10:57 a.m.
Hi folks,
I've managed to create a fairly well working packstack-answer file, that I
used for liberty installations, with a 4-multi-node setup, eventually
handling nested kvm, live-migration, LBAAS, etc, so I am quite happy with
that.
Now, my aim is Identity v3. From the packstack answer-file, it seems
supported, but I cant get it to work. I couldnt get it to work with
liberty, and now testing with Mitaka, it still doesnt work, failing on:
ERROR : Error appeared during Puppet run: 10.9.24.100_cinder.pp
Error: Could not prefetch cinder_type provider 'openstack': Execution of
'/usr/bin/openstack volume type list --quiet --format csv --long' returned
1: Expecting to find domain in project - the server could not comply with
the request since it is either malformed or otherwise incorrect. The client
is assumed to be in error. (HTTP 400) (Request-ID:
req-d8cccfb9-c060-4cdd-867d-603bf70ebf24)
I think this is also the same error I got, during my liberty tests.
Has anyone got this working? Should it work?
Another this which I just tested briefly, was to have swift-services on
separate nodes(instead of on the controller, as I have now), but I couldnt
get the syntax correct.
Anyone have an answer-file example that configures multiple swift-nodes?
Many Thanks,
Taisto Qvist
11:06 a.m.
Fairly certain Cinder is a known problem against v3 in Packstack [1]
but I don't have the details.
[1]:
https://github.com/openstack/packstack/blob/master/releasenotes/notes/key...
David Moreau Simard
Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO
dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Taisto Qvist <taisto.qvist(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi folks,
I've managed to create a fairly well working packstack-answer file, that I
used for liberty installations, with a 4-multi-node setup, eventually
handling nested kvm, live-migration, LBAAS, etc, so I am quite happy with
that.
Now, my aim is Identity v3. From the packstack answer-file, it seems
supported, but I cant get it to work. I couldnt get it to work with liberty,
and now testing with Mitaka, it still doesnt work, failing on:
ERROR : Error appeared during Puppet run: 10.9.24.100_cinder.pp
Error: Could not prefetch cinder_type provider 'openstack': Execution of
'/usr/bin/openstack volume type list --quiet --format csv --long' returned
1: Expecting to find domain in project - the server could not comply with
the request since it is either malformed or otherwise incorrect. The client
is assumed to be in error. (HTTP 400) (Request-ID:
req-d8cccfb9-c060-4cdd-867d-603bf70ebf24)
I think this is also the same error I got, during my liberty tests.
Has anyone got this working? Should it work?
Another this which I just tested briefly, was to have swift-services on
separate nodes(instead of on the controller, as I have now), but I couldnt
get the syntax correct.
Anyone have an answer-file example that configures multiple swift-nodes?
Many Thanks,
Taisto Qvist
_______________________________________________
rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
11:32 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
Fairly certain Cinder is a known problem against v3 in Packstack [1]
but I don't have the details.
[1]:
https://github.com/openstack/packstack/blob/master/releasenotes/notes/key...
We had a patch to fix that merged in Mitaka some time ago [1], which depended on a
puppet-cinder patch [2]. We have not yet released a new package to the CBS repos, but you
could try updating your openstack-packstack, openstack-packstack-puppet and
openstack-puppet-modules using the packages from RDO stable/mitaka Trunk [3].
Regards,
Javier
[1] - https://review.openstack.org/323690
[2] - https://review.openstack.org/320956
[3] - http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/rdo-trunk-mitaka-tested/
David Moreau Simard
Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO
dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Taisto Qvist <taisto.qvist(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've managed to create a fairly well working packstack-answer file, that I
> used for liberty installations, with a 4-multi-node setup, eventually
> handling nested kvm, live-migration, LBAAS, etc, so I am quite happy with
> that.
>
> Now, my aim is Identity v3. From the packstack answer-file, it seems
> supported, but I cant get it to work. I couldnt get it to work with
> liberty,
> and now testing with Mitaka, it still doesnt work, failing on:
>
> ERROR : Error appeared during Puppet run: 10.9.24.100_cinder.pp
> Error: Could not prefetch cinder_type provider 'openstack': Execution of
> '/usr/bin/openstack volume type list --quiet --format csv --long' returned
> 1: Expecting to find domain in project - the server could not comply with
> the request since it is either malformed or otherwise incorrect. The client
> is assumed to be in error. (HTTP 400) (Request-ID:
> req-d8cccfb9-c060-4cdd-867d-603bf70ebf24)
>
> I think this is also the same error I got, during my liberty tests.
>
> Has anyone got this working? Should it work?
>
> Another this which I just tested briefly, was to have swift-services on
> separate nodes(instead of on the controller, as I have now), but I couldnt
> get the syntax correct.
>
> Anyone have an answer-file example that configures multiple swift-nodes?
>
> Many Thanks,
> Taisto Qvist
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rdo-list mailing list
> rdo-list(a)redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>
> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
_______________________________________________
rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
10:51 a.m.
Thanks for the tips everyone.
I found
https://www.linux.com/blog/attempt-set-rdo-mitaka-any-given-time-delorean...,
and but that also failed with idv3, but on heat issues instead.
I am unfortunately completely lost/confused/overwhelmed with all the
different git/repository information found in different places, and
building my own RPMs feels way to complicated as someone linked to.
So I'll just clearly demonstrate my NooB-ness, by asking:
If I follow the instructions on "
https://www.rdoproject.org/install/quickstart/";, how do I modify them to
update my packstack-* to use the newer modules mentioned below?
Regards
Taisto
2016-08-26 18:32 GMT+02:00 Javier Pena <javier.pena(a)redhat.com>:
----- Original Message -----
> Fairly certain Cinder is a known problem against v3 in Packstack [1]
> but I don't have the details.
>
> [1]:
> https://github.com/openstack/packstack/blob/master/
releasenotes/notes/keystone-v3-note-065b6302b49285f3.yaml
>
We had a patch to fix that merged in Mitaka some time ago [1], which
depended on a puppet-cinder patch [2]. We have not yet released a new
package to the CBS repos, but you could try updating your
openstack-packstack, openstack-packstack-puppet and
openstack-puppet-modules using the packages from RDO stable/mitaka Trunk
[3].
Regards,
Javier
[1] - https://review.openstack.org/323690
[2] - https://review.openstack.org/320956
[3] - http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/rdo-
trunk-mitaka-tested/
> David Moreau Simard
> Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO
>
> dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Taisto Qvist <taisto.qvist(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I've managed to create a fairly well working packstack-answer file,
that I
> > used for liberty installations, with a 4-multi-node setup, eventually
> > handling nested kvm, live-migration, LBAAS, etc, so I am quite happy
with
> > that.
> >
> > Now, my aim is Identity v3. From the packstack answer-file, it seems
> > supported, but I cant get it to work. I couldnt get it to work with
> > liberty,
> > and now testing with Mitaka, it still doesnt work, failing on:
> >
> > ERROR : Error appeared during Puppet run: 10.9.24.100_cinder.pp
> > Error: Could not prefetch cinder_type provider 'openstack': Execution
of
> > '/usr/bin/openstack volume type list --quiet --format csv --long'
returned
> > 1: Expecting to find domain in project - the server could not comply
with
> > the request since it is either malformed or otherwise incorrect. The
client
> > is assumed to be in error. (HTTP 400) (Request-ID:
> > req-d8cccfb9-c060-4cdd-867d-603bf70ebf24)
> >
> >
1:03 p.m.
Please, see detailed instructions here :-
Backport upstream commits to stable RDO Mitaka release && Deployments with
Keystone API V3
http://bderzhavets.blogspot.ru/2016/05/backport-upstream-commits-to-stabl...
[https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-8KYSnMrQGmo/V0LYnpQFOkI/AAAAAAAAGrE/0WGJJh8kLe...
Xen Virtualization on Linux and Solaris: Backport upstream commits to stable RDO Mitaka
release && Deployments with Keystone API
V3<http://bderzhavets.blogspot.ru/2016/05/backport-upstream-commits-to-stable-rdo.html>
bderzhavets.blogspot.ru
Boris.
________________________________
From: rdo-list-bounces(a)redhat.com <rdo-list-bounces(a)redhat.com> on behalf of Taisto
Qvist <taisto.qvist(a)gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 6:51:55 PM
To: Javier Pena
Cc: rdo-list
Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Is Keystone/Identity-v3 supported by RDO Packstack? Multi-node
swift --answer-file?
Thanks for the tips everyone.
I found https://www.linux.com/blog/attempt-set-rdo-mitaka-any-given-time-delorean...,
and but that also failed with idv3, but on heat issues instead.
