On 13/10/15 19:43, Haïkel wrote:
As David said, our infrastructure is scattered and as been a
constantly moving target so I'd consider this a step toward the right
direction.
The advantages of this proposal being:
1. stable infrastructure => less time spent on fixing the infrastructure
2. customizable workflow thanks to zuul which could only result in
improving quality
3. close the gap between upstream and downstream infrastructure
4. self-hosted on RDO => that's a very important one
I don't see any real negative points, so unless someone has a
different proposal, I suggest that we start with a PoC.
As the Liberty cycle is about to finish, we'll get some bandwidth to
work on our infrastructure so this is the best time to discuss this.
Consolidating our infrastructure is a primary goal to open up RDO
governance further.
One thing that I dont understand here is what value this adds over the
CentOS Build Services.. we can integrate with an existing source control
setup ( or use git.c.o ) and we can do fairly extensive test hosting and
a release cadence built on that.
Or is the intention here to host software-factory as a RDO specific UI
backed by the CentOS pipeline ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 |
http://www.karan.org/ |
twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key :
http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc