built in way different
from Standard TripleO. TripleO QS never/nowhere does
# openstack overcloud image build --all
Explained in details here
https://bluejeans.com/s/a5ua/
Blue Jeans Network | Video Collaboration in the Cloud
bluejeans.com
Blue Jeans Network - Interoperable, Cloud-based, Affordable Video
Conferencing
Service
Just in case snapshot is attached
Fyi
Unfortunately that is already out of date. Tripleo-ci no longer creates an
undercloud image.
I'll send more details later.
Thanks
Boris
>> Regards,
>>
>> Graeme
>>
>> --
>> Graeme Gillies
>> Principal Systems Administrator
>> Openstack Infrastructure
>> Red Hat Australia
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rdo-list mailing list
>> rdo-list(a)redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>
>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
>
> Graeme thanks for raising this.
>
> RDO folks, should we not be building images every time we promote? If
we are
> doing that, should we not be linking them more obviously?
>
> -Hugh
>
Seems like sync is broken.
@KB; maybe, I'm missing some context but since John is in PTO, can you
look at it?
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10697
Regards,
H.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rdo-list mailing list
> rdo-list(a)redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>
> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
_______________________________________________
rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
_______________________________________________
rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
1:29 a.m.
________________________________
From: Wesley Hayutin <whayutin(a)redhat.com Sent:
Friday, August 19, 2016 7:55 PM
To: Boris Derzhavets
Cc: Karanbir Singh; Haïkel; rdo-list; Hugh Brock
Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Updated mitaka stable images for tripleo
Sent from my mobile
On Aug 18, 2016 03:59, "Boris Derzhavets"
<bderzhavets@hotmail.com<mailto:bderzhavets@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Regarding pushing TripleO QuickStart to bare metal :-
Does it prevent from setting up undercloud as VM on bare metal node,
so that QuickStart CI via delorean trunks could be utilized in the same
way as in virtual environment ?
Thank you very much for responding.
Boris.
> Thanks
> Boris
>
>> Regards,
> > > >> Graeme
> > > >> --
> >> Graeme Gillies
> >> Principal Systems Administrator
> >> Openstack Infrastructure
> >> Red Hat Australia
> > > >>
_______________________________________________
> >> rdo-list mailing list
> >> rdo-list@redhat.com<mailto:rdo-list@redhat.com > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> > > >> To unsubscribe:
rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com<mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com > > > Graeme thanks for raising
this.
> > > RDO folks, should we not be building images every
time we promote? If we are
> > doing that, should we not be linking them more obviously?
> > > -Hugh
> > Seems like sync is broken.
> @KB; maybe, I'm missing some context but since John is
in PTO, can you
> look at it?
> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10697
> Regards,
> H.
> > >
_______________________________________________
> > rdo-list mailing list
> > rdo-list@redhat.com<mailto:rdo-list@redhat.com > >
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> > > To unsubscribe:
rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com<mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com >
_______________________________________________
> rdo-list mailing list
> rdo-list@redhat.com<mailto:rdo-list@redhat.com >
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> To unsubscribe:
rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com<mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com >
_______________________________________________
> rdo-list mailing list
> rdo-list@redhat.com<mailto:rdo-list@redhat.com >
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> To unsubscribe:
rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com<mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com
________________________________
From: rdo-list-bounces@redhat.com<mailto:rdo-list-bounces@redhat.com>
<rdo-list-bounces@redhat.com<mailto:rdo-list-bounces@redhat.com>> on behalf of
Haïkel <hguemar@fedoraproject.org<mailto:hguemar@fedoraproject.org> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 3:14 AM
To: Hugh Brock
Cc: Karanbir Singh; rdo-list
Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Updated mitaka stable images for tripleo
2016-08-18 6:06 GMT+02:00 Hugh Brock
<hbrock@redhat.com<mailto:hbrock@redhat.com>>:
> On Aug 18, 2016 5:48 AM, "Graeme Gillies"
<ggillies@redhat.com<mailto:ggillies@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> In a follow up to my previous post about image
building in tripleo/RDO,
>> do we currently have a timeline, process, or anything else regarding
>> when rebuilt tripleo images are rebuilt and uploaded to
>> buildlogs.centos.org<http://buildlogs.centos.org>? E.g. if you look at the
mitaka images
> > >>
http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/tripleo_images/mitaka/cbs/
> >> They were built back in April. Can we get something
in place to have
>> them updated more frequently?
>
https://ci.centos.org/artifacts/rdo/images/
I believe that here undercloud.qcow2 has been built in way different
from Standard TripleO. TripleO QS never/nowhere does
# openstack overcloud image build --all
Explained in details here
https://bluejeans.com/s/a5ua/
Blue Jeans Network | Video Collaboration in the Cloud
bluejeans.com<http://bluejeans.com Blue
Jeans Network - Interoperable, Cloud-based, Affordable Video Conferencing Service
Just in case snapshot is attached
Fyi
Unfortunately that is already out of date. Tripleo-ci no longer creates an undercloud
image.
I'll send more details later.
3:55 a.m.
Hi Graeme
what I usually do is to pickup those images then run "yum update" on them
(I use virt-customize) to get the last updates from sig repos.
Regards
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:47 AM, Graeme Gillies <ggillies(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
In a follow up to my previous post about image building in tripleo/RDO,
do we currently have a timeline, process, or anything else regarding
when rebuilt tripleo images are rebuilt and uploaded to
buildlogs.centos.org? E.g. if you look at the mitaka images
http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/tripleo_
images/mitaka/cbs/
They were built back in April. Can we get something in place to have
them updated more frequently?
Regards,
Graeme
--
Graeme Gillies
Principal Systems Administrator
Openstack Infrastructure
Red Hat Australia
_______________________________________________
rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
3046
days inactive
3048
days old
9 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Boris Derzhavets -
Graeme Gillies -
Haïkel -
Hugh Brock -
Pedro Sousa -
Wesley Hayutin