I am unfortunately completely lost/confused/overwhelmed with all the different
git/repository information found in different places, and building my own RPMs feels way
to complicated as someone linked to.
So I'll just clearly demonstrate my NooB-ness, by asking:
If I follow the instructions on
"https://www.rdoproject.org/install/quickstart/", how do I modify them to update
my packstack-* to use the newer modules mentioned below?
Regards
Taisto
2016-08-26 18:32 GMT+02:00 Javier Pena
<javier.pena@redhat.com<mailto:javier.pena@redhat.com>>:
----- Original Message -----
Fairly certain Cinder is a known problem against v3 in Packstack [1]
but I don't have the details.
[1]:
https://github.com/openstack/packstack/blob/master/releasenotes/notes/key...
We had a patch to fix that merged in Mitaka some time ago [1], which depended on a
puppet-cinder patch [2]. We have not yet released a new package to the CBS repos, but you
could try updating your openstack-packstack, openstack-packstack-puppet and
openstack-puppet-modules using the packages from RDO stable/mitaka Trunk [3].
Regards,
Javier
[1] - https://review.openstack.org/323690
[2] - https://review.openstack.org/320956
[3] - http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/rdo-trunk-mitaka-tested/
David Moreau Simard
Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO
dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Taisto Qvist
<taisto.qvist@gmail.com<mailto:taisto.qvist@gmail.com>>
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've managed to create a fairly well working packstack-answer file, that I
> used for liberty installations, with a 4-multi-node setup, eventually
> handling nested kvm, live-migration, LBAAS, etc, so I am quite happy with
> that.
>
> Now, my aim is Identity v3. From the packstack answer-file, it seems
> supported, but I cant get it to work. I couldnt get it to work with
> liberty,
> and now testing with Mitaka, it still doesnt work, failing on:
>
> ERROR : Error appeared during Puppet run: 10.9.24.100_cinder.pp
> Error: Could not prefetch cinder_type provider 'openstack': Execution of
> '/usr/bin/openstack volume type list --quiet --format csv --long' returned
> 1: Expecting to find domain in project - the server could not comply with
> the request since it is either malformed or otherwise incorrect. The client
> is assumed to be in error. (HTTP 400) (Request-ID:
> req-d8cccfb9-c060-4cdd-867d-603bf70ebf24)
>
>
8:51 p.m.
On 08/31/2016 02:03 PM, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
Please, see detailed instructions here :-
Backport upstream commits to stable RDO Mitaka release &&
Deployments with Keystone API V3
http://bderzhavets.blogspot.ru/2016/05/backport-upstream-commits-to-stabl...
<http://bderzhavets.blogspot.ru/2016/05/backport-upstream-commits-to-stabl...
Xen Virtualization on Linux and Solaris: Backport upstream commits to
stable RDO Mitaka release && Deployments with Keystone API V3
<http://bderzhavets.blogspot.ru/2016/05/backport-upstream-commits-to-stabl...
bderzhavets.blogspot.ru
Boris.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* rdo-list-bounces(a)redhat.com <rdo-list-bounces(a)redhat.com> on
behalf of Taisto Qvist <taisto.qvist(a)gmail.com>
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 31, 2016 6:51:55 PM
*To:* Javier Pena
*Cc:* rdo-list
*Subject:* Re: [rdo-list] Is Keystone/Identity-v3 supported by RDO
Packstack? Multi-node swift --answer-file?
Thanks for the tips everyone.
I found
https://www.linux.com/blog/attempt-set-rdo-mitaka-any-given-time-delorean...,
and but that also failed with idv3, but on heat issues instead.
I am unfortunately completely lost/confused/overwhelmed with all the
different git/repository information found in different places, and
building my own RPMs feels way to complicated as someone linked to.
So I'll just clearly demonstrate my NooB-ness, by asking:
If I follow the instructions on
"https://www.rdoproject.org/install/quickstart/", how do I modify them
to update my packstack-* to use the newer modules mentioned below?
Regards
Taisto
We did an Anisble based Proof of concept with it last summer:
https://github.com/admiyo/rippowam/tree/master/roles/packstack
Went far beyond just V3, to include Kerberos and TLS everywhere. But it
is do-able.
2016-08-26 18:32 GMT+02:00 Javier Pena <javier.pena(a)redhat.com
<mailto:javier.pena@redhat.com>>:
----- Original Message -----
> Fairly certain Cinder is a known problem against v3 in Packstack [1]
> but I don't have the details.
>
> [1]:
>
https://github.com/openstack/packstack/blob/master/releasenotes/notes/key...
<https://github.com/openstack/packstack/blob/master/releasenotes/notes/key...
>
We had a patch to fix that merged in Mitaka some time ago [1],
which depended on a puppet-cinder patch [2]. We have not yet
released a new package to the CBS repos, but you could try
updating your openstack-packstack, openstack-packstack-puppet and
openstack-puppet-modules using the packages from RDO stable/mitaka
Trunk [3].
Regards,
Javier
[1] - https://review.openstack.org/323690
<https://review.openstack.org/323690>
[2] - https://review.openstack.org/320956
<https://review.openstack.org/320956>
[3] -
http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/rdo-trunk-mitaka-tested/
<http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/rdo-trunk-mitaka-tested...
> David Moreau Simard
> Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO
>
> dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Taisto Qvist
<taisto.qvist(a)gmail.com <mailto:taisto.qvist@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I've managed to create a fairly well working packstack-answer
file, that I
> > used for liberty installations, with a 4-multi-node setup,
eventually
> > handling nested kvm, live-migration, LBAAS, etc, so I am quite
happy with
> > that.
> >
> > Now, my aim is Identity v3. From the packstack answer-file, it
seems
> > supported, but I cant get it to work. I couldnt get it to work
with
> > liberty,
> > and now testing with Mitaka, it still doesnt work, failing on:
> >
> > ERROR : Error appeared during Puppet run: 10.9.24.100_cinder.pp
> > Error: Could not prefetch cinder_type provider 'openstack':
Execution of
> > '/usr/bin/openstack volume type list --quiet --format csv
--long' returned
> > 1: Expecting to find domain in project - the server could not
comply with
> > the request since it is either malformed or otherwise
incorrect. The client
> > is assumed to be in error. (HTTP 400) (Request-ID:
> > req-d8cccfb9-c060-4cdd-867d-603bf70ebf24)
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe(a)redhat.com
3:50 a.m.
________________________________
From: rdo-list-bounces(a)redhat.com <rdo-list-bounces(a)redhat.com> on behalf of Adam
Young <ayoung(a)redhat.com Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016
4:51 AM
To: rdo-list(a)redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Is Keystone/Identity-v3 supported by RDO Packstack? Multi-node
swift --answer-file?
On 08/31/2016 02:03 PM, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
Please, see detailed instructions here :-
Backport upstream commits to stable RDO Mitaka release && Deployments with
Keystone API V3
http://bderzhavets.blogspot.ru/2016/05/backport-upstream-commits-to-stabl...
[https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-8KYSnMrQGmo/V0LYnpQFOkI/AAAAAAAAGrE/0WGJJh8kLe...
Xen Virtualization on Linux and Solaris: Backport upstream commits to stable RDO Mitaka
release && Deployments with Keystone API
V3<http://bderzhavets.blogspot.ru/2016/05/backport-upstream-commits-to-stable-rdo.html bderzhavets.blogspot.ru
Would you like to see moderated version of post above :-
https://www.linux.com/blog/backport-upstream-commits-stable-rdo-mitaka-re...
Backport upstream commits to stable RDO Mitaka release
...<https://www.linux.com/blog/backport-upstream-commits-stable-rdo-mitaka-release-deployments-keystone-api-v3 www.linux.com
Posting bellow is written with intend to avoid waiting until "koji" build will
appear in updates repo of stable RDO Mitaka release, what might take a couple of months
...
I believe that RDO package maintainers are supposed to perform patching (done locally
in my posting to Linux.com) and make this back ports to official RDO Mitaka repos, to
avoid compromising RDO QuickStart Page. By some reasons it didn't happen.
Boris.
________________________________
From: rdo-list-bounces@redhat.com<mailto:rdo-list-bounces@redhat.com>
<rdo-list-bounces@redhat.com><mailto:rdo-list-bounces@redhat.com> on behalf of
Taisto Qvist <taisto.qvist@gmail.com><mailto:taisto.qvist@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 6:51:55 PM
To: Javier Pena
Cc: rdo-list
Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Is Keystone/Identity-v3 supported by RDO Packstack? Multi-node
swift --answer-file?
