Re: [rdo-list] Packstack refactor and future ideas
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Pevec" <apevec(a)redhat.com>
To: "Ivan Chavero" <ichavero(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "rdo-list" <rdo-list(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 5:48:07 PM
Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Packstack refactor and future ideas
> I don't agree with this, we can set the untested features as
"experimental"
or "unsupported"
Best is to remove them to make that clear, because no matter what
deprecation warnings you put[*] people will keep using features until
they're gone, giving us bug reports to take care of and without CI to
verify fixes.
It's long-term maintenance burden I am concerned about, for features
which are clearly out of scope.
I understand this, my concern is that if we remove this feature we will leave
users with no tool for doing multinode in a lightweight way and this might
drive off users from testing/adopting RDO.
I'm willing to create CI tests for multinode Packstack in order to maintain
this features.
And believe me it would be easier for me just to drop this features but i really
think users are benefiting from this features.
Cheers,
Ivan