Re: [rdo-dev] [Octavia] Providing service VM images in RDO

On 10 January 2018 at 14:41, Assaf Muller <assaf(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 8:10 AM, Alan Pevec <apevec(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> Hi Bernard, >> >> I've added this as a topic for the >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Meeting today, >> with some initial questions to explore. Thanks, I will be there in #rdo >> >> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Bernard Cafarelli <bcafarel(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> * easier install/maintenance for the user, tripleo can consume the >>> image directly (from a package) >> >> How do you plan to distribute the image, wrapped inside RPM? If possible, that is my initial idea yes (easier to fetch, and allows tracking available updates with yum) >> >>> * ensuring up-to-date amphora images (to match the controller version, >>> for security updates, …) >> >> That's the most critical part of the process to figure out, how to >> automate image updates, >> just run it daily, trigger when included packages change... > > On Octavia patches (because the agent in the image might change), but > it's worth pointing out that other elements in the image may need > updating - Say, on a kernel CVE fix, haproxy update, etc. Maybe on > Octavia changes + on a nightly basis? A side-effect here would be that the user will see a new image available, while there are maybe no real changes. But determining if an image has real changes may not be easy (thinking out loud, comparing the installed packages versions?) > >> >>> * allow to test and confirm the amphora works properly with latest >>> changes, including enforcing SELinux (CentOS upstream gate runs in >>> permissive) >> >> And that's the second part, which CI job would test it properly? A bit outside of the RDO pipeline, tripleo CI would use it to test Octavia deployments (I will check here with relevant folks) In the pipeline yes it would be nice to test to confirm that Octavia parts work fine with this repository version >> >>> * use this image in tripleo CI (instead of having to build it there) >> >> Related to the up-to-date issue: how to ensure it's latest for CI? >> >>> * (future) extend this system for other system VM images >> >> Which ones? Currently off the top of my head, Sahara and Trove? Though I did not study it further if it is possible/worth it for these projects Projects like tacker also have service VMs, but these are probably too specific/customizable

>> >> Cheers, >> Alan >> _______________________________________________ >> dev mailing list >> dev(a)lists.rdoproject.org >> http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev >> >> To unsubscribe: dev-unsubscribe(a)lists.rdoproject.org _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev(a)lists.rdoproject.org http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev To unsubscribe: dev-unsubscribe(a)lists.rdoproject.org