Thanks for the tips everyone.
I found https://www.linux.com/blog/attempt-set-rdo-mitaka-any-given-time-delorean...,
and but that also failed with idv3, but on heat issues instead.
I am unfortunately completely lost/confused/overwhelmed with all the different
git/repository information found in different places, and building my own RPMs feels way
to complicated as someone linked to.
So I'll just clearly demonstrate my NooB-ness, by asking:
If I follow the instructions on
"https://www.rdoproject.org/install/quickstart/", how do I modify them to update
my packstack-* to use the newer modules mentioned below?
Regards
Taisto
We did an Anisble based Proof of concept with it last summer:
https://github.com/admiyo/rippowam/tree/master/roles/packstack
Went far beyond just V3, to include Kerberos and TLS everywhere. But it is do-able.
2016-08-26 18:32 GMT+02:00 Javier Pena
<javier.pena@redhat.com<mailto:javier.pena@redhat.com>>:
----- Original Message -----
> Fairly certain Cinder is a known problem against v3 in Packstack [1]
> but I don't have the details.
> [1]:
>
https://github.com/openstack/packstack/blob/master/releasenotes/notes/key...
We had a patch to fix that merged in Mitaka some time ago [1], which depended on a
puppet-cinder patch [2]. We have not yet released a new package to the CBS repos, but you
could try updating your openstack-packstack, openstack-packstack-puppet and
openstack-puppet-modules using the packages from RDO stable/mitaka Trunk [3].
Regards,
Javier
[1] - https://review.openstack.org/323690
[2] - https://review.openstack.org/320956
[3] - http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/rdo-trunk-mitaka-tested/
> David Moreau Simard
> Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO
> dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:57
AM, Taisto Qvist <taisto.qvist@gmail.com<mailto:taisto.qvist@gmail.com> > wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > > I've managed to create a fairly well working
packstack-answer file, that I
> > used for liberty installations, with a 4-multi-node setup, eventually
> > handling nested kvm, live-migration, LBAAS, etc, so I am quite happy with
> > that.
> > > Now, my aim is Identity v3. From the packstack
answer-file, it seems
> > supported, but I cant get it to work. I couldnt get it to work with
> > liberty,
> > and now testing with Mitaka, it still doesnt work, failing on:
> > > ERROR : Error appeared during Puppet run:
10.9.24.100_cinder.pp
> > Error: Could not prefetch cinder_type provider 'openstack': Execution
of
> > '/usr/bin/openstack volume type list --quiet --format csv --long'
returned
> > 1: Expecting to find domain in project - the server could not comply with
> > the request since it is either malformed or otherwise incorrect. The client
> > is assumed to be in error. (HTTP 400) (Request-ID:
> > req-d8cccfb9-c060-4cdd-867d-603bf70ebf24)
> >
_______________________________________________
rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list@redhat.com<mailto:rdo-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
To unsubscribe:
rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com<mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com
4:30 p.m.
I believe that RDO package maintainers are supposed to perform
patching
(done locally in my posting to Linux.com) and make this back ports to official RDO
Mitaka repos, to avoid compromising RDO QuickStart Page. By some reasons it didn't
happen.
We've been busy wrapping up Newton release, but in the meantime until
we have next round of minor updates pushed to Mitaka stable repos, you
can use rdo-trunk-mitaka-tested repo with "nightlies" which passed CI,
it is available in rdo-release-mitaka-5 (yum install
https://rdoproject.org/repos/openstack-mitaka/rdo-release-mitaka.rpm
to update):
https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdo-release/blob/mitaka/rdo-testing.r...
Those are RPMs built from stable/mitaka branches so they have all
backports merged upstream, you don't need to patch manually.
Alan
4:32 p.m.
can use rdo-trunk-mitaka-tested repo with "nightlies" which
passed CI,
it is available in rdo-release-mitaka-5 (yum install
https://rdoproject.org/repos/openstack-mitaka/rdo-release-mitaka.rpm
to update):
Forgot to mention, it is not enabled by default, so after updating
rdo-release-mitaka you need to enable it:
# yum-config-manager --enable rdo-trunk-mitaka-tested
3001
days inactive
3018
days old
8 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Adam Young -
Alan Pevec -
Boris Derzhavets -
David Moreau Simard -
Javier Pena -
Taisto Qvist