[Rdo-list] Packaging the big tent (or at least part of it)
pmyers at redhat.com
Thu May 28 13:27:15 UTC 2015
On 05/28/2015 09:13 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> On 05/28/2015 03:05 PM, Perry Myers wrote:
>> So... Can we use Fedora but somehow just not include the OpenStack
>> core packages in Fedora proper?
> What's the intended goal to stick to Fedora infra while not providing
> packages for it? For me, it does not make sense at all and sounds like
> an abuse of Fedora resources.
> Till now, I've heard that some people see value in walking thru
> official Fedora new package review process. Any other reasons to stick
> to it?
That's one thing, the other would be to show tight alignment with the
My reasons for thinking we should stick with Fedora infra is similar to
what we're doing with CentOS.
We use CBS and a lot of CentOS infra, but RDO is not _in_ CentOS. It's
in a CentOS SIG (Cloud SIG)
I think Fedora needs the same concept as the CentOS SIGs...
> Not that I think the new package review argument is valid since we
> still can apply the process to our reviews outside of Fedora infra.
> But that's at least something.
More information about the dev