On 5 July 2013 06:23, Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Heya,
>
>
> On 07/04/2013 09:29 PM, Jonathan Barber wrote:
>
>
>> On 4 July 2013 06:26, Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981116 -- packstack fails
>>> with mysql-server
>>> dependency as a result of Fedora's switch to mariadb-server
>>>
>>> Anyone else seeing this too on F19?
>>>
>>
>> Me too. I just hacked the params.pp to replace mysqldb with mariadb..
>>
>> I also see problems with:
>> * iptables being disabled in favor of firewalld (the firewall rules are
>> applied against iptables, but not read by firewalld and this means they
> are
>> not persistant across reboots) - disable firewalld and enable iptables
>> before doing packstack.
>
> Right.
>
> Please file a bug, when you find time. This needs to be tracked.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981583
>> * sudoers restrictions being too tight for the quantum user to update
> dhcp
>> records - edit /etc/sudoers.d/quantum to allow that user to execute all
>> commands via sudo (not very secure I know...)
>
This appeared when I ran packstack from the git repo, I'll follow this up
later.
>
>> * selinux rules preventing random stuff - so I set selinux to permissive
>> mode
>
> If you file bz, maybe along with the o/p of:
>
> $ cat /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -R
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981598
>
>
>> * the systemd unit file for quantum-l3-agent is wrong -
>> sed -i '/^ExecStart/ { s#.*#ExecStart=/usr/bin/quantum-l3-agent
>> --config-file /etc/quantum/quantum.conf --config-file
>> /etc/quantum/l3_agent.ini --log-file /var/log/quantum/l3-agent.log# }'
>> /usr/lib/systemd/system/quantum-l3-agent.service
>
> Also, sounds like bug.
>
This appears to only show up when running packstack from the git repo, I'll
follow this up later.
>
>>
>> I think this is also a problem:
>> * limits are wrong for the memcached configuration
>
This wasn't a problem with the openstack-packstack RPM, it may just be a
bug in the upstream git repo. I follow this up later.
>>
>> I ran into more issues, but I didn't write them down and I've not had
> time
>> to make a systematic check from a clean install.
>
> Again, if you have time, please file these as bugs, as you have the
> context in your head,
> these need to be tracked.
>
Will do.
Additionally, I caught this one (qpidd doesn't start and packstack doesn't
report it failing) from the fedora RPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981601
Some of the above issues are fixed in the upstream packstack git repo, so I
would recommend anyone else to take a look at that (although it has it's
own bugs which I will try to report).
For my future reference and the benefit of anyone else trying to use
packstack on f19 ATM (using the RPM
openstack-packstack-2013.1.1-0.3.dev527.fc19.noarch), I also ran into these
problems:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979041