[rdo-dev] [Octavia] Providing service VM images in RDO

Bernard Cafarelli bcafarel at redhat.com
Fri Jan 26 09:37:28 UTC 2018


On 25 January 2018 at 16:58, Javier Pena <jpena at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> Bumping the thead, upstream patches are merged now [0]
>>
>> With current upstream code, I can generate an image from master packages
>> with:
>> $ wget
>> https://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1801-01.qcow2
>> $ virt-customize -a CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1801-01.qcow2
>> --selinux-relabel --run-command 'yum-config-manager --add-repo
>> http://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7/delorean-deps.repo'
>> $ virt-customize -a CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1801-01.qcow2
>> --selinux-relabel --run-command 'yum-config-manager --add-repo
>> https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7/current-passed-ci/delorean.repo'
>> $ DIB_LOCAL_IMAGE=/home/stack/CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1801-01.qcow2
>>  /opt/stack/octavia/diskimage-create/diskimage-create.sh -p -i centos
>> -o amphora-x64-haproxy-centos.qcow2
>>
>> This is with devstack, but will be mostly the same when RDO packages
>> are updated (just the script location that then comes from
>> openstack-octavia-diskimage-create package)
>>
>
> I have run a quick test with the latest openstack-octavia-diskimage-create package from RDO Trunk, and it works like a charm.
Nice, thanks for the test!
>
>> So what are the next steps here? missing information, place to track
>> this, item for next meeting, action items, … ?
>>
>
> Let's add it as an item for the next meeting, so we define a plan. My proposal would be a daily build using a periodic job, storing images in a new path under images.rdoproject.org.
Ack, that sounds good and inline with the previous mails suggestion.
Thanks for adding the agenda item, I will be around for next meeting!

>
> Regards,
> Javier
>
>
>>
>> [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522626/
>>
>> On 12 January 2018 at 13:05, Bernard Cafarelli <bcafarel at redhat.com> wrote:
>> > On 11 January 2018 at 11:53, Javier Pena <jpena at redhat.com> wrote:
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:50 PM, Javier Pena <jpena at redhat.com> wrote:
>> >>> > If we want to deliver via RPM and build on each Octavia change, we
>> >>> > could
>> >>> > try to add it to the octavia spec and build it using DLRN. Does the
>> >>> > script
>> >>> > require many external resources besides diskimage-builder?
>> >>> > I'm not sure if that would work on CBS though, if we need to have
>> >>> > network
>> >>> > connectivity during the build process.
>> > I looked a bit initially into building the image directly in spec, one
>> > problem was how to pass the needed RDO packages properly to
>> > diskimage-builder (as a repo so that yum pulls them in).
>> > Apart from some configuration tweaks, most of the steps sum up to yum
>> > calls (system update - install haproxy, keepalived, … - install
>> > openstack-octavia-amphora-agent), these need network access, or at
>> > least local mirrors.
>> >>>
>> >>> I would be concerned with the storage required, also we need to
>> >>> trigger not only on Octavia distgit or upstream changes, all included
>> >>> RPMs need to be checked checked for updates.
>> >>> This could be simulated with dummy commits in distgit to force e.g.
>> >>> nightly refresh but due to storage requirements, I'd keep image builds
>> >>> outside trunk repos.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> I have been doing some tests, and it looks like running diskimage-builder
>> >> from a chroot is not the best idea (it tries to mount some tmpfs and
>> >> fails), so even if we solved the storage issue it wouldn't work.
>> >> I think our best chance is to create a periodic job to rebuild the images
>> >> (daily) then upload them to images.rdoproject.org. This would be a
>> >> similar approach to what we are currently doing with containers.
>> > That would work for "keeping other packages up to date" too
>> >
>> >> The only drawback of this alternative is that we would be distributing the
>> >> qcow2 images instead of an RPM package, but we could still apply
>> >> retention policies, and add some CI jobs to test them if needed.
>> > On disk usage and retention polices, the images I build locally (with
>> > CentOS) are 500-500 MB qcow2 files
>> >
>> > --
>> > Bernard
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bernard Cafarelli
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev mailing list
>> dev at lists.rdoproject.org
>> http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>
>> To unsubscribe: dev-unsubscribe at lists.rdoproject.org
>>


Regards,
-- 
Bernard


More information about the dev mailing list