On 26.6.2014 15:33, Perry Myers wrote:
On 06/26/2014 09:23 AM, Shake Chen wrote:
> remove the feature the packstack have been own is not good idea, and
> would affect many user.
Part of the reason for the reduction in scope of Packstack is due to
resource constraints for the team that is working on Packstack, Puppet
and Foreman.
If we could get some folks outside of Red Hat to become upstream
contributors and more importantly maintainers of Packstack, then that
would alleviate some of the scope creep concerns and perhaps Packstack
could be expanded a bit.
But right now with the majority of the effort solely coming from a
handful of Red Hatters, we just don't have the bandwidth and hence the
scope of Packstack was reduced to be purely an all-in-one/demo tool.
Well, it was created as a proof-of-concept/demo tool in the first place.
If you want sophisticated multi-node installer, packstack isn't the
right tool for that job.
Cheers
Jakub