Re: [rdo-list] [Arm-dev] next steps for altarch with ceph and openstack

W dniu 05.07.2016 o 18:38, George Dunlap pisze: > On 05/07/16 16:49, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> W dniu 05.07.2016 o 16:28, Jim Perrin pisze: >>> With the work that Marcin has done for openstack on aarch64, as well >>> as the ceph builds, we need to begin working a plan for publishing >>> these builds to a mirror. I'd like to identify the steps needed, and >>> the ownership for those steps. >>> >>> Thomas please correct/update these as needed >> >> Added few people to Cc: from pre-RH summit threads. >> >>> 1. new tag in cbs for aarch64 build, with modified dist for mitaka. >>> Will ceph need this as well? >> >>> 2. If we wish to re-use the centos-release-openstack-mitaka noarch, >>> dependencies of centos-release-ceph-hammer, centos-release-qemu-ev, >>> centos-release-storage-common, and centos-release-virt-common need >>> to be addressed. >> >> It would be good to populate all those repositories. I opened bugs for >> all tags: >> >> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11084 (openstack) >> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11085 (ceph) >> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11086 (virt/kvm-common) > > I looked at this bug, but I couldn't tell exactly what packages you > wanted in here, and why the existing KVM packages weren't sufficient. > Could you just sketch out a brief summary? You are right. I am sometimes still lost in CentOS repository structure. What is in x86-64 virt/kvm-common repository is present in os/ one for aarch64 already. Only qemu-kvm-ev update (2.7.1 -> 2.10.1) would be nice to have.

So we can kill that dependency from centos-release-openstack-mitaka package. Added note to the bug (I lack permissions to close it as notabug).