2:10 a.m.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 6:11 PM, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <
amoralej(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:17 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayutin(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 4:57 PM Paul Belanger <pabelanger(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 06:16:04PM +0200, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 5:38 PM, Alan Pevec <apevec(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>> >
>> > > > I think having the two separated images is the only way we can
>> ensure we
>> > > are not polluting the image in the initial phase with packages newer
>> that
>> > > in the stabilized repo.
>> > >
>> > > This should be a small list, are any of those actually included in
>> the
>> > > base image?
>> > >
>> >
>> > Yes, the list is small but we can't be sure if it will change at some
>> > point, and analysing if we are having one of those cases on each
>> change is
>> > too error prone, IMO.
>> >
>> >
>> > > Alternatively, which jobs use "normal" f28 images, could we
switch
>> > > them to use "stabilized" f28 ?
>> > >
>> >
>> > fedora-stable has the required packages to run and build python3
>> packages.
>> > Currently it's missing some requirements for the jobs running on
>> fedora 28
>> > image although it's something we could work on.
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Alan
>> > >
>> >
>> > Maybe I'm underestimating the cost of maintaining two different images
>> for
>> > fedora, but my understanding is that the resources the extra image
>> uses and
>> > the effort to maintain is workable. Please, correct me if i'm wrong.
>>
>> I wouldn't say minimal, but there is a cost. With fedora-29 around the
>> corner,
>> it does mean we have 2 iamges to update now, over one. How long does
>> this image
>> need to live for? When can we get to a point of just using the default
>> fedora
>> image?
>>
>> - Paul
>>
>
> Hey guys,
> Slight tangent, but wondering how far out we are from the CI team having
> to get involved here? Is there any planning required at this point?
>
>
AFAIK, before getting CI involved to create a job to build container we
need to get patches merged in kolla to build containers for fedora/python3.
I'm not sure if there is a ETA for it. Adding Martin to CC, he may have
some estimation for it.
There is absolutely no chance this patch [1] merges into kolla as it. It's
a very ugly hack where I'm basically swapping the centos binary distro to
be based on fedora:28. The idea was to prove feasibility and for you to
have a patch you can pull in your build pipeline that allowed you to build
fedora:28 based images. Integrating fedora based images in kolla properly
would require a lot more work, and that's not really something I'm keen to
do since it would send the wrong message that kolla supports fedora base.
Does it sound reasonable?
Martin
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/582290/
> Thanks
>
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev mailing list
>> dev(a)lists.rdoproject.org
>> http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>
>> To unsubscribe: dev-unsubscribe(a)lists.rdoproject.org
>>
> --
>
> Wes Hayutin
>
> Associate MANAGER
>
> Red Hat
>
> <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> w <cclayton@redhat.com>hayutin(a)redhat.com T: +1919 <+19197544114>
> 4232509 IRC: weshay
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>
> View my calendar and check my availability for meetings HERE
>
<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/b/1/embed?src=whayutin@redhat.com&am...
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev(a)lists.rdoproject.org
http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
To unsubscribe: dev-unsubscribe(a)lists.rdoproject.org