Re: [Rdo-list] Packstack tagging
I'd go indeed with the OpenStack cycle milestones, so for Newton:
<master> .. 9.0.0b1 <-- milestone1
9.0.0b1 .. 9.0.0b2 <--- milestone2
9.0.0b2 .. 9.0.0b3 <--- milestone3
9.0.0b3 .. 9.0.0rc1 <--- rc1
9.0.0rc1 .. 9.0.0rcN <--- rcN (if necessary)
9.0.0rcN .. 9.0.0 <--- release
This sounds good
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:38 AM, David Moreau Simard <dms(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> For context, when working on release notes for Packstack with Reno I
> noticed that it relied on git tags for providing version-based release
> notes [1].
>
>> Notes are immutable in that for a given git hash/tag the release notes
>> will be the same. Tagging a commit will change the version description
>> but that is all.
>
> Since Packstack doesn't have any tags right now, Reno builds the
> following notes:
> ---
> =============
> Release Notes
> =============
>
> 0.0.0
> =====
>
> Release notes for Packstack are now managed through Reno.
> ---
>
> Reno allows release notes to be fit between two tags appropriately,
> i.e, like the Nova ones [2].
> Tagging is also relied on by PBR when generating version numbers and
> I'd like to see Packstack transition it's setup to PBR eventually [3].
we can also do this i don't know very much about PBR, i'll check it out
> Packstack is known as 8.0.0 for Mitaka already, so let's
just start
> with that IMO.
> We can start at rc1 instead of b1 at this point I guess - the
> stable/mitaka branch is already cut.
> The proposed scheme also fits puppet module release tags [4].
>
> I don't know if a tag for Liberty is necessary, we can probably start
> for Mitaka.
we should tag liberty also
Cheers,
Ivan