[rdo-list] RDO CI hardware requirements for CentOS altarch

[Xiandong Meng]

David, thank you for your response.

For Packstack and Puppet-OpenStack jobs, I noticed that usually each job
takes no more than 45 minutes. How many jobs may run in parallel and how
often they are triggered?

Regards,

Alex Meng <mengxiandong at gmail.com>
mengxiandong at gmail.com

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:24 AM, David Moreau Simard <dms at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Alex,
>
> I don't know the specifics of resource usage for alternative
> architectures but I can tell about x86_64.
>
> Packstack and Puppet-OpenStack jobs are designed to run within 8GB of
> RAM - either on a single virtual machine or on a single bare metal
> server.
> I would say 4 cores is the minimum (or otherwise job length is
> severely affected), 8 is best.
> Disk space is not generally a concern, easily fitting within 50GB of space.
>
> I don't have the numbers for TripleO so I'll let someone else chime in on
> that.
>
> David Moreau Simard
> Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO
>
> dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Xiandong Meng <mengxiandong at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > We had discussed it a bit in previous RDO meeting on irc. I want to
> write a
> > separate mail
> > for more broad and in-depth discussion here.
> >
> >
> > For a master release (for now it is Newton), i noticed the promotion
> pipes
> > fall into three different categories:
> > - Triple-O based CI test
> > - Packstack based test
> > - OpenStack-Puppet based test
> >
> > So what is the base minimal CI requirements to start with for AltArch
> > support? Since many of the CI test should work even with VMs instead of
> > physical nodes, can we start
> > with 1-2 physical servers?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Alex Meng
> > mengxiandong at gmail.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rdo-list mailing list
> > rdo-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> >
> > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rdoproject.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20160811/0b37fa08/attachment.html>