Michael,
The cloud from which Duffy provides virtual machines is not publicly
available, this means we cannot leverage it with Nodepool or Zuul.
We have some tooling to request [1][2] and destroy [3][4] Duffy nodes.
Do you really need a custom image or would requesting a "vanilla"
ppc64le node from Duffy be enough ?
[1]:
https://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/blob/master/jenkins/jobs/scripts/c...
[2]:
https://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/blob/516411b57b378c1bf7374bcf32774...
[3]:
https://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/blob/master/jenkins/jobs/scripts/c...
[4]:
https://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/blob/516411b57b378c1bf7374bcf32774...
David Moreau Simard
Senior Software Engineer | OpenStack RDO
dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Michael Turek
<mjturek(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
Hey all,
Last week I threw up a patch to add tripleo container build jobs for ppc64le
[0]. I would really appreciate getting some eyes on it. I'm not sure how
complete it is, but I do know that we'll need:
a) A provider for ppc64le in nodepool [1]
b) A ppc64le image in nodepool. [2]
There's been some discussion around (a) which led to me being linked to
https://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/CI/Multiarch but I don't think Duffy can work
with nodepool. If I'm wrong about this, please let me know.
As for (b), we would need a node running DIB on a ppc64le node/guest
providing a ppc64le image .
Thanks,
Mike Turek <mjturek on freenode>
[0]
https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/13606/
[1]
https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/13606/4/nodepool/nodepool.yaml@134
[2]
https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/13606/3/nodepool/nodepool.yaml@145
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev(a)lists.rdoproject.org
http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
To unsubscribe: dev-unsubscribe(a)lists.rdoproject.org